Drilling In Alaska Dbq
Drilling in Alaska “In reality drilling is the slowest, dirtiest, and most expensive way to solve our energy crisis”-Lois Capps. This quote explains how there different ways to solve our problems and drilling is not the right way to solve this. In addition to costing a lot of money, it would also destroy animal habitats. While drilling, the oil can also pollute the ocean. Everyone is asking ‘Should The United States should Drill for Oil in Alaskan Wilderness?’ The best way to sort this out is by looking at the Economic factors, Environmental Factors, and Other Factors. Drilling in Alaskan wilderness would cause economic problems. Drilling in Alaska would not solve gasoline and oil problems. This is because in Document C it shows a study that it would only reduce US oil imports by 4%, which means it won't make that …show more content…
In Document B it says that jobs would be created, but at the same time it would be too expensive. Document B also says “If oil is discovered, less than 2,000 acres of the 1.5 million acres of the Coastal Plain would be affected” this says that it would destroy people's homes. There is no reason to try to solve a problem, when you’re going to create another. Anything can go wrong if you drill for oil. In the Pro-Drilling video, it showed that a reef spilled more than 11 million gallons of oil in Alaska. This proves that anything can go wrong, so the best thing to do is not to do it at all. The Pro-Drilling video also showed that their is a decline in Alaska, by drilling it would decrease even more. In Document A, it shows a map and some animals like seals, polar bears, arctic owls, and wolves, by drilling they all will be harmed. Although drilling in Alaska had its pro’s, it's con’s are more important. Some documents showed that it can be good but at the same time there would be a problem. Drilling would cause economic factors, environmental problems, and other problems. The best thing is to be safe than
Should The United States Drill For Alaska Dbq Essay
722 Words | 3 PagesFurther, drilling for oil is not worth the massive tradeoffs. Therefore, the United States should not drill for oil in Alaska because it is not worth it, it does not solve our oil problems and it destroys the environment. To begin, The United States should not drill for oil in Alaska because it will destroy the environment. I
The Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
2299 Words | 10 PagesWith rising gas prices and an increasing reliance on nonrenewable resources, finding a reliable source for extracting and transporting oil has become an issue. In 2010, the Keystone Pipeline project was proposed and commissioned by TransCanada. Essentially, this is a pipeline that transports oil sands bitumen across the Canada-US border and into several different reserves in the States. An additional extension to the Keystone Pipeline, the Keystone XL Pipeline, has also been proposed. Several issues arise when considering the consequences of this new proposal, including the potential for oil spills and habitat damage.
The Credibility Of Edwin Drake's Whaling Industry
180 Words | 1 PagesThe petroleum market rose in 1859 after former rail director Edwin Drake successfully unearthed an oil well with his own oil drill. After this breakthrough, investors realized that oil sites made more financial sense than whaling voyages. Whaling was dangerous, time-consuming, and expensive—while often yielding no profit. But oil drilling was generally risk-free, would not cost anyone’s life, and was more likely to yield something profitable with the reliability of Drake’s oil drill. Consequently, many whaling ports lost their funding to oil sites, and kerosene replaced whale oil as America’s leading natural resource.
On The Keystone Pipeline Analysis
340 Words | 2 PagesThe author of the article Greg Ip, believes that despite Obama’s statement, the President knows very well that even though the pipeline will not go into fruition, fossils fuels will still
Summary Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
537 Words | 3 PagesHe talks about the possible benefits of the drilling while showing how they do not compare to the downsides by saying “At best, the Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles. Instead of tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge, we should use our resources more wisely.” Carter explains that even though a small percentage of our daily use will be covered by drilling into the Arctic Refuge, there are much better ways to go about it that don’t involve destroying nature. More fuel-efficient vehicles are given as an example that could be seen as an alternative solution that doesn’t damage the wildlife.
Keystone Pipeline Project Research Paper
2089 Words | 9 PagesThe environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
Annotated Bibliography On Keystone Pipeline
903 Words | 4 PagesThe evidence that this proposal would not be beneficial was shown in Biello’s article. Climatologists advise burning of fossil fuels will adversely affect climate change. The amount of greenhouse gases in the air will increase. With no control of temperature, the water level in oceans will rise higher and higher each day. With this in mind, people have been strictly against the pipeline.
Dakota Pipeline Research Paper
347 Words | 2 PagesAlong with creating new jobs, the Dakota Pipeline transports crude oil. We should continue construction of the Dakota Pipeline is to increase production of crude oil. Our country uses more crude oil than any other country. We need to bring our production of crude oil higher than our consuming rate. If we continue to use more crude oil than make it, our country will depend more and more on foreign oil when we should be relying on ourselves.
Alaskan Mine Research Paper
1599 Words | 7 PagesJobs, employment opportunities, wealth, and prosperity are promises made by Northern Dynasty, the Canadian company developing a site in the Bristol Bay region of Alaska. Recently a source of wealth for the people of Bristol Bay has been found buried beneath the Tundra. The rocks contain enormous amounts of ore and minerals, never discovered in such bulk in North America or possibly the world before. These include copper, molybdenum, gold, silver, rhenium, and, palladium worth $300 billion to $500billion dollars. (AAAS New and Notes.
The Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
868 Words | 4 PagesThis amount of oil coming into the United States from Canada would have made a positive impact for the United States. It is not in the best interest of the United States to purchase our oil from across seas, because transporting oil via freight ships, railways and trucks can be detrimental to oceans and the earth, like the accident that occurred in 2015 when 14 tanker cars derailed in West Virginia (News Tribune, February 16,
Oil Fracking In Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesBy fracking for natural gas and shifting from coal to natural gas power generation plants, we could benefit economically, save our environment, and save millions of gallons of
Jimmy Carter's Argument Analysis
466 Words | 2 PagesSince he left office, there have been many proposals to open the Arctic Refuge coastal plain to oil drilling. They’ve all been denied because of the opposition by the American people, including the Gwich’in Athabascan Indians of Alaska and Canada, indigenous people whose culture has depended on the Porcupine caribou herd for thousands of years. The short-term economic gain is not worth destroying their homes. He said the Arctic Refuge may provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, we should just use our resources more wisely instead.
Keystone XL Pipeline Research Paper
628 Words | 3 PagesControversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
The Pros And Cons Of Trans Alaska Pipeline
1214 Words | 5 PagesSince its construction in 1977, the Trans Alaska Pipeline has transported almost 17 billion barrels of oil, and currently transports about 527,323 barrels a day. It celebrated its 40th Anniversary last year, and, even after all this time, is still facing controversy. The pipeline is highly debated as economically inclined citizens of Alaska are clashing with more environmental types. The Trans Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, signed by President Nixon in 1973, protected the pipeline by banning all legal challenges against the construction of the pipeline. However, this law did not stop the critics of the pipeline from speaking out.
Fracking Persuasive Speech
943 Words | 4 PagesOur natural resources are at risk every time fracking occurs. Fracking needs to be banned since it is hurting our health and that it drains our natural and limited resources required for us to sustain life. Water is an essential to living and it is a need. Without it we would be dead from the dehydration. Fracking in this case can contaminate it to where we cannot drink it and if we do it can lead to death or a trip to the hospital:
More about Drilling In Alaska Dbq
Should The United States Drill For Alaska Dbq Essay
722 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
2299 Words | 10 PagesThe Credibility Of Edwin Drake's Whaling Industry
180 Words | 1 PagesOn The Keystone Pipeline Analysis
340 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
537 Words | 3 PagesKeystone Pipeline Project Research Paper
2089 Words | 9 PagesAnnotated Bibliography On Keystone Pipeline
903 Words | 4 PagesDakota Pipeline Research Paper
347 Words | 2 PagesAlaskan Mine Research Paper
1599 Words | 7 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
868 Words | 4 PagesOil Fracking In Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesJimmy Carter's Argument Analysis
466 Words | 2 PagesKeystone XL Pipeline Research Paper
628 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Trans Alaska Pipeline
1214 Words | 5 PagesFracking Persuasive Speech
943 Words | 4 Pages