Why the drinking age should be lowered in the US The drinking age in the U.S should be lowered because there are many problems that have happened and are still happening in the United States. For example some of these problems are teen pregnancy, car accidents and underage drinking. These Scenarios are happening everywhere around the United States. They are all very dangerous because most teenagers start to drink at the ages of 16 and 17. People have debated about this before saying that teenagers are not mature enough to handle the alcohol consumption that most teenagers are drinking as of right now.
NBC News San Diego reported that the study found drivers who had a BAC level of 0.01 percent were 46 percent more likely to cause accidents than the sober drivers they collided with. Therefore, people’s risk of causing serious crashes increases as their BAC levels rise. Seeking legal guidance Californians who are involved in drunk driving accidents may suffer serious injuries, which require extensive medical treatment. This may lead to unexpected medical expenses and, in some cases, may impact their ability to work and provide for their families. Therefore, people who have experienced these types of situations may benefit from working with an attorney.
There are many benefits to having a lowered drinking age, which I will explain in this letter. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), about 1 in 10 teens in high school drink and drive. This is a lot. The CDC also states that young drivers are 17 times more likely to die in a crash when they have a blood alcohol level of .08 or above compared to when they haven’t been drinking; however, there is still some good news. Teen drinking
This is simply because Alcohol can put people in danger. Drunk driving seems to be a black spot of our civilization. An average of 17,000 individuals die each year in drunk driving related accidents, and drunk driving continues to be an enormously important public safety issue (MADD). With lowering this drinking age we can only expect more cases of drunk driving and more lives are put in danger. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration estimates that about 900 lives are saved annually due to fewer alcohol-related traffic crashes involving underage drivers.
According to William Dejong of Boston University, there is a trickle-down effect that will cause even younger kids to drink if the drinking age is lowered to 18. It is a common thing to have 15-17-year-olds being friends with 18-20-year-olds. If those 18-20-year-olds can legally purchase alcohol, they will be drinking with and around their younger friends that are still under the legal age. Right now, this is happening with 21+-year-olds giving alcohol to 18-20-year-olds. If the drinking age is lowered, it will just increase the amount of illegal and unsupervised drinking going on in the nation.
Numerous debates still occur today about the minimum drinking age. A poll taken on July 2014 asked the public opinion of US adults for lowering the US legal drinking age from 21 to 18. Approximately 74% of the people opposed the idea, whereas roughly 25% of the people supported the idea ("Public Opinion" 1). The statistics indicate satisfaction among the majority of the people; however, with the current laws many issues arise that must be addressed concerning alcohol use. For starters, studies show an increase of dangerous drinking habits among young adults (Hall 2).
According to the CDC, underage drinking is responsible for more than 4,300 deaths per year, but why? Most teenagers are uneducated and unsupervised when it comes to consuming alcohol and its effects. If one doesn’t teach about the effects of alcohol, then it could become disastrous for not only the user but others too. Most teenagers may only know a fraction of the effects based on experience or from seeing it in movies or television. I believe that if the drinking age was lowered, teenagers could be better educated to drink more
The minimum legal drinking age should not be lowered from the age of 21 to the age of 18. Your brain is not fully developed until about the age of 21. Another thing on why it should stay the same is people are a little more mature in their early twenties then when they were in their teens. Lowering MLDA 21 to 18 will responsibly allow a greater segment of the population to drink alcohol in bars and night clubs which are not safe environments. Almost eighty percent of bars sell alcohol to obviously intoxicated patrons; more than half of the drivers arrested for drinking while driving are while intoxicated and get a DWI.
Prior to reading, “Teen Drivers”, I thought teen driving was not as big as an issue as the general public made it. Now I am concerned by my age group’s actions and believe the strict driving laws for youth are justified by the facts and the attempts to prevent the rising accidents among teens. In the article, the author quotes the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which states, “Crashes are the leading cause of death among American teens, accounting for more than one third of all deaths of sixteen- to eighteen-year-olds.” This not only proves the danger of inexperienced drivers to themselves, but also the danger they cause to other drivers on the road and the possible passengers in the car as well. Brian O’Neill of the Insurance Institute
Over the last twenty-two years, there have been more than 130,000 fatal teen crashes. Though these teenagers are legal, trained drivers, what is a solution to reduce the number of lives lost due to these lethal car crashes? Scientists believe that the solution to reducing the amount of deaths would be to raise the driving age and enforce stricter driving laws. Parents, however, are against raising the driving age as they would have to drive their teenager to the movies for a longer period of time. Thus, the driving age should be raised to twenty due to the maturity of people’s brains and understanding of consequences rather than depending on emotions and desires.