Americans today should not have the right to engage in such an act that can harm or put others in danger. People who text or speak on the phone while driving to “will actually miss a lot of things that are in their visual periphery,” David Meyer, a psychology professor at the University of Michigan, told National Public Radio (“Texting While Driving”). In addition, cars today have obtained touch screens and internet access while driving. In this case it also uses the luxury of voice commands.
In addition, recent studies have shown that human drivers are more likely to be involved in an accident in comparison to driverless cars. Cars of Tomorrow-Still Not Flying states; “Google has had a fleet of driverless cars since 2009, and they’ve driven over a half a million miles without a crash. Human drivers get in an accident about every half a million miles on average in the United States, so either the Google cars are due, or they’re going to out-drive humans yet again.” This explains that in recent humans are more accident prone and get into accidents more frequently. Not to mention the fact that amongst humans driverless cars could ultimately end up saving lives.
Often is the case where these problems turn out to be fatal. So the clear answer to solving these issues is to remove the human element, without humans roads would be a safer place. At least that is the concept behind driver-less or self-driving cars. Google is one of the companies leading the charge against this problem.
Using a cell phone while driving has become increasingly common on our roads today. “Driving while yakking may seem harmless to you,” argues Easterbrook, “but try telling that to the loved ones of the hundreds or even thousands who die each year in totally avoidable phone-related accidents” (A-3). He proposes that there are more methods of catching people carrying out distracted driving. He poses the question, “If automated cameras can issue speeding tickets, why can’t they issue tickets to the owners of cars photographed with a driver using a phone” (A3)? Other potential dangers can even come from the cars themselves
Relating to articles, “ The Science Behind Distracted Driving.” Perfect information for evidence. The new power point i’d like to knock out would be, facts have proven multiple times that the phrase, “ Out of sight, out of mind” helps to prevent the dangers of texting while in a car that is active. Even passengers should be aware not to use their phones.
Driverless Cars You may have heard of driverless cars since they have been talked about by many people. Though self-driving cars have just begun to get so popular, they have been under development for years. However, no matter how popular they are, driverless cars just might be the most ridiculous thing I ever heard of. To start with, driverless cars focus primarily on pre-programmed information on roads, highways, and other routes.
No matter how much caution we exercise and attention we put into our car, it is just impossible to keep them spotless and flaw-free forever. Not only does your it wear out with age, but there is also a possibility of getting into an accident, which can result in dents to the hood and other parts of the vehicle. Dents occur more often than we’d like, and whether it’s a low- or high-impact dent, professional hood dent repair can get rid of these imperfections. Car owners in Rochester, NY turn to the expertise and experience of Brighton Collision whenever they need to get rid of pesky and unsightly dents in their vehicles.
Now the cars have more technologies than the ole models. The modern vehicles embedeed with marvellous engineering, but the people might be worried about driving the cars by understanding all of its modern features. The too much techology in new cars can result to be a bad scenario. According to the recent analysis, many people share their opinion that the maodern cars are becoming too much complicated and making it more annoying in different ways.
One ethical issue of driverless cars the choice of action when facing an inevitable accident with another party. In this situation, the car has to decide which party to harm. This means the people developing the car software may face the issue of deciding different values or worth on human lives or leaving it to the machine learning software to decide itself. Another issue is whether driverless cars should fully prevent human interaction or still allow humans to control the car if and when they see fit. This may raise the question of whether human error or software error was the cause of any accidents.
That chance is three to four accidents per lifetime; with being behind the wheel. With knowing that it is good to be informed that driverless cars do not have a certain age group documented for the use of it. Rates of drunk driving, at fault, and fatal crashes have decreased; since autonomous vehicles have been implemented into mainstream society. “A number of today’s new motor vehicles have technology that helps drivers avoid drifting into adjacent lanes or making unsafe lane changes, or that warns drivers of other vehicles behind them when they are backing up, or that brakes automatically if a vehicle ahead of them stops or slows
there 's one topic that gets a lot of attention lately in the media,its driverless cars. According to the Centers for Disease Control, fatalities from traffic incidents happen on an annual basis upwards of 33,000 people. Many of these accidents are preventable, and an alarming number of them are a result of distracted driving. In the past few years, as a result of the number of traffic accidents plaguing the country and the devastating injuries and fatalities that result from them, a greater push has been made in the sphere of technology to make cars safer, drivers more aware, and accidents less likely.
By now it is no secret, within the next few years, traditional cars will start to be challenged by their robotic brethren; Autonomous Autos. Some of those on the production side of the equation; Elon Musk; says that the introduction of all out self driving cars will make not only traditional cars but traditional drivers obsolete. To be fair, the autopilot feature on the Tesla Models S and X, already drives better than the average octogenarian (and probably most teenagers too). Musk claims that Autonomous Autos drive far superior to people; that is why he claims that physically driving a car will likely be made illegal in the future.
Juston Marler American Lit. Should driverless cars be allowed? Screech!! Crash!! Your driverless car was driving on a gravel road and lost control.