The choice is up to you, please choose wisely. I believe that cell phones should be banned while driving because the majority of car crashes are caused by reckless drivers who are distracted by their phones and pay no attention the the road that is ahead of them. Everyday, at least one person will have an accident because they are not paying attention to the road that is ahead of them. It is not safe for a driver to have any distractions
When driving a vehicle, one is supposed to be diligent and not be distracted to assess the condition of the road. With the widespread use of cellular devices, aka phones and texting, there has been an increase in unnecessary accidents and deaths associated with drivers being distracted by texting while driving. Since common sense is apparently not enough for people to abstain texting while driving, I believe the act should be illegal for the good of the country. One major reason is that when one is distracted by texting while driving, there can be the chance to cause the accident and have loss of life, including the drivers. Another reason, if less important, is if life is not lost in a vehicular accident, there will be some type of damage, whether vehicular or property damage, and that will
Since the early 2000 's, cell phone related car crashes have increased in number. Talking, texting, or merely glancing at a cell phone while being behind the wheel is a dangerous distraction while going 70, 50, or even 20 miles per hour. This is why I think that driving while using a handheld cellphone should be illegal. Talking on a cellphone is just as dangerous as texing, though some motorists would disagree, saying that talking on a cellphone is not as dangerous as texting, but they are very wrong. When a driver is concentrating on a conversation, they pay less attention to what is going on around them in favor of the voice in their ear.
For example, many of the friendliest citizens break the speeding law when they witness someone else get away with speeding. This shows that if one citizen speeds, another one will want to also speed since the first citizen did not get caught. Another reason that supports Trippett’s argument is that many normal people are harassed into breaking the law and do not even realize it. For example, if you are going the speed limit and someone honks their horn at another citizen, their natural instinct is to go faster, which would break the law. This shows that a citizen will follow the law, but those around him will not and influence him to break it.
In recent discussions of whether or not to enforce tougher laws in order to stop texting and driving, a controversial issue has been whether or not to enforce the laws. On one hand, some argue that texting and driving really isn 't that dangerous. From this perspective, they think that this isn 't very dangerous because it is only for a quick moment. On the other hand, however, others argue that it is very dangerous and can bring great harm to people that are driving. For example, a statement that supports this would be that many people have died or have gotten seriously injured.
FINES + COINS INSERTED - COST OF ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM Another example of traffic offense is speeding .By enforcing a legal maximum on the speed one can reduce the deaths and injuries caused by speeding of the vehicles. This would cause inconvenience to many as 1. Additional time spent in travelling 2.Additonal fuel consumption 3.
It is believed by them that this would only ruin their productivity and negatively affect their lives. However, most places allow teenagers to drive past curfew if their commute is school, emergency, religious, or work related. Other than these, there is no reason for teenagers to be out on the roads late at night. A curfew allows for young people to be much safer from the dangers produced by the night.
The last reason why teens should have curfews is, if a teen is outside and it starts getting dark, the parents start to get worried. The parents worry that there could be someone following them or be killed. In order for parents to keep their children safe, you should give them a curfew, so that they could be safe if anything were to happen in the dark. To save more children, you need to give them curfews to save innocent lives. “One of many things like gangs and parolees, we need to do something, people are
Most thieves won 't be carrying a helmet with them so they’ll draw police’s attention on the road and possibly lead to an arrest. Most importantly is that it will save your live and it does that with physics. The use of a helmet and hitting concrete in an accident is a lot safer than without one and getting direct contact. A good helmet can act to absorb and distribute the force of the impact, and thus, lessen the impact on the rider’s head. Without a helmet, the skull itself cracks and, with the forces involved, the tiny bit of fluid surrounding the brain is not adequate to cushion the brain.
Would you agree that being on the phone while driving is not safe for you or anyone around you? I agree with the law that in some states it is illegal to drive while using handheld cell phones because the driver could get distracted easily, it is very dangerous, and it could cause car accidents. Phones can be very distracting. If the driver is worried about something happening on their phone they are less likely to pay attention to the road. Also, if the driver is in an argument with someone over the phone and it is really bothering them, they would have their mind on that and not the road.
Some states have now made it illegal to drive while using hand-held cell phones. By doing so it allows the driver to become more engaged into his or her driving. I see driving as a way to free yourself and not a way to be tied down to electronics or social media. It is proven that people who drive while using a hand-held device have a higher chance of getting into an accident. Making the use of hand-held devices illegal provides a safer experience for all types of drivers, it allows drivers to be more engaged, and it allows the driver to be alert to on going changes.
While distracted driving is a big issue in the United States, I firmly believe that the use of smartphones is one of, if not, the largest distractions Americans face today while driving. It seems that for some reason people can not wait until they are done driving, to wherever it is they are headed, to check their phone. Yes, I understand that in some situations people will have an emergency where they have to look at their phone, but in a vast majority of instances this is not the case. There are a few things that could be implemented that could persuade people to resist the urge to check their phones while driving such as banning the use of cellular devices in vehicles all together, fixing vehicles so that they cannot emit WiFi anymore, also implementing a device in vehicles that could make the inside of a vehicle a dead zone. First of all banning the use of cell phones in vehicles could be a very tricky stunt to pull off.
The problem at hand is that texting while driving could increase the occurrence probability of accidents for motor vehicle. The drivers should know all the laws about driving in any state they go to. Even the state could benefit of texting while driving law when someone break the law the person has to pay a fine.
Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous. This is why some states have made it illegal to drive while using a handheld cell phone. This makes the roads much safer as it takes a potential distraction away from the driver, this leads to less car crashes, and safer roads By taking this potential distraction away from a driver you allow that person to focus more on what they are supposed to be doing which is driving. In doing so the driver is better able to react in potentially hazardous situations. Also in a car having a real person to talk to can be distracting but while you are on a cell phone you have to hold onto the phone, and the steering wheel.