On April 20 of this year I attended the drug court which is located in the Erie County Courthouse. The Drug Court is intended to promote healthy and law-abiding behavior for its participants. It acts as an alternative for jail and an individual is free to live in the community as long he or she participates in all services, along with being subject to random drug testing. The court room consists of a judge, lawyers, probation officers, and counselors who access each participants progress through the program. This specific Treatment Court has an informal feel to it, because from time to time all of the participants are asked to give a round of applause to each who stands in front of the judge. Because of its informal approach each participant …show more content…
The judge displayed compassion and empathy for each person and seemed very concerned about each person. He listened to probation officers and counselors on what they have to say about the person in question. Based on that information he made his decision to promote individual to the next level or to keep at the same. In addition, the counselors and probation officers were honest in assessing people and gave suggestions about their success and improvements. They also presented some ways how to do better or congratulated individuals on their success. I think that this opportunity for substance abusers to prove that they can be successful members of the society by going through all the necessary steps required by the Drug Court is very encouraging. It seemed that this program made them open their eyes and realize their position in life. They understand something must be changed and this Treatment Court is a good opportunity to do so. The judge is ultimate decision maker who looks at the individual and sees the progress. It is his discretion that decides one's future, because he has the power to keep that person in the program or incarcerate. He ways all the different aspects of each case, listens to counselors, and single handily deliberates
September 29, 2017 Officer Beckman, Supervisor Manley County Probation Department 555 Chestnut Lane Bouldercreek, GA 28394 Dear Officer Beckman: When it comes to life outcomes for any given person, there are unlimited people, circumstances, and personal choices that can affect a person and the life that they may lead for themselves. When trying to understand the details that produce any final result, the truth of the matter can be messy, complicated, and sometimes unclear. In most cases, there is not any one thing that caused a downward spiral or an upward shot, but rather a sequence of events, a plethora of circumstances, and a wide variety of people.
The justice system has to take a new approach to enforce law that place minor drug offenses in jail for long periods of time and actually
My rhetorical situation for this argument is to bring to light the corruption of the Michigan Judicial system, focused more on Sobriety Court. My audience is directed towards students and instructors at NMC. My stance is that the Sobriety Court system needs to be more supportive to their partakers. My context is derived from a personal experience with my topic.
In chapter 15 of Corrections in America, the author outlined the history of parole and compares and contrast parole and pardon. The author also describes the current status of parole in the United States and the prisoner reentry process. In addition, this chapter explains how parole is granted and the role of the parole board, how parole supervision is terminated, re entry courts, and the effectiveness of parole. Parole is a correctional option that often evokes feelings.
More people get incarcerated for non-violent crimes and crimes caused by mental illnesses or drug abuse (Webb, 2009) and because these people get put in regular prisons, instead of in mental health facilities or facilities to help against drug addiction, where they could be treated to further prevent crimes driven by their illness (Webb, 2009), the prisons get overfilled and cannot hold the more ‘important’ prisoners that needed to be locked away from the public. A strong link of the criminal justice process is that the system tries to keep it fair for everyone. Every defendant has the right to an attorney so they can be defended properly and fairly and “Only judges who are adequately informed about a case can effectively control the proceedings and examine evidence” (Tochilovsky, 2002) It is also important for the criminal justice system that those involved show discretion and although this is not always the case, discretion by the judges, police, etc.
While experiencing a drug court they may get fines and drug programs they have to finish. They will choose the kind of court when sentenced, this relies on upon how much drugs they possess. The purpose for the drug courts and drug programs is restoration for drug users was costly; they implemented these programs to offer assistance.
The courts addressing new reforms and civil rights turned their attentions to corrections (and other areas of criminal law). The effect upon corrections was profound suddenly they had to account for procedures and attitudes and were ill-prepared to do so in many areas of the country. The beginning of this era, and the end of hands-off, could be isolated on some cases that reached the courts.
The first drug court was established in Miami-Dade, Florida in 1989. Drug courts were established because of the “revolving door of drug use” and increasing recidivism rates. Drug courts have the ability to change a person’s life for the better by teaching them how to beat their addictions while providing the proper treatments for each offender. As a result, of the ongoing development of drug courts it is unfair to expect the system to be indefectible. Still, there are many benefits in participating in the drug court system.
(http://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Drug-Courts-A-Review-of-the-Evidence.pdf) Since 1989 the number of Drug Courts have risen significantly due to the realization of the need for treatment with offenders that have a history of drug abuse. There is a total of 3,133 drug courts in the United States today with 1,561 of them being solely adult drug courts. (http://www.ndcrc.org/content/how-many-drug-courts-are-there). The drug court movement reflects the desire to shift the emphasis from attempting to combat drug crimes by reducing the supply of drugs into addressing the demand for drugs through the treatment of addiction.
The idea behind these program was to help treat the offenders for their substance abuse disorders while still holding them accountable for the crime that they had committed (Lutze & Wormer, 2013). Many studies have been conducted in order to assess the effectiveness of drug court programs across the country. In a qualitative study done by Gallagher 100 participants of the drug court program were examined. This study found that of the drug court participants, seventy-nine percent were not rearrested in the follow-up period. Twenty-one percent of those participants were rearrested (Gallagher, 2014).
The pretrial services program instituted in 1960 was developed with the aim of improving the judicial system. It was set that for a bail to be granted to an arrestee a few things had to be verified to ensure a sound the program worked effectively. Firstly, information about the arrestee was to be verified and scrutinized with the focus on his or her past criminal history, history of drug and alcohol abuse, employment and residency. The chances that an arrestee would fail to appear in court on his day in court had to be assessed. Lastly, supervision was paramount, with the progress of the arrestee being assessed and their compliance with the conditions set before their release.
The Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program is another attempt to provide better treatment for people who are convicted. The study showed that drug offenders who underwent a treatment program outside of prison had a 26 percent less rate of re-arrest after two years than a control group that was sent to prison (Justice Policy Institute, 2010). Rehabilitative programs like the Second Chance Act and the Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program has shown to growth and positive
Also, some critics of specialized courts are in favor of traditional adjudication and prefer to go “back to basics” even though evidence shows that specialized courts are effective in their goals in the criminal justice system. Upon an evaluation of the benefits that specialized courts has on a community by way of promoting positive change in individuals to better themselves and the community as a whole, it is recommended that the court administrator move forward with efforts to create specialized courts and support ongoing funding to sustain these types of problem solving
Furthermore, the parole system is known to have a multitude of problems laced within it, these problems can be solved by focusing on parolee and parole officer relationships, and partaking in systems that improve the underlying issues. Following through to fix these affairs may seem unrealistic, but a solution could be in sight. Issues within the parole system in the United States include the ineffectivity of parolees meeting with their supervising
Specific Purpose Statement: To invite my audience to see the different viewpoints involved with life after prison in the U.S. Thesis: Those who were once in incarceration live with the title of being a former convict the rest of their life. I wish to explore their lives after incarceration and I hope to find the differing opinions some of you may have on those that have re-joined our community. Pattern of Organization: Multiple Perspective Pattern Introduction [Attention-Getter] How would you feel knowing you were standing behind a convict in line at a grocery store?