Persuasive speech
Should schools be able to randomly drug test students ?
Students should not be required to take a drug test because it is really none of their business about what a student does outside of school. Drug testing students may not make a difference in the drug usage of students outside of school. “There was no effect on any group of students ' reported intentions to use substances in the future. Of the students subject to drug testing, 34 percent reported that they "definitely will" or "probably will" use substances in the next 12 months, compared with 33 percent of comparable students in schools without the program.There was no evidence that the drug testing reduced students ' participation in extracurricular
…show more content…
“The positive tests are confirmed by a highly accurate scientific process and then reviewed by a physician who consults with the student to insure that the test is accurate and that there is no valid reason the student is testing positive from legitimate prescription drug use.” If a student has a positive test it is reviewed by a physician and has a conversation with the student that has failed the test and makes sure the student is not on a prescription. If the student is on a prescription then he/she is free to go. How do schools fund drug testing ? “Drug testing is a bargain, costing about $10-20 per test. If 50% of eligible students are tested on a random basis during the school year, for 1,000 eligible students the cost of the tests is about $5,000 to $10,000 if the school handles collection and about $12,500 if a Third Party Administrator (TPA) is used. A TPA is an outside agency employed by the school to manage the testing processes.Funding may be obtained from grants, private organizations, local businesses, nonprofit foundations, or donations. For a community it is much less expensive to use effective education and prevention techniques.” Most schools get grants and donations to fund the drug testing but the schools that do not accept grants or donations have to calculate it out of their yearly budget which can be rather expensive. As I quoted earlier
The information is completely factual on both opinions. In reality, drug testing would cost even more than us as taxpayers put in for TANF programs, and things of the like. It would only add to the amount we pay. The government wants to keep everyone happy, but they don’t want to raise taxes, and the people don’t want that either. It is still back and forth and not set in stone as to if they should implement drug testing.
He claims the testing will be used to better prepare individuals for the workplace and rehabilitate those, testing positive for drugs, with state funded treatment plans (Scott Walkers Light …).
Some would argue against drug test, saying it is unfair. This is fair in order to keep our streets safe and our economy
In order to qualify for assistance, people must be: working for low wages or working part-time, unemployed, receiving welfare or other public assistance payments, elderly, homeless, or disabled with low-income (para 3). “The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) sets the rules for SNAP, but individual states run the program. The USDA also provides all the funding for the actual food benefits, while states are responsible for about half the cost of running the program,” (Cancio para 3). Since the state and the federal governments are paying for this program, people should be screened for drugs to prove they are not breaking the federal law about drug use. Illegal drug use is becoming a big issue in today’s society, therefore, most employers have started drug testing before
How do parent not make enough money to feed their children when the government is giving them two meals a day for a week, for an average of one hundred and seventy- eight days? A third argument for not testing recipients is that the day-to-day needs such as food, Healthcare, and clothes will not be met for them. The purpose of a drug test is to see if a recipient is using drugs. If they test positive on that drug test, then one simply must ask where do they get the money to purchase these narcotize?
Working individuals are required to perform these drug tests in order to maintain employee standards for their given company (Besonen). Professional sports teams, the military, and many other institutions enforce drug testing to their employees (Besonen). In theory welfare recipients are basically employees of the state government in terms that they receive their funds, so the standards have reasonable regards to back them up
According to Time.com during the four months, Florida drug tested welfare recipients only 2.6% of applicants tested positive. Drug testing results do not justify the cost of the test and is using money that could be used for something much more important. States are having to pay for an expensive drug test while getting less positive tests and more negative tests. The states that are
It may seem a little invasive, but schools are permitted to use drug dogs to sniff out contraband during unannounced, random searches and it becomes a controversial problem for all. The use of drug-sniffing dogs in schools is permitted because students do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the school and school search did not go against the Fourth Amendment, which is the right of people to be secure in their personal spaces houses and papers. While drug dogs are becoming more and more commonplace in our public schools and to maintaining a drug-dog program can cost district estimates $12,000 and $36,000 every year. Drug dog must go through a long period of time of training and drug dogs are not dangerous to people, but instead it protects people. Without reservation, we must know the history background, advantages, and disadvantages of having a drug dog searches.
I think that drug testing is a very important thing, and now society, some people will use the curiosity of young people on the novelty of goods in the drug trade on campus, many people who do not know often eat. To prevent this from happening, every school should carry out drug-related propaganda to enhance students ' awareness of drugs. But the search for students and property, I feel too compulsive, "since the school officials responsible for the well-being of students in their building, they have the right to search for drugs or weapons at any time," this argument is like the students A serious breach of
If you don't know what the 4th Amendment is, it guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. If students are tested for drugs they may get discouraged about life and want to commit suicide, or they might not try as hard in their school work. Student athletes should not be tested for drugs because it takes money out of their education. Student athletes should not be tested for drugs because it takes money out of their education. They should not test them because it costs so much for a test and to test a couple hundred student athletes.
During a sport all the athletes are required to do drug testing, whether or not they have drugs in their system. These athletes take a urine test which is then sent to a lab. Although that is very effective, some drugs do not show up in the urine like alcohol, oxycodone, methadone to name a few. If sport teams do both urine and blood testing, they could rule out more
All athletes should be required to take a drug test. Drugs are prohibited for use to athletes. Playing sports is a privilege. Using drugs is a violation of the athletic program. Students should be tested for all drugs in there system.
Money is also added for states to hire people to administer the tests (Health and Human Services 7). So that means states already have to pay for the tests themselves and then add more taxpayer money on top of that to hire people to give the tests. Florida and Alabama have proposed that the recipient should have to pay for the test instead (US Health and Human Services). But how is it fair that they should have to pay for the test if there is no reason for them to be tested. In the end the cost of drug testing and testing all approved applicants was between 1.2 and 1.3 million dollars (US Health and Human Services).
“Over 60% of teens claim drugs are used on school grounds”(Fitzgerald). Over the years, schools have not been doing anything to prevent this. Teens revealed that, “1 in 5 of their classmates either drink, use drugs, or smoke during school hours on school grounds” (Fitzgerald). More studies show that, “17% of high school students use drugs daily.” Kids in schools know someone who either does drugs, or sells drugs on school grounds (“School”).
Lien Nguyen November, 13 Professional Communication Professor Barrett Outline Persuasive speech Yearly Driving Tests Specific purpose: To convince my audience that yearly driving tests should be mandatory for the first five years after getting a license. Central idea: Yearly driving test must be mandatory for the first year because it will help to reduce the number of road accident.