Dryden, through his political satire, Absalom and Achitophel try to underscore his intention and discernment of satire in the Restoration Period. Satire was the ideal medium to make the hoi polloi cognizant of their vices and follies and through the use of satire, Dryden highlights the impeding political condition of England and the conflict in the Royal family for kingship using classical and Biblical allusions. The classical references serve as an archetypal medium to intensify the ongoing political unrest in the country and thus, believing that satire could be used to castigate the au courant plight of the seventeenth century British society. Absalom and Achitophel is a political allegory that brings into attention the conflict between Charles II, the Duke of Monmouth, …show more content…
Dryden subtly hints his loyalty towards the King and his government while simultaneously berating the Whigs for supporting the Protestant Duke of Monmouth and the Earl of Shaftesbury. The classical episodes help accentuate the inanity of the Restoration period lending the text satirical distinction. “Godlike” David’s promiscuity is talked about in the beginning of the text, viz. “When Nature prompted, and no law deny’d/Promiscuous use of Concubine and Bride”. Here, Dryden subtly hints at Charles II’s debauchery and satirizes it by drawing citations from the Second Book of Samuel in the Old Testament of the Holy Bible. On the other hand, his son his eulogized by Dryden as he says, “So Beautifull, so brave as Absolon”. The state of England is compared to Israel because of the political unrest that is gripping the country and the people of England are Jews in Dryden’s opinion who support Absalom’s naive decision to dethrone the monarchical authority and get the throne of England for himself. The Biblical allusion is paralleled with the political scenario of England as the Jews led
This is due to his attempts to make personal gains in the court. As a result, Mr. Danforth possessed predilection in favor of witchcraft accusers. Although an iniquity, Mr. Danforth boasted his own reputation over the lives of other people. This is another insight, demonstrating Abigail’s keen awareness of the attitudes and viewpoints of other characters. Perhaps Mr. Danforth confronted similar obstacles to what Abigail experienced.
Before the play is over good people of pious nature and responsible temper are condemning other good people to the gallows.” Analyzing the book from different perspectives can offer new thoughts on the story. The time period during which the book takes place was a society mainly dominated by men. Men had all the power while
At the beginning of act three, Danforth feels personally threatened when Francis tries to explain his wife’s innocence. “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the jails from Marblehead to Lynn, and upon my signature? … And seventy-two condemned to hang by that signature?” (act three, lines 109-114). Danforth feels as though because he has condemned so many, there is no way he could be wrong in pursuing Rebecca, Francis’ wife.
"The Murder of Charles the Good." Readings in Medieval History. 4th ed. Toronto: Published by University of Toronto Press, 2010. 382-93. Print.
2004 AP English Language & Composition Free-Response Questions: Question 1 In the 1746 letter to his young son, Lord Chesterfield asserts to his son the importance of taking the full advantage of education in achieving excellence through the usage of various rhetorical features such as understatement, irony, and rhetorical questions. Throughout the first paragraph, Lord Chester repetitively uses understatements to establish a tone of sympathy. By acknowledging that parental advice is often“ascribed to the moroseness, the imperiousness, or the garrulity of old age” in lines 3 to 8, Chesterfield seeks to build an illusion of understanding with his son, setting the scene to present his assertions in disguise of friendly advice.
This is particularly apt when considering Carter’s use of gustatory imagery ironically depicting the Marquis as a ‘connoisseur’ and ‘gourmand’ which adds to his sadistic lifestyle and so symbolises control through stripping her with ease like ‘stripping leaves off an artichoke’ and resembling the pornographic image of ‘Rops…Reproof of Curiosity’ sexualising the image of women. Perhaps, Carter presented the Marquis as a ‘connoisseur’ recycling gender stereotypes; the men with their eyes set on women and the women being passive. In addition, she is always forced to wear a collar of rubies with the simile ‘red ribbon like the memory of a wound’ echoes the violent images of cut throats and the guillotine which ironically resembles the tragic end of the previous wives hence almost an invitation to
Danforth is a highly respected judge and is known as a smart and wise man. Danforth tells Giles Corey, a farmer in Salem, who doubts his decision in sending people to jail “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the jails from Marblehead to Lynn, and upon my signature? […] And seventy-two condemned to hang by that signature?” (87). This reveals the amount of power and credibility Danforth has.
Dr. Manette writes a letter to an authority figure explaining what he has seen at the Marquis de Evermonde’s estate. He returns home from the Marquis de Evermonde’s estate, and soon there is a knock on the door. Dr. Manette’s wife “laid her head upon my shoulder, that night when I was summoned out- she had a fear of my going, though I had none” (258). Unfortunately for Dr. Manette, the Marquis and his brother intercept the letter he writes.
Reverend Hale’s dialogue, stage directions, and other people’s perceptions of him reveal a man characterized by self-importance; furthermore, his enthusiasm for the witch trials in the beginning and his misguided
While the Elizabethan era may be regarded as the golden age for English literature, the political treachery and mistreatment of the poor was by far more significant to the history of England. During this era lived a well-known playwright and poet by the name
John Webster, the great Elizabethan dramatist was little admired during his life time. The Elizabethans failed to appraise his genius as a dramatist and after his death he fell for nearly two hundred years into the lap of oblivion to be brought back into the limelight by the criticism of such distinguished critics as Lamb, Swinburne, Rupert Brooke, who popularised his works and establised his claim to be recognised as a great dramatist of Elizabethan age. But now the tide has turned in Webster 's favour and he is recognised today not as a dramatist who carried forward the revenge theme in drama but as a great poet, and above all, a great moralist, who held aloft the moral vision of life at a time when the dramatists of the age were piling horror and glorifying murder into a fine art. This tragedy THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, the revenge is further degraded and the moral motive of the dramatist come to the forefront. There are some influences of other Elizabethan authors.
‘Julius Caesar’ and ‘Henry V’ are plays whose themes are reflective of their respective contextual climates. They were both written in the time of renaissance theatre under the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, who was an avid supporter of Shakespeare’s work. The plays were written consecutively, and they both present historical figures that were greatly idolised in the period in which they were composed. Both history plays convey how, on political scenery, deceit is omnipresent. In Julius Caesar, it is used to bring down the monarchial rule and to ultimately implant a new democratic government, while in Henry V, the King makes use of multiple facets of his personality among which is deceitful behavior in order to conquer France and win over
The large-scale issue of poverty is dated all the way back to the 18th Century and it continues today. To raise awareness about this issue, two very brilliant writers, Jonathan Swift and Fred Grimm used different forms of satire to get their points across. Jonathan Swift is an 18th Century writer, who used Juvenalian satire in his work “A Modest Proposal” to inform the English about the raising number of those in poverty in Ireland. Juvenalian satire is often a bitter, or angry form of satire that criticizes a corruption. Fred Grimm started writing for the Miami Herald in the 20th Century, he used Horatian satire in his column “State budget solution:
Perks of Sarcasm (Chaucer 's Use of Satire to Reach Intended Audience) Geoffrey Chaucer, also known as, “The Father of English Literature,” uses satire in his stories to influence his intended audience. Satire is the use of humor or irony to reveal a person 's stupidity. Considering Chaucer 's stories are legendary, he never fails to through some satire into his writing. With that being said, using it while writing a story is one of the most effective ways of writing.
Reality in the Sarcasm (A Discussion on Chaucer 's usage of Satire to Meet His Agenda.) Geoffrey Chaucer was known as the father of the English Language. During Chaucer 's time in the late 1300’s, he had many issues with the state of how people lived. He used his writing to criticize the societal issues he noticed during his time.