Analysis of the Drying Behavior of Different Solids
Leia Angelie Z. Baccay1, Brigette Elizabeth L. Fernandez1, Emmanuel L. Hipe1, Kim Anne Marie M. Taroy1
1 University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City
Abstract. Drying is one of the most utilized unit operations in different industries. This experiment was aimed at studying the drying behavior of sand, coffee beans, and charcoal. The three materials were weighed and saturated with water after which they dried in an oven while taking their weights periodically. The results showed that the samples’ drying behavior followed the typical drying process. However, only the sand had a distinguishable preheat period. The weight difference before and after drying were found to be 1.06%, 9.32%
…show more content…
The solids will be analyzed at the same temperature and similar moisture amount and container. To analyze the properties that affects drying, the drying curves of each material will be plotted. However, this study will not include discussions about possible chemical reactions in the process and the contribution of types of heat transfer in the drying rate. It is also assumed that the bulk properties of the materials are uniform.
2. Materials and Methodology
The experiment aimed to determine the drying behaviour of sand, coffee beans, and charcoal.
2.1 Preparation of the samples
Approximately 200g of sand was put in a pre-weighed drying tray. The weight of the dry sand and the tray was determined. Water was then poured on the sand until it is saturated with water. The mass of the wet sand together with the tray was determined. The same was done for the coffee beans and charcoal.
2.2 Determination of the drying behavior
For the drying process, the solids were put in an oven which was maintained at around 80 degrees centigrade throughout the drying process. The weight of each sample was determined 10 times after every 3 minutes, 10 times every after 5 minutes, and every after 10 minutes until 3 consecutive weights are determined for each
Prelab week 1 Calculations Preparation of 1.5μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=1.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(1.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.1ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.1ml×1000)μL= 100μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=3μmol/L × 10ml V1=(3μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.2ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.2ml×1000)μL= 200μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=7.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(7.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.5ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.5ml×1000)μL= 500μL Preparation of the blank samples The volumetric flask will be filled to the mark with 150μmole/L of stock solution to act as blank (reference). Additional two blanks will
This experiment had water and the amount as a control as well as the size of the metal were also kept same. the This was why the experiment was repeated multiple times on different days. A standard deviation was found for each element when calorimeter constant and specific heat were calculated. Tuesday was the day with the least amount of deviation which meant it was the day with the most precise when calorimeter constants were compared (Table 1).
In the beginning, the participants measured the diameter of the small coil several times and recorded it to the data. Meanwhile, we calculate the area of the small coil and mark it as well.
To begin with, is the experimental process used to determine the identity of the rock. In doing so one will need to discover the density of the rock. By measuring the rock sample with grams per milliliter is a way used to figure out the density. In starting one will need to measure the mass of the rock using grams. Then using a set milliliter amount of a liquid substance, such as water, one will place the rock sample inside.
Students first prepped for the lab by cleaning out the crucible. Three boiling chips were added in the crucible once it was wiped out with a paper towel. The crucible was then placed on a clay triangle two finger widths above the Fischer burner. After 10 minutes of the crucible being directly under the flame, the it was clean and students allowed time for it to cool down. Next, the students from then on used tongs to transport the crucible from weighing it and back to the clay triangle.
In this experiment, we performed this experiment twice (1st and 2nd rounds) over approximately five month. Twelve male
For this assignment, I decided to read Dry by Augusten Burroughs. Augusten Burroughs, started off from being one of the best advertising suffers from alcoholisms and his book goes into great deal of his journey that eventually led to his recovery. Burroughs, divides his memoir into two parts. In the first part of his book, consists of four chapter. Here we read about how he goes from being one of the top advertisers in New York to later ending up in rehab.
The dehydration of 2-methylcyclohexanol takes place at the bottom of the Hickman still. As the Hickman still heats up within the sand bath, the products evaporate and travel higher up in the still where they condense into a liquid and fall within the collection ring, thus separating the product from the remaining water. Drierite (CaSO4) is also added as a drying agent to absorb any leftover water within the product. The purity of the product will then be analyzed with infrared spectroscopy, paying attention to OH peak if it is present. Chemical Reactions: Data and Observations: Material Volume Mol.
This was done to get more accurate results. The first time the experiment was conducted it was tested at three different time points, at zero minutes, fifteen minutes and
Tube 1 had 1 drop, tube 2 had 2, and each tube after had an additional drop until tube 5. Next, deionized water was placed in each tube. Tube one had 4 drops; tube 2 had 3 drops and the pattern continued until tube 5. After each tube was filled with the glucose and deionized water, the contents were mixed and centrifuged. After the tubes were centrifuged, any pellets formed during the process were removed.
The items that were massed were the evaporating dish, watch glass, and NaCO3. The materials were massed once before and once after being heated in the drying oven. The mass of the evaporating Dish before was 46.57 g; while after being heating was 60.15 g. The mass of the watch glass before was 57.97 g and after was 48.75g. There were two masses taken for the substance NaHCO3- one with the evaporating dish and one without, subtracted out after the lab was concluded. The mass of the substance with the dish was 48.79 g before and 62.33 g after; meanwhile, the mass of the substance without the dish was 2.22 g before and 2.18 g after. The mass of the NaHCO3 had changed after the reaction occurred along with after it was placed on the hot plate and being in the drying oven.
Jerry Sanduski, an assistant football coach for the Penn State, engaging in sexual abuse of children over a period of at least fifteen years. The scandal broke tate Nittany Lions in early November 2011 when Sandusky was indicted on fifty-two counts of child molestation. Although Sandusky's abuse may have begun in the 1970s, he was charged with abuse that occurred between 1994 and 2009. , obstruction of justice, failure to report suspected child abuse, and related charges. The Board of Trustees commissioned an independent investigation by former FBI director Louis Freeh and his law firm.
The temperature of the sulphuric acid was not measured throughout the experiment, however the room in which the experiment was conducted was kept constant, so the chance of any large error due to unknown temperature of the sulphuric acid was most likely reduced. The amount of sulphuric acid used was also controlled by measuring 100mL with a 100mL measuring cylinder to ensure that the results would be consistent. The volume of the agar cubes was calculated from the surface area of each agar cube, both before and after they had been in the sulphuric acid. This increased the reliability of the results as it allowed the rate of diffusion of the sulphuric acid into the agar cubes to be calculated more accurately. The concentration of the acid was 0.1M, which was placed in all three agar cubes to maintain consistency of results.
Experiment 2 Report Scaffold (Substitution Reactions, Purification, and Identification) Purpose/Introduction 1. A Sn2 reaction was conducted; this involved benzyl bromide, sodium hydroxide, an unknown compound and ethanol through reflux technique, mel-temp recordings, recrystallization, and analysis of TLC plates. 2. There was one unknown compound in the reaction that was later discovered after a series of techniques described above.
In this experiment, the amount of water lost in the 0.99 gram sample of hydrated salt was 0.35 grams, meaning that 35.4% of the salt’s mass was water. The unknown salt’s percent water is closest to that of Copper (II) Sulfate Pentahydrate, or CuSO4 ⋅ 5H2O. The percent error from the accepted percent water in CuSO4 ⋅ 5H2O is 1.67%, since the calculated value came out to be 0.6 less than the accepted value of 36.0%.This lab may have had some issues or sources of error, including the possibility of insufficient heating, meaning that some water may not have evaporated, that the scale was uncalibrated, or that the evaporating dish was still hot while being measured. This would have resulted in convection currents pushing up on the plate and making it seem lighter by lifting it up