There are different point of views when the topic comes to war. Some people have different perspectives about war; war is a game or war is brutal fight. The two poems have many similar characteristics, and many different ones. In “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen is about a soldier’s point of view during the war. Whereas “Who’s for the game?” by Jessica Pope is about a person that is trying to get people excited and join World War I. Both of the poems speak about World War I. According to both poems, fighting for your country is a difficult, but necessary, thing to do. In Owen’s poem this is pointed out when he states, “As under a green sea, I saw him drowning. In all my dreams, before my helpless sight, He plunges at me, guttering, choking, and drowning.” This quote shows that the necessary cost to winning a war. Along these lines, in Popes’ poem states, “Who knows it won’t be a picnic – not much-.” These quotes prove that the war will be hard to get through and overcome. …show more content…
In Owen’s poem, though the war may be necessary, it’s not fun or glorious it’s brutal. As you can see, “My friend, you would not tell with such high zest to children ardent for some desperate glory.” This means if you really know what war is like you wouldn’t promote it in a good way. However, this is what Popes’ poem is applying. In her poem she says, “Who would much rather come back with a crutch than lie low and be out of the fun?” She is applying that war is fun and everyone should join to protect our country. There are many ways to look at war. These two poems show similarities and differences about war. One author speaks about the reality of war and how it’s not as glorious as people may think it is. However the other author speaks about how war is a game and everyone should help serve our country, not knowing how bad the war
He was regarded as the unofficial "poet laureate" of the United States. (Note that both the poems are written and set during the World War One.) War is a state of prolonged violent large-scale conflict involving two or more groups of people. It is the most extreme form of collective violence, in the present and the past.
In the poem, “War is Kind,” by Stephen Crane, war is satirized to convey social commentary. Throughout the poem, war is shown both to be happy and kind, and then the reality of it is shown, talking about how violent and gruesome it is. This is similar to the satire Candide, by Voltaire, as well as the short story “The War Prayer,” by Mark Twain. In Candide, the main character experiences many terrible things, one of which is war, and sees the horrible tragedies that no one mentions when talking about war. In “The War Prayer,” an old man gives his views on war and tells the sad reality of how war only hurts people.
People automatically associate war with something terrible but the war can bring advancements that would not have come to light. The title, “The War Works Hard” suggests that the war works hard to inspire people and “build new houses for the orphans (44-45).” So, while Americans place a negative perception on war, Mikhail claims that the war works hard and should be recognized as something positive. On the other hand, “Girl in the War” by Josh Ritter, is a poem that is anti-war. Ritter’s poem is a strong cry against war, he claims that rules that are in the Bible are often ignored.
‘Your country is up to her neck in a fight, And she’s looking and calling for you.’ This quote is from Jessie Pope’s pro-war poem, ‘Who’s for the game’. Poems like this and other propaganda at the time of World War 1 had built a facade that glorified war and overlooked the casualties caused by it. The poem ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ (written by Wilfred Owen), however, contested these views, uncovering these lies and revealing the true horrors of war to the public. In a direct response to Jessie Pope, coming from his own personal experiences, Owen conveys the message: war is not an exciting adventure but an extremely horrific and painful experience, with the use of several language techniques implemented throughout the poem, such as metaphor, personification
Recently in class we discussed 2 poems about war; “The Death of a Ball Turret Gunner” and “Dulce Et Decorum Est”. These 2 poems revolve around a central theme, or rather the irony of the theme: It is sweet and honorable to die for one’s country. We also discussed the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal that took place in Iraq in 2003. This event does share some similar properties when it comes to the topic of war, however, it does not support the theme of the other two poems. It is important to examine writings that share a common theme because it allows the class to view and discuss the same theme from different perspectives.
Both of the poems have a completely different approach towards war and how they express their perception. This is effectively described/interpreted by displaying their own use of literary techniques, use of language and structuring of the poems. Clarke presents her thoughts and ideas extensively throughout
In both texts, the Universal Theme is that war takes away the things we love and hold dear to ourselves. We can see an example of this in Gwendolyn Brooks’ poem, the sonnet-ballad
War is an evil thing, it makes people commit terrible acts, just like lord of the flies, when people are under the control of bad and evil people, it makes the people fighting evil as well, they think they are the ones who are right and have to correct ideals and morals when in reality, they are just being controlled by a higher power. To conclude this argument, “Dulce et Decorum est” By Wilfred Owen is a poem
As a student studying war through a variety of war poems; we reflect on the way in which War poems were usually written to glorify
There is no doubt that both of these poems are fantastic at representing both sides of the argument, with "Dulce et Decorum est" tries to negatively change how you view wars and "The Things that Make a Soldier Great" trying to clear up any misunderstanding regarding
This essay will compare and contrast the way the poets Jessie Pope and Wilfred Owen present war in their poems. Who’s for the game? Was written by Jessie Pope in 1916 during the heart of the First World War. The poem is pro war and is a piece of propaganda that was used to recruit men into the British army. In contrast Dulce et decorum est is an anti war poem and shows the true aspects of war.
The reality remains that there is nothing glorious about the death and destruction that results from war. Establish context: Towards the end of “Dulce et Decorum Est”, the narrator explains how many young men are ready and willing to become a soldier for their country. In fact, this is the last line of the entire poem, when Evidence: “ The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est, pro patria mori” (Owen 27-28). Analysis: This Latin sentence translates into: It is sweet and proper to die for one’s country. It is interesting how Owen capitalizes the word “Lie”, as this emphasizes the deception displayed by those who want young
Comparative Essay How can different perceptions about one topic be expressed in poetry? The main theme that the two sets of poems convey is war, but it’s expressed in different point of views through the use of diction that builds tone. The tones of these poems play a big role in conveying the differences between the different eras that these poems are written in, and shows how societies have changed from the Victorian era till the time of World War I. The diction and tone in Borden and Owen’s poems is so much different than the diction and tone in Lovelace and Tennyson’s poems due to different perspectives and point of views. In all four poems the main idea is war, but each set conveys a perspective of war, a positive perspective
There is a reason many say “war is never the answer.” In the poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, Owen metaphorically speaks about the horrors and brutality of war no one truly understands. His overall purpose is to tell his audience that war is completely unnecessary, and no one should have to risk their life to fight for their country. His use of diction, imagery, and figurative language captures a powerful image of the life effects war has on individuals.
A heroic couplet structure within the poem provides a degree of clarity while still asserting the chaos and cruelness of war. Once again, it can be inferred that Owen himself serves as the speaker. However, this time his audience is more focused on young soldiers and families rather than plainly the public in general. In contrast to the previous work, this poem is set primarily in a World War I training camp, signifying the process young soldiers go through prior to deployment to the front line. The tone of this poem is more foreboding and condemnatory, not only describing the training soldiers but outright degrading their forced involvement as morally wrong.