Duncan V. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd: Case Study
From: Ashlee Nong HCA 340 To: Professor Schipske 06 October 2017 Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., Supreme Court of Arizona 70 P.3d 435, 2003 1. The complete title and citation of the case: Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., 70 P. 3d 435 (2003). 2. Explain which court decided this case: Supreme Court of Arizona decided this case. The Court of Appeals maintained the trial judge's decisions, yet the Supreme Court concurred with Duncan that the Medical Malpractice Act arrangement which bars misbehavior claims in view of battery abuses the Arizona Constitution's assurance for the privilege to sue. 3. How did the case get to the court? Discuss the procedural history of the case The case was brought to court by a woman name Martha …show more content…
What legal issues were decided by the Court in this case? The legal issues were decided by the court in this case were one, whether a drug injection against a patient’s will considers a battery and, two, whether it goes against the Ariozna constitution as a repeal of a patient’s right to collect for personal damages through common …show more content…
On the day of her MRI procedure, June 19, 1998, Ms. Duncan presented herself at Scottsdale Medical Imaging where she underwent an MRI examination. Ms. Duncan requested sedative for her back condition in order to undergo an MRI examination. As Ms. Duncan mentioned prior to her visits at the facility that she only accepts demerol or morphine as the sedation for her procedure. She was assured by a nurse over the phone that she will only be administered by the two drugs mentioned above for her procedure. However, she was administered with fentanyl in lieu of demerol or morphine as she demanded by Nurse Gary Fink, despite the facts that Duncan repeated herself three times that if it is not demerol or morphine then she would have to reschedule her MRI appointment. The administration of fentanyl causes severe allergic reactions to Duncan. 6. What did the Court decide? Give its holding (decision) and the reasons it gave for the decision (reasoning)? As the court found SMI is not responsible for Nurse Fink’s action. Though plaintiff stated a claim for battery but she did agree to the procedure through informed of consent. The court ruled in favor of SMI although plaintiff was being lied to about the drug she was administered with. The court decided to “vacate the court of appeals’ memorandum decision, reverse the judgment of the trial court, and remand the case to the trial court for further
Case Citation: Gallagher V. Cayuga Medical Center
1153 Words | 5 PagesThe Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center case was then appealed by the plaintiffs. Facts: This is a civil case. The Plaintiff of this case is Timothy W. Gallagher, the parent of Jack O’Bannon Gallagher (deceased). Jack was sent to the emergency room after his high school nurse believed he might have abused a substance in which he was acting strangely and had elevated blood pressure. The decedent was omitted into the hospital and was seen by multiple medical professionals who evaluated both his physical health and mental state.
Charles Sell Case Summary
209 Words | 1 PagesThe petitioner’s original bond was revoked after evidence that he was intimidating the witness and after the petitioner screamed and shouted racial slurs at the magistrate judge as well as spit on his face. This behavior furthered supported that Charles Sell was suffering from a delusional disorder. The district court concluded that the decision to involuntarily medicate Charles Sell to restore his health and competence is constitutional. The courts also concluded that the drugs administered must not have any negative effects. They also stated that drugs used were medically appropriate for Charles Sell and it gave him the right to due process and protected his fifth and sixth amendment right to a fair trial.
Farrow's Wrongful Discharge Case Study
1142 Words | 5 PagesFarrow claimed St. Francis’s use of non-nurses to perform such procedures violated Missouri statutes and regulations. The court held that Farrow’s allegations were not so vague, general, or amorphous to warrant summary judgment. St. Francis also argued Farrow was required to report the
Summary Of Costanza Vs Seinfeld
560 Words | 3 PagesCase name and Citation Costanza v. Seinfeld 181 Misc. 2d 562, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County 1999) Parties Michael Costanza, Plaintiff, Jerry Seinfeld, Defendant, Larry David, Defendant, National Broadcasting Company, Defendant, Production companies, Defendant FACTS
What Is The Difference Between Corey Brough Pros And Cons
2062 Words | 9 PagesHuman Right Contraventions: Australia v Brough Teianee-Kai Breznikar 0061072288 University of Southern Queensland Running Head: HUMAN RIGHT CONTRAVENTIONS 2 HUMAN RIGHT CONTRAVENTIONS 5 Word Count: Human Right Contraventions: Australia v Brough The Australian government closely participated in the negotiation of the human rights treaties, these were signed and ratified explicitly recognising the rights of everyone. However, contraventions occur and generally involve one or more members of particular groups in society such as the indigenous, people with disabilities, youth and prisoners.
Appellant Jewell Case Study
403 Words | 2 PagesISSUE: Should Appellant Jewell have been convicted of possessing a controlled substance despite no positive knowledge of such possession, where Appellant had a conscious purpose to avoid learning the truth? RULING: Yes. Trial court conviction was affirmed. Dissent by: KENNEDY,Circuit Judge, with Judges Ely, Hufstedler and Wallace. RATIONALE:
Slaughterhouse Case Decision Of 1873
444 Words | 2 PagesThe Slaughterhouse cases decision of 1873 is a landmark case. A Louisiana ruling gave the Slaughter-House Company special rights to the New Orleans slaughterhouse business. The plaintiffs, a group of butchers sued the state. The case began in 1869, when the Louisiana legislature passed a law creating and granting a monopoly to the Crescent City Livestock Landing & Slaughterhouse Company to slaughter animals in the New Orleans area. A group of local butchers sued Louisiana in state court.
Madrigal V. Quilligan Case Study
252 Words | 2 PagesThe court ruling of the Madrigal v. Quilligan case further illustrated injustice. Dr. Rosenfeld had met with Antonia Hernandez, a new lawyer, and discussed the crimes being committed at the LAC+USC hospital. She assembled ten women that were victims of the forced sterilizations, leading to a class action lawsuit against the hospital. The argument was that the women's’ rights were violated as their constitutional right to bear children had been violated.
Medicare Set Aside Case Study
1635 Words | 7 PagesThe parties have not shifted responsibility of medical treatment, or payment thereof, to Medicare in contravention of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1395y (b). The parties resolved this matter in compliance with both state and federal law. The parties made every effort to adequately protect Medicare’s interest and incorporate such into the settlement terms. Plaintiff and Releasors represent and warrant that all bills, costs or liens resulting from or arising out of Plaintiff’ and/or Releasors’ alleged injuries, claims or lawsuit are Plaintiff’ and Releasors’ responsibility to pay and Plaintiff and Releasors agree to fully satisfy any such bills, costs or liens, including but not limited to any Medicare and Medicaid liens out of the proceeds received from this settlement.
Drope V Missouri Case Summary
1839 Words | 8 PagesIn order for hospital staff to prevent him from becoming harmful to him and others, the treatment team would give him Proxlin Decanoate, an injectable long-acting drug to help him calm down. Rennie went to federal district court to prevent the hospital from giving him any psychotropic medications in the absence of an emergency. Contention of the Parties: The district court denied the violation of the petitioner’s constitutional right to refuse treatment. The court also issued a preliminary injunction directing New Jersey to establish an independent review process that went beyond the procedures that were already put into place by the state. Rennie’s complaint charged the defendants with violating a number of his constitutional rights.
Case Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence
1157 Words | 5 PagesOn balance, the probative value of evidence of Ms. Fitzgerald’s drug use is extremely high and substantially outweighs any risk of either unfair prejudice or undue delay. IV. MS. FITZGERALD’S PRIOR DURG US IS EXEMPT FROM THE PROHIBITON ON HEARSAY UNDER RULE
Stolen Valor Case Study
308 Words | 2 PagesAbel Fields was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act for falsely claiming he had received the Purple Heart. Fields has never served in the military and therefore has never received a military award. At his first trial, Fields was found guilty for violating the Stolen Valor Act and was sentenced to a fine. Fields then appealed his sentence and the Court of Appeals overturned his conviction citing that Fields’ First Amendment rights were violated. The government then appealed the Court of Appeals’ decision and the case was sent to the Supreme Court.
What Is The West Coast Hotel V. Parrish Case
641 Words | 3 PagesWest Coast Hotel vs. Parrish 300 U.S. 379 (1937) Facts A case concerning substantive due process. Elsie Parrish, a chambermaid in a Washington State hotel, was discharged in 1935. She requested back pay for her labor in accordance with the 1913 Washington State Minimum Wages for Women Act, which, authorizes the fixing of minimum wages for women and minors.
Tomcik Case Study
785 Words | 4 PagesThe case I will be concentrating on is Tomcik vs. Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation and Correction in which Tomcik was imprisoned under the custody of Department of Rehabilitation and correction, based on the Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professionals book. The problem stimulated from continuous negligence from nurses and doctors at the department, which initially was when Tomcik received a physical evaluation, included the breast examination by Dr. Evans who stated that the examination was cursory and lasted only a few seconds, which means that not much attention was presented regarding the patient and his job. The next day Tomcik noticed a lump as being about the size of a pea in her right breast, however it was not reported by Dr. Evans.
Tort Case Study: Health Care Law
1368 Words | 6 PagesHealth Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.
More about Duncan V. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd: Case Study
Case Citation: Gallagher V. Cayuga Medical Center
1153 Words | 5 PagesCharles Sell Case Summary
209 Words | 1 PagesFarrow's Wrongful Discharge Case Study
1142 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of Costanza Vs Seinfeld
560 Words | 3 PagesWhat Is The Difference Between Corey Brough Pros And Cons
2062 Words | 9 PagesAppellant Jewell Case Study
403 Words | 2 PagesSlaughterhouse Case Decision Of 1873
444 Words | 2 PagesMadrigal V. Quilligan Case Study
252 Words | 2 PagesMedicare Set Aside Case Study
1635 Words | 7 PagesDrope V Missouri Case Summary
1839 Words | 8 PagesCase Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence
1157 Words | 5 PagesStolen Valor Case Study
308 Words | 2 PagesWhat Is The West Coast Hotel V. Parrish Case
641 Words | 3 PagesTomcik Case Study
785 Words | 4 PagesTort Case Study: Health Care Law
1368 Words | 6 Pages