ipl-logo

Durkheim Social Equality

960 Words4 Pages

In the book The Division of Labor in Society by Durkheim, readers can understand Durkheim’s perspectives on division of labor contrast to Marx’s. In the above passage, the social inequality is the inequality which are embedded in the society as a form of discrimination that is spread and sustained through social institutions. The social inequalities can be extended as justifying why specific individuals are lower social standing or ranks over others. This can effectively determine people’s occupation and social positions. A passage “it is a necessary and sufficient condition for these inequalities neither to be emphasized nor played down through some external cause” describes the external causes as being the societally advantages or disadvantages …show more content…

He points out that the margin of disparity in society grows wider as values of organic solidarity grows larger through industrialization and specialization in works and skills. He points that “the time where the bounds burst, having become too constricting” which means that as the margin of disparity grows substantially, it will one day burst eventually (p.313). In addition, the prejudice or discrimination act as an external inequality in making transmission of money and other forms of status easier in society where organic solidarity is the main system. On the other hand, Durkheim also explains that the external inequalities disrupt the main purpose of organic solidarity. This can occur by not synchronizing individuals to specific functions that are assigned to them. This will eventually result in slowing the individuals from specializing at their highest …show more content…

Marx argues that due to division of labor and class struggle, “man comes to objectify himself through this mere one-dimension he has created and identifies with” (Marx p.475). The class struggle resulted from division of labor created an inequality where some will own the means of production, and the lower class who provides or sells their labor or “self” to survive working for those owners of means of product. This two groups are simply explained as bourgeoisies and proletariats by Marx. As the industrialization and society modernizes, the inequality will prevail observably. Marx argues that the proletariats will revolt against bourgeoisies and lead to the fall of capitalism and rise of communism. Marx’s point of view of social change is for social interest and getting rid of class exploitation once the proletariats remove the bourgeoisies from the top of the social and economic chain. Unlike Marx who focuses on the class struggle and the rapid social changes, Durkheim points out that it should be don’t only as far as necessary. According to Marx, “we conclude that it is not good to push specialization as far as possible, but only as far as necessary” arguing that the specialization should not be pushed to the possible limit, but only to what is necessary and not over pushing it (Durkheim 334). Unlike Marx, Durkheim argues that the

Show More
Related

  • In Dubious Battle Mob Quotes

    688 Words  | 3 Pages

    “People have said, mobs are crazy, you cant tell what they do.’ Why don’t people look at mobs as men, but as mobs? A mob nearly always seems to act reasonable, for a mob.” Says John Steinbeck in his major work, In Dubious Battle.

    Read More

  • The Dangerous Consequences Of Growing Inequality Chuck Collins Analysis

    1161 Words  | 5 Pages

    “The Dangerous Consequences of Growing Inequality” was written by author Chuck Collins in 2005. The main thesis of the essay was that a greater amount of inequality causes us to undermine the values of society, along with consequences that affect an indivual’s life. Collins expands on his main point by splitting up the consequences into different categories. To be more specific, he gives different examples on how the growing inequality impacts society, and more specifically, our culture, economy, social order, and democracy. Collins starts off by explaining how homes are affected when there is a change in the economy.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

    Read More

  • What Is The Effect Of The Industrial Revolution In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    1337 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Industrial Revolution cast its shadow upon European cities and towns. Some enjoyed this shade while others suffered tremendously because of it. Those who enjoyed the luxuries and wealth that the Industrial Revolution provided, the bourgeoisie, depended on the needs of the poor, the proletarians, to increase the size of their monstrous factories and ultimately their wealth and influence. In “The Communist Manifesto” Karl Marx discusses the effects of the Industrial Revolution in further dividing society by creating new social and economic hierarchies. In addition to his observation of the division of labor, Karl Marx believed, that due to the technological shift from craftsmanship to machinery this also caused division of labor and the appreciation of proletarian handmade goods was disregarded.

    Read More

  • The History Of Class Conflicts In Karl Marx And Engels

    764 Words  | 4 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class theory lies upon the premise that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." He meant by this that ever since the inception of modern human society, people have been always divided into classes which are in conflict with each other due to class interests. An argument against class interests is that they are not given ab initio, they arise out of exposure of people occupying different social positions in varying social contexts. Karl Marx and Engels divided the masses into three broad classes, the proletariats, the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie.

    Read More

  • Adam Smith Social Inequality Essay

    1169 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the discussion of social inequality, one cannot leave out the sociological theories and models proposed by Karl Marx and Adam Smith. Generally, social inequality refers to the presence of unequal treatment, opportunities and rewards tied to people of various social standings within the hierarchy of a community group or society. Some common types of social inequality include wealth and income disparity as well as social class stratification. For Marx and Smith, both had explored the various types of social inequality in society.

    Read More

  • The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels

    996 Words  | 4 Pages

    The philosophers expand on how the bourgeoisie's goal in this capitalist society is to increase wealth and profit whereas they then must figure out how to increase production, outpace their competition, and invent more efficient tools for manufacturing. Whereas, they end up over-exploiting the low working class by trying to gain as much value. In addition, this quote stated, “ He becomes an appendage of the machine” (pg,18), which means that when workers are alienated from the products they create and from the whole process they become alienated from their humanity, dehumanizing them more into a tool than a human. On the other hand, the proletarians were still forced into doing even unpleasant jobs since they had zero bargaining power against the bourgeoisie to demand better wages and working conditions. Karl Marx says, “ therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases,” showing his observation on how capitalism leads to the exploitation of workers impacting the proletarians who now had to work twice as hard, like taking more shifts.

    Read More

  • Communist Manifesto Thesis

    725 Words  | 3 Pages

    The objective of Karl Marx, was to abolish the bourgeois property in which was private property, hence capital and wage labor. Capital and wage-labor are the essence of property and Marx explains how capital is a collective product of members who have a social status. With wage-labor, the laborer is kept at minimum wage creating surplus value keeping the laborer at bare existence, only to increase capital. Under a Communist society, once Communism is establish it will remove private property as stated, “From the moment when labor can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent, into social power capable of being monopolized.” In essence, the problem with capitalism is that it creates a condition for the bourgeois placing property in to the existence of few hands, just how Marx claimed that capital is social power.

    Read More

  • Industrial Revolution Effects On Women

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    Industrialization also enhanced the capitalism which is focused on the issue of more profit and conflict between capital and workers. While owner of productions take more profit with less labor, workers take less profit even with much more labor force. Karl Marx is one of the thinkers who criticizes this situation of capitalism in terms of workers and capitals in industry, especially he focuses on the situation of

    Read More

  • What Is Karl Marx Theory Of Exploitation

    1074 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to Edwards et al. (2006) Marx thought that within capitalism there would be an increased divide between the bourgeoisie class and the proletariat class in the future. The proletariats are lower of the two classes, the people who have to work for wages in order to survive. The bourgeoisie are the people in society who controlled and owned the means of production in a capitalist system.

    Read More

  • What Are The Stages Of The Communist Manifesto

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    A conflict between the proletariat and bourgeois develops and grows sharper until a point is reached where it culminates in a social revolution. The proletariat will raise themselves to the position of ruling class, and then use their power to discharge all capital from the bourgeoisie and centralize all means of production to the state, or the proletariat (workers) united as the ruling class. In place of a bourgeoisie society or class-antagonisms based society, there will be a communist society where a free development of each is the condition for the free development of all. For Marx, this will be the final stage of

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Karl Marxism

    870 Words  | 4 Pages

    It also accounts for the great divide between the the bourgeoisie who control the means of production and society in general and the working class who struggle to survive by the bourgeoisie. They are the “slaves of the bourgeoisie class, of the bourgeois State; they are in daily and hourly thralldom to the machine, to the foreman, and above all, to the individual bourgeois manufacturer” (Marx & Engels, 11). The laws, justified systems, and government established and run by bourgeoisie members protect the interests of only the its people and exclude those of the working class, hence the class struggle and the creation of class. The people in power control the people below them and subject them to fulfilling their interests with the illusion of ascending the socioeconomic hierarchy. This process strips the working class out of their individuality and humanity, making them mere commodities and part of the capitalist system in Coketown and Western nations at large during the Industrialization

    Read More

  • Social Class And Social Inequality

    1443 Words  | 6 Pages

    Social classes are a form of social stratification that refers to the existence of structured inequalities between individuals and groups in society. A social class is a group of people of comparable status, power and wealth which are usually classified as upper class, middle class, and lower class. For each class, there are some specific opportunities available that influence their social life. We can understand about the particularity of the chances through unequal distribution of these opportunities between individuals in social classes. In here belonging to a social class seems to be an obstacle for some individuals to obtain equal opportunity, unlike upper class people.

    Read More

  • Marxism And Social Class

    777 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this quote, Marx describes that elements that contribute to the productivity of the existing capitalist society, are also the source of the society’s existing instability and issues. For Marx, the material productive forces are the workers and the tools or methods used in the production process. The existing relations of production refers to the way society is organized as a result of the production. More specifically, society is divided into social classes. In the first sentence, Marx states that in a political economy, workers reach a point in which they don’t agree with their position in the society or with the property relations in the system.

    Read More

  • Emile Durkheim Essay

    1433 Words  | 6 Pages

    In this essay I will aim to explain first, how organic solidarity came to existence because of increasing division of labour in society. To begin with I will take a peek into Durkheim’s background and see how his interest was developed in this field. The next few paragraphs will focus on the phenomenon of ‘division of labour’ and how it affects solidarity in individuals. Next I will look into features of traditional societies and mechanical solidarity and then onto features of modern societies and organic solidarity. In the end I will try to explore the concerns that have been left unaddressed in Durkheim’s theory of ‘division of labor’.

    Read More

More about Durkheim Social Equality

Open Document