Duty Of Care Theory
Question 1 Duty of care can be defined as ‘the lawful duty to prevent causing any harm or injury by taking reasonable care.’ There will be a breach of duty of care owed towards the claimant if there is an act or omission that causes the harm or injury. The neighbour principle is where an individual able to reasonably foresee that his or her actions might cause physical harm or injury to another individual or property of others, thus there will be a duty to take reasonable care in most circumstances (Law & Martin (ed.) 2013, p. 187). In the well-known case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, Lord Atkin developed a principle known as the ‘neighbour principle’ to determine when duty of care might arise. The extent to which a duty of care exists will be subject to the relationship between the parties as well as the different circumstances of the case (Law & Martin (ed.) 2013, p. 188). The courts in Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 have developed a three tier test to establish the existence of a duty of care. At the earliest formulation of the duty of care concept in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, the elements of foresight as well as proximity were present in the 1932 decision. The plaintiff, Mrs Donoghue, alleged that she and a friend went to a cafe. Her friend had purchased a bottle of ginger beer for her consumption. …show more content…
Therefore, foreseeability along with proximity continues to be the main elements in the duty of care concept today (Steele 2010, p. 148). The significance of this case is that it recognized a general tort of negligence through the judgment of Lord Atkin in particular. Thus, it is not confined to situations of specific duty (Steele 2010, p. 147). Generally Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 is recognized to be initiating the process where a general tort of negligence
R. V. Saulte Ste Case Study
1403 Words | 6 PagesThis essay will be organized by answering the questions in chronological order; to which in the first question, I will be looking heavily into the case of R.v. Saulte Ste. Marie and Roach. It will incorporate the regulatory offences and the mental blameworthiness and how strict liability acts as a balance between the two. It will also include the defence of due diligence.
Martin Lewis Case Study
1280 Words | 6 PagesState Bank of Lombard, 125 Ill.2d 203, 215-16, 126 Ill.Dec. 519, 531 N.E.2d 1358 (1988) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314 (1965)), in addressing the duty of care element of negligence by a landowner. The court found no duty of care exists to protect others from criminal activities by third persons unless a “special relationship” exists between the parties. Zeroing in on the special relationship language, the court found that even if a special relationship exists between parties, in Illinois a landowner’s liability extends only to “physical harm” caused by acts of third persons. Marshall, 222 Ill.2d at 437, 305 Ill.Dec. 897, 856 N.E.2d 1048 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344 (1965)). The court further distinguishes special relationship as business invitor and invitee.
The Case Of Maynard Et Al. V. Snapchat, Inc.
1441 Words | 6 PagesThe third element of a negligence claim, causation, requires the breach of duty to be the proximate cause of the damages sustained by the plaintiff. Although the lower courts found McGee’s reckless driving to be an intervening act that broke the chain of causation, the intervening-cause rule “does not insulate the defendant if the defendant had reasonable grounds for apprehending that such [an] act [of a third party] would be committed.” Colvin wrote that
Mapp V. Ohio Case
899 Words | 4 PagesIn the light of the sentiment presented above, this paper discusses the circumstances that led to the case being heard in court. It explores the events that took place at each level of the case, the issues addressed
2.1 Explain Theories And Values That Underpin Own Practice
2657 Words | 11 Pages2.2. Evaluate how duty of care contributes to safeguarding or protection of individuals and support individuals’ rights and choices. Duty of care requires you to promote the safety and wellbeing of individuals and prevent them from coming to any harm. Duty of care ensures that healthcare workers act only in the best interest of the
Disadvantages Of Tort
972 Words | 4 PagesDuty - is the first element of negligence which refers to the legal obligation imposed on someone requiring them to adhere to a certain standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could harm
3.2 Explain The Main Points Of Agreed Procedures For Handling Complaints Essay
861 Words | 4 Pages1.1 Explain what it means to have a duty of care in own work role. Duty of care means to have a legal responsibility towards others. It is a legal requirement that all health care workers must put the interest of their service users first and make sure that the service users do not come to any harm be it abuse or self-harm. As a care giver, my duty is to provide care according to the organisation’s code of practice in my day to day work, to make sure that my service users are supported and treated with dignity and respect by following the policies and procedures set out by my employer, it is my duty of care to involve service user in their care unless it is not possible for them to be involved. Service should be provided in a safe environment
Wrongful Death Case: The Hill V. Ohio County
165 Words | 1 PagesThe Hill v. Ohio County involves a wrongful death case in which the hospital refused to admit Juanita Monroe. She thought she was in labor. As a result, she delivered her child at home without medical attention and died shortly after giving birth. The plaintiff was Lorene Hill, administer of Monroe’s estate, against Ohio Country Hospital. The question arises whether there was a breach of duty by the hospital in accordance to the institution’s admission policy.
3.1 Explain What Is Meant By The Term Duty Of Care
485 Words | 2 PagesExplain what is meant by the term of 'duty of care': Duty of care is when we must follow the correct policies and procedures in order to protect and safeguard children from any harm. This means that we have a respnsibility to do daily health and safety checks on all equipment that children are likely to use encase any of it is broken, we must carry our risk assessments in order to make sure that all work areas and play areas are safe for children to use and also most importantly we must carry out fire drills so that children are familiar with the sound of the fire alarm, aware on where they have to go in order to reach safety and what they have to do. Upholding the rights of children and young people:
Examining Wednesbury's Unreasonableness In Public Decision Making
1460 Words | 6 PagesHere a compensation tribunal was set up to compensate the families of victims who had died in the Stardust tragedy. The grieving father of one victim sought a review of a decision made by the tribunal to award the mother of a victim compensation and the father no compensation. The court refused to quash the decision of the tribunal and, strangely, agreed that there were circumstances which justified awarding of compensation to one parent and not the other. This decision was made by a court which was quite critical of the approach taken by Lord Diplock in GCHQ. Henchy J. said he would be ‘slow to test reasonableness by seeing if it accords with logic’ and would be ‘equally slow’ to accept the moral standard criteria believing it a vague and inconsistent principle to base reasonableness on.
Equity And Rule Of Law: Is Equity More Determinate
894 Words | 4 PagesAbstract This article critically considers whether Equity has developed and is now more determinate in relation to the propositions involved in the quote made by Professor Matthew Harding. To fully consider this topic, the article is going to look at the views of different judges and commentators as well as discussing the relevant case law. The article will talk about conscience, equitable maxims, and imperfect gifts. The fusion theory will also be mentioned to determine if Equity is as certain as Common Law.
Reynolds V Clarke (1833)
1896 Words | 8 PagesLord bridge stated that what emerged was that in addition to the existing rule of foreseeability, for duty of care to arise there should exist between whom the duty is owed and the party owing the duty proximity and the situation one in which the court considers just, fair and
Dworkin's Theory Of Discretion
788 Words | 4 PagesDworkin and Judicial Discretion, Philosophy of law, last accessed from http://www.yellowpigs.net/philosophy/dworkin on 02 April 2016 4. Dworkin, Ronald, (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, London,
Essay On Giving Of Reason
2498 Words | 10 PagesThe entitlement to reasons is not only an ‘indispensable part of a sound system of judicial review’, as Professor Wade described it, but also ‘a healthy discipline for all who exercise power over others’ There are two basic underlying reasons for giving reasons: first, a general objective of fairness in the decision making process. Second, the facilitating of judicial review. Furthermore, the giving of reasons acts as a defense against arbitrary decision making, the practice of partisanship in our courts and it aids hugely in the appeals process. The three main sources of a duty to give reasons (The
Holmes The Common Law
1297 Words | 6 PagesEven with all the criticisms levelled at it, The Common Law remains an instructive and pioneering book that has by no means lost its essential power. A work of such insight transcends temporal bounds and is — or at least should be — rediscovered anew by successive generations. The work is not static. It bends, and is bent by, each new audience that encounters it. As Holmes wrote in a letter to Harold Laski in 1919, he — Holmes — “started all the inquiries that since have gone over many matters therein.
More about Duty Of Care Theory
R. V. Saulte Ste Case Study
1403 Words | 6 PagesMartin Lewis Case Study
1280 Words | 6 PagesThe Case Of Maynard Et Al. V. Snapchat, Inc.
1441 Words | 6 PagesMapp V. Ohio Case
899 Words | 4 Pages2.1 Explain Theories And Values That Underpin Own Practice
2657 Words | 11 PagesDisadvantages Of Tort
972 Words | 4 Pages3.2 Explain The Main Points Of Agreed Procedures For Handling Complaints Essay
861 Words | 4 PagesWrongful Death Case: The Hill V. Ohio County
165 Words | 1 Pages3.1 Explain What Is Meant By The Term Duty Of Care
485 Words | 2 PagesExamining Wednesbury's Unreasonableness In Public Decision Making
1460 Words | 6 PagesEquity And Rule Of Law: Is Equity More Determinate
894 Words | 4 PagesReynolds V Clarke (1833)
1896 Words | 8 PagesDworkin's Theory Of Discretion
788 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Giving Of Reason
2498 Words | 10 PagesHolmes The Common Law
1297 Words | 6 Pages