India is known for the numerous dynasties in the past that played a role in shaping what it is today. From the Mughals to the Marathas to the Delhi Sultanate to the Vijayanagar Empire, these different kingdoms played a role in shaping India’s history as well as the history of judicial administration. With the religious diversity in India, we see India under the rule of both Hindu and Muslim rulers. One might assume that thus, the rules under the Muslim rulers might be similar and that of the Hindu rulers might be similar. In contrast to that assumption, the data supplied below proves that even though the Mughal Dynasty and Delhi Sultanate both had Muslim rulers, the judicial administration were dissimilar. Likewise, even though the Vijayanagar …show more content…
The rulers had well-functioning administrative systems and the king was the ultimate authority. This dynasty prevailed for 3 centauries and was said to be a tolerant and accepting dynasty. The administrative system was just and tolerant. The king focused on the welfare of his subjects and had a council of six to eight ministers to assist him. These ministers were chosen from each caste of the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishya’s. There was a governor who exercised military, judicial and civil power. The empire was based on the monarchy form of government and was traditional in nature. The king was the highest court of appeal. Though he was the highest court of appeal, he could not give his full attention to the court and thus set up a series of courts in different provinces. The courts were called sabha and were divided into Mukhya (which transacted business regularly) and Amukhya. A ‘Shastrita’ court was a court where the emperor himself presided over the cases. It can be noted that the courts created were not like the modern ones. The judges were drawn from the village caste population and understood the grievances of the …show more content…
They ruled in the western Deccan plateau of India and became prominent only under the rule of Shivaji in the 17th century. Shivaji was a great ruler and numerous people looked up to him. He was popular and ruled with the advice of his ministers. They were committed to establishing a Hindu state and hindu political power in the subcontinent of India. The dynasty was governed by ministers called Pradhaans. The Nyayadhish was the highest legal authority and known as the chief justice. There was also a pandit who was responsible for solving disputes like religious customs, formal education and so on. Shivaji collected two taxes called ‘Chauth’ and ‘Sardeshmukhi’ of which one was a military contribution. When it came to the administration of justice, the system of justice was simple, primeval and rudimentary. It was rather simple, basic and to the point. The highest court was termed ‘Hazar Majils’ or the king’s court. The administration of day to day events was carried out by the panchayat. The Patel of the village played a role
The Gupta Empire however took the opposite approach. Their government was similar to the Persian Empire in the sense that it was divided into provinces. Each province had viceroys who were governors responsible for the administration of the province. The provinces were divided into districts which had its own local administration. The local government was essentially free from central control.
The right to vote and hold office was limited to male church members. In local affairs, the General Court developed powers and a structure similar to England’s Parliament. It had two houses: the House of Assistants and the House of Deputies. Also,
He was also considered a deity descended from the sun who in theory owned everything. The Empire was a federalist system with four provinces (Chinchay Suyu (NW), Anti Suyu (NE), Kunti (SW), and Qulla Suyu (SE)) and a central government centered on the Sapa Inca. The four corners of the provinces meet at Cusco, the capital. Each province had a governor who oversaw local who supervised agriculturally-productive river
Consequently, Suleiman developed a good reputation in the eyes of the public, as they were able to gain power in society for only being a moral individual. Furthermore, the Delhi Sultanate allowed for Hindus to work government jobs, weren’t forced to pay the expensive jizya tax bestowed upon by other major Western Muslim empires, and were able to support the economy in their partake in the job system (OI). As a result,
The kings led the empires, the doctors kept people healthy, the judges maintained order, the traders helped the economy and so on. Without these roles, there would have been anarchy and chaos. Structure kept each empire together, because without it, the society would have broken down. They would’ve had to have been advanced enough to form a system and keep people in line. If everyone knew what role they had to play, it would have made it a lot easier for the
Each council would have a kind of leadership group within it. 4 members would be chosen who would lead, and out of those there would be the leader of the city. This leader would not only control the city but the surrounding area to. Although the nobility provided leadership, they weren 't automatically put in government
The Egyptian hierarchy was like the pyramids that they built. At the very top was the pharaoh and their gods. Under the pharaoh and the other gods, there was a chief minister call a ‘vizier’ that watched over tax collection, and monitored the government records that were kept by the scribes.
The Assyrians governed lads closest to Assyria as provinces and made them dependent territories. The Assyrian kings chose their rulers or had supportive kings who aligned themselves with Assyria. The Assyrian system of having local governors report to a central authority became the fundamental model of administration, or system of government management. Additionally, military campaigns added new territories to the empire. These additional lands brought taxes and tribute to the Assyrian territory.
Zhu Yuanzhang led a very strong and powerful army to take control of the Yuan Dynasty and they were successful. That led them to gain power. They consolidated by trading and it was even more beneficial to them since they were in Asia and near the water so it was easy for them to use boats to travel and trade. They also secured their borders from their enemies by building the Great Wall of China. They managed to maintain power by allowing everyone in the empire freedom of religion and fair rules and they had good economic income from trading.
This led to formation of a unique culture, which they created by taking in elements of other cultures and blending them into theirs. With the division of provinces they were able to carry this out successfully. Even though they were the conquerors they were recognized to be carrying out peaceful trading which led to economic prosperity within the nation. They held truth in high esteem; telling a lie was a most disgraceful thing that a person could do. Good thoughts and deeds mattered the most in the empire.
The two empires share many traits, but they also differ in many ways. However, although similar, the Ottoman empire and Mughal empire are fundamentally different because of their view on religious tolerance, utilization of military successes, and women’s rights. To begin, the Ottoman and Mughal empires differ greatly in
POLITICAL • Tawantinsuyu: Inca government, monarchy, ruled by the Sapa Inca • Sapa Inca: emperor and king of the Inca Empire, means “sole ruler”, most powerful person in the empire • Coya: wife and queen of Sapa Inca • Government Organization: - Viceroy: most trusted and closest advisor to the Sapa Inca, usually a close relative - High Priest: thought to be second in power due to the heavily regarded importance on religion - Governors of a Quarter: Inca Empire divided into four quarters, each ruled by a governor called an Apu - Council of the Realm: council made up of powerful, noble men who advised the Sapa Inca on important matters and assisted in major problems - Inspectors: people who were in charge to watch over the townspeople to make sure they paid their taxes -
Since 1500, countries have pursued a policy of expansion known as imperialism for a variety of reasons. Those reasons lead to both negative and positive effects. The effects can be viewed from different perspectives. One country that was a major in Imperialism was Great Britain.
Noticing that the empire had grown to a size that was uncontrollable by one leading power, the Persians disassembled the empire into satrapies─small portions of the empire that were monitored by regionalized magistrates, called satraps. These satraps, typically due to their relationship with the king, were appointed to overview a satrapy, and to collect taxes or men for war. Comparably, the Maurya Empire recognized the ever-increasing need for a new system of control, thus the Mauryans separated the empire into multiple provincial structures, in which spies, disguised as common townspeople, would enforce the law as well as collect taxes. Both the Persian and Maurya Empire deemed it necessary, due to the rapidly growing enormity of their empires and the consequential receding amount of control that their bureaucracies had, that they needed to be broken up into different sections. These sections, in both empires, would be monitored by the king’s appointees, allowing the king to neglect simple tasks that he would otherwise have to do, which, in turn, would slow each empire’s overall progress, and instead focus on larger issues that would not only benefit the entirety of each empire, but would also allow for progress to
The legal implications and feasibility of integrating the Syariah courts into the federal judicial system through restoration of Article 121 of Federal Constitution Prior to 1988, Article 121(1) of Federal Constitution provided as follows: Subject to Clause (2) the judicial power of the Federation shall be vested in two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction and status, namely— (a) one in the States of Malaya, which shall be known as the High Court in Malaya and shall have its principal registry in Kuala Lumpur; and (b) one in the States of Sabah and Sarawak, which shall be known as the High Court in Borneo and shall have its principal registry at such place in the States of Sabah and Sarawak as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may determine;