An unannounced follow up inspection was conducted on 11/17/2015. I arrived at the operation which is located at 1408 N. Edwards Ave, Mt Pleasant about 3:33 pm. I was greeted by Ashley Earl the director I then explained the purpose of my inspection. I prepared for the inspection by reviewing the frequency of inspections made, observing the operations, compliance history, the operations fee history, background check list and controlling person list, etc. Director present: yes Director qualifications: Ashley Earl qualifies under 746.1015(a)(1) non expiring, not evaluated at the inspection. A walk through of the operation was conducted. The playground was not observed as was raining at my inspection. Background checks: current Risk Evaluations: …show more content…
During the walk through I observed Kelsey Reichman and Michelle Jones were caring for 6 infants 6 weeks-14 months. Six week old was asleep in crib on her back while other 5 children were on floor playing. Ashley Brown and Jessica Edwards were caring for 13 children 3 and 4 years old, Ashley was leading circle time at inspection. Leeane Jobe and Shelbe Derrick were caring for 16 children age 4 and 5 as they were in centers throughout the room. Hope Ponder and Chrysal Flagaipupu were caring for 12 children who were 2 years old. Hope was leading circle time while Chrysal was assisting a child in the restroom. Kayla Swafford and Chalet Insall were caring for 14 children ages 17 months-2 years old. The children were seated at the tables while the teachers assisted with art. Camy Roca and Bretley and Beasley were caring for 3 children 12 months-17 months. Camy was reading a book to the children. Transportation: does not offer transportation at this time No photos were taken at inspection. Findings: No deficiencies were found with the minimum standard rules. The 2936 was reviewed by Ms. Earl and a copy was printed and emailed. Djuana Thomas was present at inspection and received a copy of
The request for clarification was forwarded to the program for action. The version of the paragraph provided by the program was not approved by the program Director as he considered it still unclear. I was asked to provide feedback. I provided
JOB KNOWLEDGE Search Warrant Planning & Procedures Officer Penrose has been a member of the Red Team since October of 2015. He has learned what is expected and required in regards to this area of the assignment. Officer Penrose has planned 24 search warrant operations during this rating period. He is familiar with what is needed in a search warrant entry plan and what areas are likely to cause problems or concerns. Officer Penrose plans for most of these problem areas and informs me of them during his planning phase.
On behalf of LTC Holliday, I 'm requesting key logistics personnel from Vectrus, S&S, and Medical (Preventive Medicine) to conduct a site visit in Zone 7 IOT determine the suitability of the temporary water storage site. All personnel will meet up in DOL bldg. 306 on 23MAR16 at 1030 or 1600 IOT carpool to the designated location. Please, reply back to SFC White IOT provide us w/ a consensus for one of the proposed time slots.
• Discuss any problems which you are experiencing in meeting the objectives of our program. • Describe equipment, or other significant purchases (over $100), made with Title V funds during this reporting period for our program. • Summarize all travel paid with Title V funds for this reporting period. •
Also I will send you the claims for reprocessing. Claim # 0681412824308 for dates of service 5/06/2013-5/11/2013 billed amount $24,480.00 Was also received timely from the provider, are you able to reprocess this claim because it was billed to
I have filled in for Central Registry and Non-IV-D several times during the years. I have also served on the functional design team for CAFÉ. I continue to do each of these while serving as contract monitor for eleven district attorney’s offices. In addition to the experience gained in the policy unit, I have also served as a Store Manager for Radio Shack #01-8238.
The agency I did my interview at is called Safe Alternatives For Everyone(SAFE). On the morning of Friday April 28th, I took a tour of the facility and conducted the interview at 28910 Pujol St Temecula, CA. (951) 587-3900. The funny thing is this facility is located on the street that I would take my dog for a walk and I would always see the facility, but I wasn’t curious as to what that building was about.
Fuller and Strath (2001) conducted a quantitative research study that examined local populations of early education organizations based on the 1990 household census data to report features of the early childhood workforce nationwide. Multiple economic and regulatory forces shaped the population of early education organizations that operated within states and local communities. The median center-based teacher was 34 years of age, reported having completed some college, and was married. The median family childcare home provider had a high school diploma. Fifteen percent of all preschool teachers in urban areas were African American and 8% were Latina.
During this developmental interview, I chose to conduct an observation/interview study with my one of my cousin’s child. This child is a 4 year old girl and will be identified as “child K” in relation to her first name. Her parents had no problem letting me interview her, but I had them stay in the same room as us. The purpose of this interview was to observe the child’s physical, cognitive, and socioemotional development. I observed her behavior and gave her several tests to show how well she has progressed.
The room was calm and the children all seemed happy and content with their new key workers. Charmaine and Joyce will be closing monitoring and supporting the staff to ensure this transition period is a smooth as possible for parents and children. 2-3 The environment has much improved offering children a wide variety of learning experiences that are allowing the children to explore paint water and sand and cosy areas for relaxation that also have a wide variety of books for the children to look at and mark making resources. Staff are continuing to develop their planning to ensure it is responsive and relevant.
Person interviewed: Child 's Seit Provider Date and Time of interview: November
Contact: Jennifer Benton, Chief Executive Officer, 239-939-2553 or
This might include people like teaching assistants or Sen TA to provide support and train staff. These can be one on one for children each day to help them. Assitive Technology - This could be where a child may not be able to hold a pen or write but they could use maybe an ipad to use a speical txt typing programme, this could also be they have special hear aids to hear. Health Visitors - These are usually seen to check the weigh and height how well being of a child they can sometimes monitor a child if they are in need of any help.
STANDARD 4: ASSESSMENT OF THE CHILD PROGRESS Artifact; Compering Early Childhood Assessment from Child Development 201 I chose this artifact because it is about the appropriate Early Childhood assessments while these have a variety of programs to choice depending on the needs of the child to help him to the next level I learned that there are many resources for the teacher to help children out so they can have a happy childhood; These all examples bellow guidance a center to set up the whole program of early childhood environment so it will be helpful for the provider education to have cozy a safety place for young children.
Name: _______Aly Daniels_____________________ Classroom: __Inclusive_Preschool ________ Time and Date: ___3/20/18__9:00-11:00_______ Primary Focus for Activity (check one): ____ Physical ____ Social/emotional _X___ Cognitive ____ Language Purpose: The purposes of the lab experiences are: to identify and apply developing teaching skills by engaging a an individual child or group of children in a learning experience; to identify and apply knowledge of child development milestones and processed across all domains through observation, and to identify and apply High Scope key developmental indicators (or other professional standards) exhibited in specific experiences. 1. Name of the engaged experience and description: