ipl-logo

Economic Welfare: Monopoly Vs. Perfect Competition

2286 Words10 Pages

Economic Welfare: Monopoly v. Perfect Competition
1. Introduction
Societal welfare or economic welfare is a level of success and standard of living of an individual or group of people. In the field of economics, it refers to the utility, i.e. the measure of the first choice over sets of goods and services, gained through the accomplishment of goods and services. In other words, it is a part of social prosperity that can be attained by economic activities.
2. Criteria of Economic Welfare
Two criteria of Economic welfare are consumer surplus and producer surplus. Consumer surplus measures the economic welfare from the perspective of buyer and producer surplus measures the economic welfare from the perspective …show more content…

It enjoys economies of scale and then the benefits are passed to the buyers. Monopolies make a great profit and hence can be used for research and developmental purposes. It makes use of its quality of discriminating costs hence benefiting the weaker section of society. Monopolies can manage to pay for latest technology and machinery. They can provide income to the government in the form of heavy taxes they pay (Bacchiega, 2011).
9. Disadvantages of Monopoly
Disadvantages include the carrying out of services in such a way that it sets poor standards. It exploits the demands of the consumer. Usually, what happen is that product formed by the monopoly is not formed by any other company and hence the customer has to decide between quality and pricing. Also, the reduced completion results in bad quality and outdated products.
10. Perfect Competition
Perfect competition, an economic ideal, is a condition which prevails in a market in which customers and sellers are too large in number and better informed that all essentials of monopoly can get absent and the market price of a product is away from the control of individual consumers and sellers. In economics, the perfect market is the one in which several conditions collectively make a perfect …show more content…

Disadvantages of Perfect Competition
Some of the disadvantages of perfect completion are that there is no scope for economies of scale as a large number of firms is in there (Eiteman, 2010). Homogenous products decrease the variation of product in the market. With perfect knowledge, there is no incentive to produce new technology. Lack of supernormal profits means the investment in research and development is unlikely.
14. Monopoly & Perfect Competition
Now monopoly and perfect competitions are two separate and entirely different concepts but similarities can be found between them, for example, there cost functions are the same. The number firm is large in both the markets. The freedom of entry and exit exist in both the markets. Competition between firms can be found in both monopoly and perfect competition. Marginal cost and marginal revenue can be equated in both the markets. In both markets, there are chances of profits and losses. And both companies minimize cost and maximize the profit.
15. Discrepancies between the perfect competition and monopoly
Discrepancies between the perfect competition and monopoly are given below.
15.1. Marginal revenue and

Show More
Related

  • Why Did The Number Of Corporations Increase In The Late 1800s

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    Define corporation. Pg. 422 Corporation is an organization that is authorized by law to carry on an activity on an activity but treated as though it were a single person. Define economies of scale.

    Read More

  • The Impact Of Monopolies During The Gilded Age

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    During the Gilded Age there was a lot of monopolies, because we haven't discovered anything yet. SO the U.S needed a lot, which impacted us a lot. Monopolies were probably had the biggest impact on the Gilded Age. Vanderbilt had a monopoly for a while, and when we .thought it was over Travis Scot made his own. Travis Scott overcame our monopoly with railroads from Vanderbilt, then just made his own.

    Read More

  • Big Businesses During The Gilded Age

    1434 Words  | 6 Pages

    Competition is good for consumers. For example, if a company has to compete with another company, they will be forced to try to create a better and cheaper product than the other. If a company is a trust, and doesn’t have to compete, they will have no reason to keep their prices low, or improve the quality of their merchandise. This is because a consumer that needs a product will be forced to buy it from the monopoly even if they aren’t happy with the value or cost of it because they have no other choice. Big corporation leaders wanted to eliminate competition.

    Read More

  • Monopolies During The Progressive Era

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Progressive Era, many reforms were made in the attempt to fix the negative facets of America (Fagnilli 27). Progressives were reformers who supported ideas that attempted to make a change in society’s problems, such as corruption of government, women’s suffrage, and accessibility of education (The Progressive Era). These reformers lived mostly in urban areas, and therefore witnessed these issues first-hand, thus they believed that country could be mended by the government if it took responsibility for ensuring safe work conditions and environment, and education (The Progressive Era). Crucial to change in America, issues that were targeted by reforms had both positive and negative impacts, which indisputably changed America.

    Read More

  • Monopolies In The Gilded Age

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Gilded Age By the late 1800s, he United States economy had finally become industrialized and was soon to become monopolized. Railroads were becoming the most important factor of American economy, and local businesses were being put out of work. This time period was commonly known as “The Gilded Age”.

    Read More

  • Synthesis Essay On Harrison Bergeron

    463 Words  | 2 Pages

    Without competition the pride in humans would deprive and the education wouldn 't be the same. The education system would require everyone to have the same knowledge. With that, if everyone one were to think and act the same, the progression of the community would come to a halt. There would be no new discovery or improvement in medicine, science, literature, etc. Without the urge to innovate or discover, a person can 't motivate themselves to achieve new thing because they know they 're not allowed.

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing

    481 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients would be a money saving action if more of the recipient population actually used drugs. Drug testing can make recipients turn away from drugs to get approve for assistance, but it can also have harming effects. Drug testing could have recipients turn away from assistance, punish children for their parent’s actions, and can lose money. Welfare is the financial help for families in need of finances.

    Read More

  • Monopolies In The United States: The Gilded Age

    1971 Words  | 8 Pages

    The period from 1865 to 1900 was characterized by an astronomical boom in industry and manufacturing, economic growth for the rich, financial turmoil for the poor, and political corruption. As a result, the era has been named “The Gilded Age.” Just as something gilded is gold on the outside but worthless metal on the inside, these years seemed prosperous from an outside perspective, when in reality, the wealth gap was increasing at an alarming rate and big business had power over government officials. As a result of this, a lot of federal legislation was influenced by monopolies and often catered to the desires of businessmen. Since regulation of certain business practices would cause these trusts to lose money, Congress shied away from regulating

    Read More

  • Robber Barons Dbq Essay

    1195 Words  | 5 Pages

    Some of the ways Monopolies because monopolies were through both horizontal and vertical integration, These two processes were the foundation of Industrial businesses like the Standard oil company led by Rockefeller and Carnegie steel, it allowed these power houses to control the amount of competition they had and how much it cost. These companies would have the reduced processing price because they set the price then sold it at a cheaper price, putting other businesses in shambles, An example of this is in (Doc H). This apparent genius of a process made it so people could only buy their product from them, it did allow for them to fix prices for items like food, fuel.(Doc A) this did allow for a sort of comfortable lifestyle that was defined as American consumerism. Through corporations like sears in the 1870s people were able to buy luxuries through this new affordable lifestyle. (Doc I).

    Read More

  • Monopolies During The Progressive Era

    408 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the Progressive Era there were multiple of changes occurring that people became overwhelmed. New resources in the oil market, industrialization, fights for equality. There were many factory jobs, however, no one to stand up for the workers. So of course people will turn to their government for help, the power house of the country. However, even the government was picky in what they helped with.

    Read More

  • Cooperation Over Competition In Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward

    763 Words  | 4 Pages

    Competition keeps companies striving for the highest quality products for the lowest price because they want to attract customers. However, if people had no choice where to buy their car, it would not matter what a company sold. Additionally, if there was no competition, there would be no way to benchmark your products for quality or technological advancements. Still using the car company example, the car industry would be like it is in Cuba where everyone drives cars from the 70’s, because that is all they

    Read More

  • Factory System During The Industrial Revolution

    596 Words  | 3 Pages

    Business owners compete in a free market to make the best product or service at a price that will attract the most buyers. The successful businesses grow larger and employ more workers, thereby growing the economy. Proponents of the free market believe that this system encourages innovation, high quality goods, and increases the wealth of countries. The government does as little as possible in a free market economic

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Private Monopolies In The United States

    1203 Words  | 5 Pages

    The reasoning stands that regulation of a monopoly obstructs competitiveness, stunting the industry’s growth. It is a competitive market that creates innovative solutions and furthers human progress. Friedman’s main example is the US railway, where the 19th century had great need for the railway system, yet with the emergence of cars and planes, railroads nearly became obsolete. Thus not only do monopolies hinder the freedom of choice they also hinder the industry by depriving it of innovation. Notably, Friedman clarifies that each case of a monopoly needs to be studied independently.

    Read More

  • Apple Business Ethics Case Study

    1848 Words  | 8 Pages

    The oligopoly market is set up in a way so that competitors can survive because each is unique and there are so few competitors that they are virtually indispensable even if some ethics atrocity

    Read More

  • Oligopoly Case Study

    1870 Words  | 8 Pages

    1.0 INTRODUCTION In an economy, there exists different market structures to accommodate different industries and firms. This study will be made to understand in further depth the market power of different market structures, and in particular an example of using case studies of agricultural sector of the French markets to explain how an ideal perfectly competitive market works. This will then be further strengthened with several references linked to the case study. 1.1 Monopoly market

    Read More

More about Economic Welfare: Monopoly Vs. Perfect Competition

Open Document