No matter the religion, background, ethnicity, or race; education opens doors to the future. Education can make everyone equal; therefore, Horace Mann’s idea of education being the “great equalizer” is true and will always be true in our society. Education offers higher earnings, more available jobs, and a feeling of accomplishment.
Because education offers higher earnings, people tend to live better lives. A look in “Education in the U.S.: The Great Equalizer”, a section of the article that discusses the difference between people who have an education, and their social ladder. Authors Mark Mather and Beth Jarosz state, “Education is also a key predictor of health and longevity. People with higher levels of education have higher earnings; live in better neighborhoods; and can afford to buy better medical care, health insurance, and healthier foods.” (p.4). People with more knowledge are most likely going to earn a good salary, so they can support themselves and their families. Medical care and health insurance are very expensive and people need health insurance in the case of emergencies. Religion and race have absolutely
…show more content…
Graduates will turn out successful and powerful. Having a college education is a proud accomplishment, because of all the hard work, sweat, and tears have paid off at the end. Marcus Mabry shares his thoughts in his article “Living in Two Worlds.” He shares his personal experience as a college student living at Stanford University and visiting his poor family every once in a while. In this reading, Marcus Mabry addresses, “It inspires within me a sense of tenacity and accomplishment that I hope every college graduate will someday possess.”: (p.2). Graduating from college proves to people that they worked hard to obtain those high grades for a bright future. Some people want to be successful in life and want to be able to show that they do not give up
Massachusetts reformer Horace Mann led the charge for the country's first statewide public school. Mann wrote that education “is the great equalizer of the conditions of men—the balance-wheel of the social machinery.” He also said that universal education would allow the United States to maintain a democracy of all Americans, he thought, “must, if citizens of a Republic, understand something of the true nature and functions of the government under which they live.” The public school system became a reality and they were free too. Most young citizens can now go to school poverty free.
Bill Gate, a co-founder of Microsoft, used to say, “Life is not fair. Get used to it.” He thinks people are unique and grow up in different environment, so some will have more advantage than other, but based on “From Report of the Massachusetts Board of Education, 1848,” Horace Mann, a Massachusetts legislature in 1827, had different view point as he believed everyone is equal. Mann was born in poverty, but through the hard working, he contributed incredible ideals to education; however, his myth might be not right in the future as his perception was come from his experience and study in nineteenth century, which is not suit with today society. For example, the wealth distribution of his time was different, and his education system was also
In his article, “Are Too Many People Going to College?” Charles Murray argues that too many people are going to college universities when they should be focusing on other lifestyle options. In his opinion, whether or not to attend college is a personal decision that should be thoroughly thought through. When weighed with the unrealistic prerequisites, the financial expenses, and the time needed to obtain a degree, many people will find that attending college will not be beneficial to them. Speaking of this Murray attests, “The question here is not whether the traditional four-year residential college is fun or valuable as a place to grow up, but when it makes sense as a place to learn how to make a living.
Horace Mann started the movement for education to be more public, rather than having a limited amount of people getting an education because they didn’t have enough money or the right skin color or were born the other
Henry Bienen, president emeritus of Northwestern University disagrees with the premise that too many kids go to college. To support his opinion, he says that we should not use the anecdotal records of those select few like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, no matter how compelling, to generalize about the population as a whole. He professes that the argument about too many people going to college was made in the 70’s and was wrong then, and it is still wrong. He asserts that we now have lots more information and studies to support why it is wrong.
As a college student who is currently spending thousands of dollars to further my education and achieve a career goal, it was, at first, disheartening to read Caroline Bird ’s essay “College is a Waste of Time and Money”. However, after thoroughly examining her points, I now see that her essay is illogical. In her piece “College is a Waste of Time and Money”, Caroline Bird argues against the idea that “college is the best place for all high-school graduates” (1); in other words, college isn’t for everyone. Throughout her writing, Bird supplies her readers with evidence that explains how, for some individuals, college is a waste of not only time and money, but of intellectual effort, as well.
First off, Mann talks about Physical Education in “the common school”. Mann believed that health and strength were indispensable ingredients to a good education. Horace Mann compares health to money in this section. Therefore, it is civic duty to stay healthy, he claims health is within our own control. Each child must advocate for himself so schools should spread the info of health: to popularize it.
In his 12th annual report directed at poor/working class, Mann states that: children are treasures; education will prevent class hardening, which occurs in Europe; education is a great equalizer – American dream means future mobility. Mann created the county educational conventions
“3 Reasons College Still Matters” by Andrew Delbanco 3) “Surely, every American college ought to defend this waning possibility, whatever we call it. And an American college is only true to itself when it opens its doors to all - the rich, the middle, and the poor - who have the capacity to embrace the precious chance to think and reflect before life engulfs them. If we are all serious about democracy, that means everyone.” 4) In this part of the writing Andrew Delbanco tries to persuade his audience by using the pattern of logic that agrees with the overall argument but also considers another striking point of view to strengthen the argument (While these arguments are convincing, they must also consider…).
Throughout the essay, Charles Murray stresses the idea that college is the wonderland of finding oneself and to find the career that one would want to follow for the rest of their lives. “College is seen as the open sesame to a good job and a desirable way for adolescents to transition to adulthood. Neither reason is as persuasive as it first appears.” Murray, C (2008) Practically spoken, this is not normally the case. College is a fair amount of work, much more work than one would normally acquire through any course of a high school or secondary school setting.
To begin with, going to college can help people gain greater wealth. In the article, “Five Ways Ed Pays,” its stated that “you can earn up to 22,000 more per year” (“Five Ways Ed Pays”). High school graduates will have a much harder time finding high paying jobs without a
“Automatic health insurance” (“Five Ways Ed Pays”). If you go to college you are more likely to get health insurance from being employed by a secure job. With health insurance you can receive physicals and medicines when needed. “People who graduated from college has a lower rate than people who don 't go to college” (“College Degree, Better Health”) . People who don’t go to college doesn’t automatically receive health insurance and that 's a lower rate rather than people who attend college and receive coverage.
Money may make some of these people more ignorant, and even do something harmful to the society. The rich of one man is a trifle, and the wealth of a group of people is a blessing. One's lack of education will not hurt the important essentials while a group of people lack education is the misfortune of
There is a third reason which is the Most important reason, is to get a great picture of the cultural diversity of the United States of America. Knowledge of others, their cultures, their sciences and way of life, is useful for learning about a new culture. Some cultures have good qualities and bad recipes, or perhaps do not fit the nature of our lives. For example, my presence in America has made me learn a lot of American cultures that if I find them in my country and may be useful to me or in raising my children such as opening the door to the person walks behind me, honestly I like this behavior which I miss this in my country. In general, the idea of quoting the culture that suits our societies may help us to develop from the reality of our lives.
In this way inequality becomes justified. However Bowles and Gintis argue that rewards in education and occupation are based not on ability but on social background. The higher a person’s class or origin the more likely they are to attain top qualifications and a top job. See Bourdon (position theory); Bourdiau (cultural capital); and Bernstein (language and class). For Bowles and Ginitis then, school can be seen to legitimize social inequality.