Mao ruled for over twenty-seven years and during that time, “he had doomed China’s people to become some of the poorest on the planet”. In 1976 Mao died and Deng Xiaoping took over as China’s leader. Like Mao, Deng focused first on the countryside and gave out land to farmers and paid the farmers how much they grew a year this lead to farmers being able to pick which crops they wanted to farm and Deng have the farmers to pay taxes instead of handing over a third of their crops. Since the majority of China’s population was farmers this gave a boost to their economic standing and an opportunity for a better
This relates to today’s society except instead of the transcontinental railroad, we have smart phones, computers, cars, etc. We are rushing our lives by always making things easier with out smart phones. 7. The purpose of the parable in paragraph five is to reach a greater audience. In the time that Thoreau’s book was written, many Chinese were immigrating to the United States to build the Transcontinental Railroad.
While universities have greatly expanded their populations to include a wider group of students, at the end of the day, they are still the most selective form of post-secondary education. And with many schools, the selection process is not always an accurate judge of character for all students. As a result of this, many students feel abandoned by the very idea of attending a university. Selectivity is not the only deterrent either. In the past few decade, the cost of attending a university has skyrocketed.
And with the help of subsidies, from state governments that go to the school, they can boost the pay of college graduates with a four year degree and even those who don’t have a degree at all (Rampell, Catherine.). But in recent years the subsidies haven’t been catching up with the cost of living in America which forces the colleges back to having the students pay most everything they do on campus (Rampell, Catherine.). Moreover for the poor of America who can’t afford to go half ends up still poorly. Giving the stone cold truth college is not a choice anymore. That if people want to move up the ladder to a decent paying job where they can support themselves and their family college is the only true means of doing
“Obama proposes to spend a record $12 billion over the next decade to strengthen the nation’s system of 1,200 community colleges, part of a larger goal to restore the United States as the leader in college graduates by 2020.” (CQ Researcher). With rapid technology advances, many of today 's jobs are increasingly defined by the ability to think critically, operate a computer, and work collaboratively in a team environment. Today’s college education develops these skills, providing individuals with invaluable personal business skills, and knowledge, as well as opening the door to better career opportunities, and increasing earning power. By providing free higher education students can attend a college or university of their choice and be able to achieve a higher education to better their future. Free primary and secondary education is good for our economy, strengthens our democracy and, most importantly, is fundamental to the health and future of our children.
An article written by Sean Coughlan states that, “Pupils in England already get an average of 150 hours extra teaching per year than their Finnish counterparts.” Students in Finland do not receive homework, but their test scores are ranked sixth in the world. This goes to prove that all the extra homework US students receive is not beneficial. Finland students also spend less time in school than US students do. This goes to conclude that extra homework does not equal better test
This can improve their employment potential as more jobs continue to require postsecondary education. A research report from Georgetown University said “By 2020, 65 percent of all jobs in the economy will require postsecondary education and training beyond high school (citation).” Even the relatively low cost of community college can discourage potential students who are devoid of time and money. Unfortunately, many prospective students cannot receive financial aid despite being too poor to attend
A disturbing amount of students do not graduate college. Prospecting students may feel college is the only option, but studies show that “nearly two million students who enter college every year, close to forty-five percent will not graduate even in six years, largely because of low classroom attendance”(Reynolds 1). Students throw thousands of dollars out the window on college because students are not even bothered to show up to class. In addition, student money and government funds are simply being wasted on students who aren’t even willing to attend classes which leads to students not graduating with anything but debt. In addition, numerable students end up leaving college because classwork is too difficult and stressful.
Giving more examples here, when I work as a teacher doe a language training institute in China, every year a great many of young Chinese students pay for courses and improve their English language skills in order to study in the United States for better education opportunity. They usually maintain the idea that compared with Chinese educational system which emphasizes results of examinations generating high pressure on
Is there even a need to send these children for extra classes? In a survey conducted by The Straits Times and research firm Nexus Link in 2015, seven in 10 families in Singapore pack their pre-school children off to tuition. The most common reason for private tuition - cited by more than half of the parents with children under seven - was to keep up with others. It is my opinion that the increasing prevalence of private tuition nowadays is superfluous. Our education system is top-notch.
In today’s worldwide economy, there is a high demand for the best-educated post-graduate students in our industry. Hundreds of thousands of intellectually savvy students cannot afford to go to college, and those that can leave school with a colossal debt that haunts them for years after. As stated by presidential candidate Sanders, “That shortsighted path to the future must end. I will fight to make sure that every American who studies hard in school can go to college regardless of how much money their parents make and without going deeply into debt. This isn’t a radical idea.” We see worldwide that this burden of debt has hindered society for too long.
In my opinion, there are several valid reasons for this difference and it takes several years of dedication and everyone’s enormous effort to get rid of these differences. First of all, the division of states in the underdeveloped countries based on the caste, religion, and political system is why these countries lag behind. Should there be a centralized government just as in the industrialized nations, there would be more development and progress. Secondly, education is not standardized in the underdeveloped nations and schools admit students based on their level of wealth. The government provides schooling until high school in some of the underdeveloped nations, but the educational standard is way lower than the school the children from richer families attend.
This represents only 38 percent of the cost of the average tuition at a four-year public university ($6,185)… Financial aid poticies at the institutional, state and federal level have failed to acknowledge the need to support transfer students and increase the participation rates for students from lower-income families…” This exemplifies, student and their families are at higher risk of deriving loan and repaying them off, especially lower- income families. In Contrast, The Morrill Act of 1862, which was helpful and reassure that education would be available to people of all social classes. It gave higher education in America, by setting up institutions, which would educate people in professions that were practice at that time. As a result, The Morrill Act changed the look of education and space for growing and changing country and ensured that there would always be money to finance educational services and that it would have continual government support of these institutions. Also, in “The Financial Needs of Community College Students” she notes, “...As college degrees become more and more necessary for success in the work force, it is crucial that we find solutions to this financial aid situation.
Lachachiaa bring up is that half of them can’t find a job in their field when they graduate. So not only are they now working in a field irrelevant to their field of study, but they are thousand of dollars in student loans. He argues that certain people (hyper) need to get out and work, yet society pushes them and trys to mold them into beign soething that they are not. Mr. Lachamiaa believes that these people would be happier working with their hands and releaseing some of that hyperactivity. Mr. Lachamiaa says he is very greatful for those college educated, engneeirs, doctors, architects and lawyers.
This makes it harder for students to afford college at all. With the increase in college tuition skyrocketing it has made college less accessible to many. Many students looking for a post secondary education are no longer able to save enough money for school. According to the College Board, the cost of college at a public four year school today is approximately $9,139 per year. In 1971, the cost at the same public four year school was only $428 per year.