ipl-logo

Edward Snowden: Hero Or Traitor?

992 Words4 Pages

Treasonous Valor

Edward Snowden believed he was doing the right thing when he illegally released classified documents. He saw the government’s wrongdoings and thought the public should know that their fourth amendment was being violated. While Snowden believed his intentions were justifiable, his actions created one of our countries’ most controversial issues. He made known of illegal activities by turning around and doing something illegal himself. Two wrongs do not make a right. [THESIS] Edward Snowden is a traitor to the United States of America and should be prosecuted. [THESIS]

The main issue in the case is that Snowden leaked classified surveillance data. The surveillance data revealed that the government was spying on the public by …show more content…

The issue at hand was supposed to be about our civil liberties being violated, but Snowden inadvertently put the spotlight on himself by breaking the law as well. Thus, bringing up our topic of him being a hero or a traitor rather than just the government breaking civil laws. While the topic of Snowden is a valid issue, it is not exactly the one that should be receiving the most attention by the media. Instead of focusing on who did what, we should be focusing on the public’s rights and safety. The argument against Snowden also brings up the false dilemma fallacy. Edward Snowden is either a hero who should be pardoned for his crimes or he is a traitor who should be punished. It is either one or the other. Why can he not be a hero that is prosecuted as well? A perfect example of this would be Nelson Mandela. He was arrested and imprisoned for 27 years for standing against his government because he believed what they were doing was wrong. Mandela is a prime example of a …show more content…

What he did was for a good cause, but it was still wrong. Geoffrey Stone affirmed, “There is a federal statute that makes it a crime for public employees who have been granted access to classified information to reveal that information to persons who are unauthorized to receive it” (Democracy Now). Edward Snowden did exactly that by handing over the classified documents to several journalists. As I mentioned earlier, he had good intentions, but breaking the law for whatever reason is still breaking the law. Stone also stated, “Whether one admires what he did is another question, but it doesn’t have anything to do with whether or not what he did was unlawful” (Democracy

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Was Wilson Right In Passing The Pilgrimage And Sedition Acts

    1013 Words  | 5 Pages

    Without the Espionage and Sedition Acts, the United States’s national security might have been threatened, and the United States might have never won the war.

    Read More

  • Is Benedict Arnold A Hero Or A Traitor

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    Do you think Benedict Arnold is a hero or a traitor?Benedict Arnold is both hero and traitor. He betrayed the patriots to join the british. He was a hero because he helped the patriots win one of the battles. The patriots were happy with him because he helped them. Then he betrayed the patriots to join the british and so the patriots got mad at him.

    Read More

  • Was Benedict Arnold A Hero Or A Traitor

    1183 Words  | 5 Pages

    Imagine a young boy ambitious not to let down his family, like his father did, but to be a hero. A boy determined to not make the same mistakes as his father. Now imagine this boy as a man not only letting down his family, but the entire country of America. This man was Benedict Arnold, who was an American General and who became a traitor during the American revolution. Two marriages, a need for money, and a sad childhood weighed down Benedict causing him to make possibly the worst decision of his life, turning to the British side during the war.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Patriot Act provides the United States’ law enforcement agencies broad power in both domestic and international surveillance. This act was designed due to the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. President Bush requested this act to the United States Congress which they passed on October 26, 2001. The act was put in place quickly to stop terrorist within the United States border and be able to apprehend and prosecute the terrorist before they are able to act ("Patriot Act."). The Patriot Act was established to prevent terrorist attacks however; the Patriot Act violates the Constitution making the Act illegal.

    Read More

  • Snowden's Response To Thomas Jefferson

    790 Words  | 4 Pages

    The case against Edward Snowden is strong. He acted with recklessness and possible self-serving convenience; even so, by shedding light on the invasive government actions taken to deal with terrorism, Snowden did his country a service, demanding accountability from a branch of the government that has been given free reign because of our post-9/11 fears. Still the fear persists that a society that accepts challenges to laws also insights anarchy (Leibman). This argument quickly falls flat: civil disobedience is action taken to fulfill a worthy higher principle, not just a means to benefit oneself. The intricacies of this were exposed when the acting Attorney General refused to allow the Justice Department to defend President Trump’s travel ban until its constitutionality could be affirmed.

    Read More

  • Watergate Throat Analysis

    2406 Words  | 10 Pages

    The Article kept true to the facts but Mark Felt was a hero, a patriot an original Edward Snowden who did the right thing even against something that was bigger than

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Edward Snowden

    1418 Words  | 6 Pages

    Edward Snowden sparked huge sensational news stories and debates over the groundbreaking revelation of the massive surveillance program that was authorized by Congress and the president of the United States of America. It was formally presented as the USA PATRIOT Act by Congress and signed into law by George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The PATRIOT Act was approved by a large bipartisan majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives. The PATRIOT Act soon went under the radar as the US went into war in Afghanistan and Iraq. However, Edward Snowden forced up the issue of civil liberties and national security once again when he released documents specifically pertaining to the National Security Agency out to The Guardian.

    Read More

  • Charles Schenck's Arguments Against The Espionage Act

    529 Words  | 3 Pages

    Oliver Wendell Holmes once wrote, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsly shouting in a theatre and causing panic.” Similarly, the Supreme Court’s ruling to arrest Schenck was wrong, and a U.S. citizen should be allowed to protest a war or draft in times of war. Specifically, the Espionage Act violated the first Amendment, Charles Schenck, whom was arrested after violating the Act, was indicting no violence, and the Act violated the 13th Amendment. First, citizens in the U.S. being allowed to protest wars or drafts specifically shines through since the Espionage Act violates the 13th Amendment.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience Dbq Essay

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    For example, Edward Snowden exposed the National Security Agency for eavesdropping on Americans and people around the world, despite the possibility of being arrested and charged with heavy crimes. " So, what did the leaks tell us? First, they confirmed that the U.S. government, without obtaining any court warrants, routinely collects the phone logs of tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of Americans, who have no links to terrorism whatsoever,"(Source 3). The question is who is truly at fault? The government for doing that or Snowden for ratting them out to the public about

    Read More

  • The History Of Ariel Castro Kidnapping Trial

    550 Words  | 3 Pages

    By now, everyone in America has heard the name Ariel Castro. Castro is known for holding three adolescents captive in his Cleveland home for over a decade. Media coverage in the Cleveland area exploded, and a nation was invested in finding these three captives alive (Berry et al. 74-75). In the eyes of the law, justice was initially served in the Ariel Castro kidnapping trial because he was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole (Glatt 316).

    Read More

  • Letters From A Birmingham Jail By Martin Luther King Jr.

    781 Words  | 4 Pages

    With Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, this issue was brought into relief. Was he full of moral superiority over a gray issue, or was he "that most awkward and infuriating of creatures-- a man of conscience," as John Cassidy wrote in his article "Why Edward Snowden is a Hero." Because, while Jeffrey Toobin wrote in "Edward Snowden is No Hero" that Snowden's leak was cemented in grandiose narcissism over an issue American citizens should have already digested, wasn't it after his leak that there arose an uproar over the NSA activities, which inevitably placed a modicum of agency back in the hands of the American people? I still wonder whether my perspective would be the same had Snowden released files which did more lasting harm to national security. But in that case, would that activism now be violent, instead of

    Read More

  • Letter From Birmingham Jail

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    Snowden took it upon himself peacefully resist the law

    Read More

  • The Espionage And Sedition Act

    376 Words  | 2 Pages

    The personal liberties of Americans is what gives meaning to being an American. These liberties should be respected and upheld to the greatest efforts possible and should not be abridged by no means less than do process as exemplified by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the American Constitution. However, over time, we have learned about legislation that has been enacted by our government with said efforts to protect the nation. Hence, the Espionage and Sedition Acts, the confinement of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War, the Red Scare post-WWII, and the Pentagon Papers of 1971 are all examples that depict some of the behaviors performed by the federal government that would appear to infringe on these liberties.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

    615 Words  | 3 Pages

    On September 11, 2001 terrorists attacked our country. Immediately after these attacks our US congress had to do something. They passed two major pieces of legislature. The first being authorization for use of military force, which gave George W Bush permission to use military force against terrorists, which he used to wage a full war. The second legislature was Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the patriot act, which allowed government to use loopholes in the fourth amendment to keep surveillance on their citizens to stop terrorism.

    Read More

  • Edward Snowden Ethical Issues

    1471 Words  | 6 Pages

    The main issue in the Snowden controversy is the conflicting rights of private individuals and the US government with regard to the use of telecommunications and the internet. There are ethical issues surrounding this controversy and the most applicable ethical approach for this case is “Ethics by Rights Approach”. As a background, the reason why US government had declared Edward Snowden a traitor is his involvement in the leaking of about 1.7 million confidential US documents, 15,000 Australian intelligence files and 58,000 British intelligence files from the National Security Agency (or NSA) to the public. These confidential information were acquired by the NSA through the PRISM program by collaborating with big internet companies such

    Read More

More about Edward Snowden: Hero Or Traitor?

Open Document