Effects Of Communism In Russia

1024 Words5 Pages
Communism in Russia
Communism in Russia has a negative impact on its citizens. There are mixed opinions about communism in Russia. For example, in communist Russia they have a powerful economy. If Russia was how Marx envisioned, it would be exceptional but now it’s corrupt. Because of several major factors, Russia should not be a communist country. Many people don’t know that communism in Russia has a vast and rugged history. To start, the original vision for it is called Marxism and was created by Karl Marx in the early twentieth century. According to Britannica, Marx had originally desired for Russia to be a democracy so the people could vote on their leader or have a referendum. Marx had also thought out communism for many years and
…show more content…
According to “The Differences Between Communism and Capitalism” the industry is really efficient. To put into context, Russia’s industry is publically owned and operated. This means that the industry can’t operate without the common folk. To add, Russia has shared resources, this makes it so resources are distributed evenly and aren’t kept by a single person. Secondly, the working conditions are on the better side. For example, people have equal wages so they don’t get jealous or feel like they are making less than they should. In addition, they have trade unions to stick up for them. Lastly there is a vision of no classes which means no rich or poor people. For instance, the middle class or bourgeoisie runs the country because without them the industry or farms wouldn’t function. Hence, there are no wealthy people hoarding currency which means more money goes to the people. You could bander that there isn’t any motive to work because they can’t climb the ladder of wealth. Russia is supposed to work as one like a hivemind or stick together in terms of economy. To conclude, Russia does have a bright side to…show more content…
According to “The Differences Between Communism and Capitalism” the industry is really efficient. To put into context, Russia’s industry is publically owned and operated. This means that the industry can’t operate without the common folk. To add, Russia has shared resources, this makes it so resources are distributed evenly and aren’t kept by a single person. Secondly, the working conditions are on the better side. For example, people have equal wages so they don’t get jealous or feel like they are making less than they should. In addition, they have trade unions to stick up for them. Lastly there is a vision of no classes which means no rich or poor people. For instance, the middle class or bourgeoisie runs the country because without them the industry or farms wouldn’t function. Hence, there are no wealthy people hoarding currency which means more money goes to the people. You could bander that there isn’t any motive to work because they can’t climb the ladder of wealth. Russia is supposed to work as one like a hivemind or stick together in terms of economy. To conclude, Russia does have a bright side to
Open Document