Keywords:
*Civil Society *Democracy
*Democratization *Political corruption
*People’s power *Globalization
Introduction
Between the years 1974 and 1990, more than 30 countries in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe, and East Asia made the transition from authoritarian to democratic regimes. Huntington (1991) divides this process of global democratic expansion into waves and, according to him, this current phase of democratization process is called the third wave. The first wave of democratization began in the 1820’s with the widening male suffrage in the United States, and continued until 1926, giving rise to some 29 democracies. Nevertheless, in 1922, the first “reverse wave” came with Mussolini’s rise to power in Italy,
…show more content…
The idea that civil society can contribute to the development of democracy was presented by twentieth-century political scientists, Almond and Verba (1963), who argued that voluntary associations were the most important mediating element between individuals and the state. These voluntary associations facilitates better consciousness and informed citizenry, who make better voting decisions, participate in politics, and make the government more responsible as a result. Besides having an important impact on the cultivation of better citizens, civil society presents itself as a control of political authority. Associative interest groups continuously monitor state activities and, as a result, hold leaders of authority accountable through popular scrutiny. In addition, the existence of dense networks of associative interest groups stimulates political participation by providing multiple channels for citizens to express opinions, attitudes, and articulate the interests of citizens. This gives people a reason to get involved …show more content…
(2016). Civil Society and Democratic Consolidation. In In Search of Democracy (pp. 118-131). New York, NY: Routledge.
Diamond, L, & Plattner, M. F. (Eds.). (1990). Democracy’s Third Wave. In The Global Resurgence of Democracy (pp. 3-25). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Doorenspleet, R. (2005). Introduction. In Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave (pp. 1-12). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Grugel, J. (2002). The Meaning of Democratization. In Democratization: A Critical Introduction (pp. 1-9). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). What? In The Third Wave: Democratization in the late Twentieth Century (pp. 3-30). University of Oklahoma Press.
Ishiyama, J. T. (2012). Social Structure and Politics. In Comparative Politics: Principles of Democracy and Democratization (pp. 118-133). United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Welzel, C. (2009). Theories of Democratization. In A. Haerpfer, C. W., Bernhagen, P., Inglehart, R. F., & Welzel, C. (Eds.). Democratization. (pp. 74 – 90). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
World Economic Forum (WEF, 2013). The Future Role of Civil Society. Retrieved from
1. Why did the framers of the Constitution adopt separation of powers with checks and balances? Give some examples of checks and balances found in the Constitution. The framers of the Constitution wanted to ensure that no one individual branch of government had more power than another.
During the time when reform movements were common (1825-1850), people stated the following statement. “Reform movements in the United States sought to expand democratic ideals.” The only question that remains from this statement is if this statement still holds up to its claim. The answer to this question is a definite yes where reform movements did sought to expand democratic ideals. These ideals can range from the common good to egalitarianism and justice.
Problems in America only grew worse when democracy was being added to the mixture of already complicated politics. In Woody Holton’s book, Unruly American and the Origins of the Constitution, he stated that, “many Americans. . . were growing ‘tired of an excess of democracy,’ a ‘prevailing rage of excessive democracy. . .’ [or] ‘democratical tyranny.’” Democracy was an attempt at home rule among the colonies, but not everyone was happy with this extreme excess of colonial citizens contribution to the government.
In the article, “The Glory of Democracy” (2017), by David Brooks, he implies that our Democraacy is declining, the degration of democracies in our country, and how good our system is. He supports his claim by providing evidence from a novel called “The coming victory of Democracy,” by Thomas Manns. Brooks uses an informative tone to inform how Democracy is a great form of government to persuade people to not take advantage of our system. In the begining of this article Brooks start off discussing about how when the Berlin wall fell Democracies started to rise.
In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville provides an analysis and critique of American civic life. During his travels across the country, he discovered how different America was from Europe, particularly France. While the majority of Europe consisted of aristocratic countries with hundreds of years of history, America was a young democratic country. Most notably, he observed that America was growing in equality. The growing equality becomes a presupposition of individualism and isolation, but despite this inevitable growth of equality, individualism and isolation can be minimized.
Government driven policies set public disengagement by only putting issues on the table that an elite group can participate in. The voted become less and less meaningless each election. Non-participation is described by Schattschneider as an untapped goldmine. The
In addition, regardless of the turmoil felt in the beginning of democratic revolutions, democracies lend way to more peaceful periods for their is a defined succession of power that is difficult to challenge. From the U.S. inauguration of 1801, this country is a paragon of something “fundamental to any healthy democracy: a peaceful transition of power”(Laskowski). Additionally, in the analysis of the economic benefits, “the top 25 richest countries in the world (as ranked by the World Bank) are also fully established democracies,” often due to free-market system of capitalism where companies and individuals can trade without government
America and the Elite Class In an attempt to better classify and understand state’s power particularly in the United States of America as well as other democratic nations, pluralism and the elite class have much to proffer. While democracy is the most common model for most governments including America, the reality is that there are other structural powers in play beyond democracy. Accordingly, there are at least a few rivaling theories that explain further the power structure in the U.S. namely: the pluralism, electoral democracy, economically elite dominant and biased pluralism. As of this paper, the main agenda is to argue out that the elite class has and assumes more power and control in contrast to pluralism, democracy and the rest.
citizens to remodel the laws and correct the issues neglected by the U.S. government. This theme can act as a lesson for U.S. citizens in that action is needed from them, for a controversial change to occur. However, considering more recent events, it might have become clear that citizens of the U.S. have not quite learned from the embarrassments of their country’s past; as it seems that there are some improvements that within the U.S. government. The improvements needed for a better U.S. democracy include a way to individualize and localize the voting system, as well as clean up political campaigns and try to destroy corruption within the U.S. government
Democracy is a system of government in which the power to govern is vested on the citizens. This power is exercised either directly wherein citizens reach a consensus to implement policies, or indirectly through the election of representatives who will act on behalf of the citizen's interest (Janda, Berry, Goldman, and Hula, 2012). In such states that have adapted democratic government, political participation is the hallmark of citizens' right and ability to exercise their power. The definition of political participation, as with all concepts of social sciences, is subject to debate since most social science concepts are subject to the changing norms of society and government. Thus, this paper defines political participation as a social phenomenon that takes on different forms which is used by citizens to influence government policies and politics.
If people have no place to voice their will or take part in deciding their own destiny, the community might grow disinterested and passive in their relationship with their government. Mill believes this is problematic for society because history, as he sees it, has shown that more democratic societies have more ‘energetic, and ‘developed’ societies as well as more ‘go ahead characters’ not seen in more totalitarian societies. Yet, this criticism might fail to cover a deeper problem of disinterest; it might lead to a level of moral deficiency as well. Mill fears that a loss of ability and activity, leads to a society losing its sense of communal responsibility and social justice. In their aloofness, people might be less inclined to believe that they have any responsibility to society since society has ceased to have any rights or purpose under absolute authority.
In Thailand for example, the discourse that the election system is no more reliable because of populist activities performing by the corrupted government agencies in order to “buy vote” from the poor and uneducated majority is apparent. People seem to lost faith in democracy due to the belief that it is an instrument of immorality. However, the belief is untruthful. Democracy takes the significant part in reducing corruption with only that the process is not happen naturally. In this essay, the argument f
“Democracy is beautiful in theory; in practice it is a fallacy,” said Benito Mussolini. By the time one enters the third grade they become aware of concept of democracy. Specifically in America, one is taught that they live in a democratic society. When asking what is democracy, the answer is never truly defiente. The answers given may be; a society where everyone votes, or by dictionary definition “a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of the state; typically through elected representation.”
First of all, it is important to know the definition of democracy and its aspects. According to Peter Joyce (2005), the democratic government was initiated in the Greek city state of Athens in the fifth century B.C., so as a consequence, the word ‘democracy’ derived from two Greek words, demos (meaning ‘people’) and kratos (meaning ‘power’) , which means ‘government by the people’. Secondly, Giovanni Sartori (1997), a Political Science Researcher states that ‘democracy’ is an abbreviation that means Liberal Democracy. He distinguishes three aspects: democracy as a principle of legitimacy (power not derives
The political party model then spread over many parts of Western Europe, including France and Germany, over the 19th century. Since then, they have become the most common political system in the world. In this essay, we will show how political parties are essential to ensuring democracy. We will also show that there are unavoidable negative consequences to the party system. One of the fundamental tenants of democracy is the