Globalization In The Middle East Essay

1867 Words8 Pages

The Middle East has a wide history of external intervention in its social, political, and economic affairs. Of these, the most damaging effects are not those that were made at the time of physical intervention, but rather the legacies of political and economic instability, as well as a struggle identity in the wake of colonization. The foreign penetration of the Middle East and North Africa was done by variety of Western actors in their search for economic gain and strategic influence over the region. Because these outside actors were too preoccupied with internal competition amongst other Wester nations, as well as with keeping their exploitative agendas in mind, they rarely bothered to establish responsible local government, social, or …show more content…

About these, it can be said that monarchies are such because the societies in which they persist were not subjected to colonial influence as intense and protracted as those that became oratorial states and republics, where the lower strata were mobilized and ultimately removed monarchs (Moore Henry, Springborg). As such the ‘monarchical polities and economies’ as a whole tend to be more responsive to the challenges and opportunities of globalization.(ibid) However, just as praetorian states maintain the reconstructed oligarchy which can lead to widespread state corruption, the prerogatives of royal power can limit the aforementioned capacities as the monarchy is intent on maintaining its power. Examples of monarchies in which political and economic power tent to be dispersed and political competition relatively institutionalized; their power is generally legitimized. Other gulf monarchies such as Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates; power is more concentrated amongst the ruling families, and political compensation is less open and structured, and is therefore considerably less legitimate.

Open Document