Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment
The official definition of an experiment is a scientific procedure undertaken to make a discovery, test a hypothesis, or demonstrate a known fact. While the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to be a psychological experiment, which took place in a mock prison, however, it fell extremely short of being a tangible scientific experiment. There was no control group, no substantial hypothesis, and fell short of demonstrating any facts; the experiment took place simply because Dr. Zimbardo got an idea based on the Holocaust. Although the Stanford Prison Experiment was intended to be an experiment, it became similar to a simulation due to the experiment's constituents, higher powers pushing constituents to act a certain way, and the head experimenter. …show more content…
Zimbardo took part in the experiment as the prison supervisor. If this were a truly thought-through experiment, he would have had no part in the experiment rather than simply reviewing and analyzing the results. Rather, he overlooked many issues within the makeshift prison, such as disputes, and encouraged them to perform as he wanted. In “The Real Lesson of the Stanford Prison Experiment”, it was stated that Zimbardo’s interpretation of events was far too shaped by his expectations, he wanted them to turn on each other just because they had new roles with more or less power than they had before. He was searching far too hard for results, which led to the ‘experiment’ failure. While Zimbardo became invoked in the experiment and played his role, he let the neglect take place. He then later realized how wrong the whole experiment was because of an outside person, and only then did he make plans to end the experiment. “By the time Christina intervened, it was the middle of the night, so I had to make plans to terminate the next morning,” (314). He also went on to see the reality of what his experiment had done, and what kind of subject his experiment had created. “When I went back down to the basement, I witnessed the final scene of depravity, the ‘camel humping’ episode. I was so glad that it would be the last such abuse I would see or be responsible for,” (314). This just proved how blinded Zimbardo was by results, which led to such terrible neglect of subjects. If he had realized how result-obsessive he was sooner, maybe the experiment may not have continued this long, or maybe the subjects would have acted
Randy Gragg
1016 Words | 5 Pagesthem binary through the authority implied by the direct guard inmate relationship. In quiet rage, the purpose of the experiment was to show what an increase in power and status can do to a person. Essentially Zimbardo's power and authority (being the phycologist) led him to overlooking horrible situations and allowing them to take place. In fact, his own experiment even tricked him. Look at all the police brutality and all the violence in the prisons.
What Are The Dependent Variables In The Stanford Prison Experiment
946 Words | 4 Pages“Sanitary conditions declined rapidly, exacerbated by the guards' refusal to allow some prisoners to urinate or defecate anywhere but in a bucket placed in their cell” (“Stanford Prison Experiment,” n.d.). The guards utilized various punishments including disallowing the cellmates to empty their sanitation buckets, demanding them to sleep on the concrete, and requiring certain prisoners to be naked. As the experiment continued, several guards became increasingly merciless, and approximately one-third displayed sadistic tendencies (“Stanford prison experiment,” n.d.). The majority of the guards were infuriated after the experiment concluded after only 6 days. Zimbardo mentioned his own immersion in the
Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
689 Words | 3 PagesZimbardo ensured that the experiment was more dramatic than an actual prison. In real prisons, guards were encouraged to not cause any conflict in the prison, but Zimbardo encouraged conflict to start. Hosing down, sexually humiliating, and essentially dissociating the prisoners from themselves are a few examples of the now unethical things that took place. Court cases in which guards were charged with abusing the prisoners and even protests took place after the experiment. Arguably, the most controversial part of the entire experiment was the contract.
The Stanford Jail Experiment Summary
989 Words | 4 PagesLooking at the video, Prisoner #8612 assumed that no one could leave the experiment until it was over. That is a classic example of deception by Zimbardo in the Stanford experiment. Even though he stated in the video that "he believed that we would never let him go, although we never said that," he didn’t reassure the prisoner that he could leave on his own accord. Zimbardo was not truthful with prisoner #8612, assuring him that he can leave the experiment whenever he wishes, and prisoner #8612 convinces the other prisoners that they were in a real prison and that they cannot leave until the experiment is over. That in itself lacks integrity and was
Philip Zimbardo: The Lucifer Effect
1254 Words | 6 PagesSituational effects and personality come into conflict when discussing behavior. Personality is someone’s “usual pattern of behavior, feelings, and thoughts” (Twenge, 2017, p.20). It remains constant throughout different situations, but some situations can be stressful enough to make a person act out of character. The transition between a person’s normal personality and behavior to a more evil, sinister behavior fascinates a man named Philip Zimbardo, who conducted the infamous Zimbardo Prison Experiment, or Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). Zimbardo is an American psychologist at Stanford University and the mastermind behind the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment (The Story).
The Stanford Prison Experiment And The Milgram Obedience Experiment
1379 Words | 6 PagesHe may have been so focused on seeing how the guards treated their prisoners that he totally missed other big findings in the experiment. The participants who were guards also had their experiences impacted by Zimbardo. Since Zimbardo told them how to behave in the study, they felt like they had to comply and do what they were told. This is called demand characteristics, where participants may behave in ways they think are expected of them responding to Subtle or unintentional cues from experimenters(Buvinger, 2023). Because of demand characteristics, the participants did not truly act how they would which deems the results invalid.
Summary Of The Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1575 Words | 7 PagesThe Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment is an infamous study that caught the eye of the world and has been taught about in universities and classrooms. This experiment was conducted in 1971, when psychologists Philip Zimbardo and researchers initially set out to form an experiment that observed the impact of becoming a prison guard and prisoner. The researchers wanted to know how the participant would react when placed in a prison simulation. This simulation was conducted in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building.
Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesIn summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves
Brief Summary Of The Video 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'
364 Words | 2 PagesI watched the Stanford Prison Experiment video. After watching the video, I was amazed at what the participants went through mentally in such a short time. I was shocked by how the prisoners accepted this as a reality, like it was actually prison. I was especially interested in the student that played the role of a prison guard that was nicknamed John Wayne. It seemed very strange to me that he willingly harassed and eventually tortured the participants playing the role of prisoners.
Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesThe guards were instructed to maintain order anyway they wanted without using physical violence. Zimbardo wanted the guards to seem intimidating while the prisoners were made to look inferior and were to be referred to with their ID number only. After the prisoners were assigned their roles and the guards took their post was the effect of the experiment finally setting in. On the morning of the second day the prisoners began to rebel against the guards by ripping off their ID numbers and barring the doors while taunting the guards. This event was the first step down the slippery slope that would follow.
Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesOn day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.
The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men
983 Words | 4 PagesIn the article of “The Perils of Obedience”, written by Stanley Milgram, the experimenter explains that the experiment is to see how far a person could hurt a victim in a situation where he is ordered to do so. Also, in the article “The Stanford Prison
How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesThese series of events seemed to bring out the worst in both prisoners and guards. Prisoners were losing all sense of personal identity after being referred to as numbers and not personal names this made them feel less important and they successfully believed it to be true. After six intense days of Phillip Zimbardo’s conforming to social roles experiment a graduate student who was only there to take notes and interview was so shocked by what she saw she demanded the experiment end straight away as it was degrading to watch and degrading for all who took part as Phillip Zimbardo and his team watched the situation descend into chaos she was only the voice that spoke up about how bad the experiment truly
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesHe is a selfish psychologist who just wanted to get a result. He did not realize that he is starting to act like a prison superintendent than a researcher. He only realizes it when Christina Maslach, objected the experiment after she saw that the prisoners were being harassed by the guards. Even if the study has received a lot of ethical criticism, the result still helps Zimbardo to make a conclusion that is helpful for his future endeavor in research.
What Are The Psychological Effects Of The Stanford Prison Study
392 Words | 2 PagesStill, some participants believed that the experiment was acceptable, but it should not have exceeded the second day as day after day, it became harsher. Consequently, scientists, the public, and the media should have stopped it in a couple of two days to avoid the harm caused by the
More about Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment
Randy Gragg
1016 Words | 5 PagesWhat Are The Dependent Variables In The Stanford Prison Experiment
946 Words | 4 PagesEffects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
689 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Jail Experiment Summary
989 Words | 4 PagesPhilip Zimbardo: The Lucifer Effect
1254 Words | 6 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment And The Milgram Obedience Experiment
1379 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of The Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1575 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesBrief Summary Of The Video 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'
364 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men
983 Words | 4 PagesHow Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesWhat Are The Psychological Effects Of The Stanford Prison Study
392 Words | 2 Pages