My thoughts about Ehrenreich’s experiment is that it is ethical. I believe it to be ethical because even though she was artificial to that life she experienced situations and emotions that were real. In the first chapter, she worked at Jerry’s and she had a moment where she feared losing her job. Joy, the manager, pulled her aside and Ehrenreich thought “But instead of saying “You’re fired” she says, “You’re doing fine” (35). She thought that she was going to get fired but it turned out contrary to her expectations, she shows slight fear since those were her thoughts, which a person that weren’t taking this experiment seriously wouldn’t be putting effort into their job. Then she meets George and feels moved by his situation of being new to this country. So she …show more content…
Another things that she does is that she starts taking on the attitude of her co-workers. One of her co-workers once got sent out of her usual workspace which got her mad. Her co-worker felt out of place and did the work improperly. Later on, Ehrenreich also got switched out of her usual workplace to go finish her CSL. Ehrenreich looks around to see if Howard was anywhere near and tries to rush out the store without being noticed to go call the motels. Which I consider is her act of rebellion since she didn’t finish her CSL and wanted to do what she needed to do. Ehrenreich’s experiment isn’t unethical because she didn’t cause any harm to anyone or violate any laws. The only thing that can be considered unethical is that she lied on the last application and lied to her co-worker Pete that she was single. Ehrenreich didn’t lie to hurt anyone but to sort of benefit from them in the sense that they would have her back and she lied on the application to see if her chances of getting a job were different. Ehrenreich’s experiment, in my opinion, is to be considered only
“When Melissa is getting ready to leave work at six, I tell her I’m quitting, possibly the next day. Well then, she thinks she’ll be going too, because she doesn’t want to work here without me”(Ehrenreich 189). Throughout my reading of this book, I have notice that I could connect to various points the author is trying to portray. When I first read this passage is made me feel nostalgic to when I used to work in the hotel. The hotel work has terrible, but my co-workers were amazing.
She worried about her mom leaving or giving her up like her own mother did, she also thought that even good people could be bad if they had the opportunity so she didn’t
She uses her appeals to ethos, logos and pathos to convey the relatable experiences that low waged workers have run across while working in similar positions. These struggles that she has seen as a low waged worker run in line with the struggles that she has seen among her coworkers. Ehrenreich developed her focus on the struggles of low wage workers by her use of comparisons, antanagoge, and parenthesis. Through these different rhetorical devices, Ehrenreich revealed the work environment and the various living situations of low waged workers. She revealed true struggles that come along with little salary through her own life or the lives of her coworkers.
She wanted to express to her precious son to take on any opportunity that the universe threw at him for he is not the only one with admirable qualities. She urged him to carry on head strong no matter the circumstances and by providing all this support and love she sent him off with confidence and motivation to bring his mother “justice, fortitude, and every good virtue which can adorn a good citizen” (Adams). to continue making her
She expects George to stay away from her and feels entitled to the safety despite the
She begins with a sense of confusion by saying, “I knew my methods were wrong, but I didn't know what the right ones were.” Then it leads into a feeling of awareness of what could be going wrong, then anger for not having to be qualified. Through her lengthy list, she shows her distress and attempts to prove herself. Finally, it ends with a tone of disappointment as she feels like she failed herself and her boss, “I had never exactly been a wunderkind, but I had never failed at anything so spectacularly before. I wondered which would disappoint Grayson more—if I quit, or rode this job until the wheels fell off and the poor guy was forced to fire me.”
Camryn Dillavou Miss Putman Hour 4 15 November 2016 Argument Essay Charlie Gordon was a man many lives. He lived the majority of his life in a state of mental deficiency, having an IQ of 68. He worked as a janitor for the majority of his life. One day he had the opportunity of a lifetime.
Ashley, I concur that the Stanford Prison Experiment did, in fact, violate research ethics. I believe that Zimbardo’s research experiment violated the ACJS code, specifically, the experiment did expose participants to more than a minimal risk of personal harm, and the research purposes were not fully disclosed to the participants. Zimbardo himself also admitted that his research experiment violated these standards. I further believe that Zimbardo made several errors in his research including the fact that he gave himself a position in the experiment as “prison warden”. Clearly Zimbardo should have had another person play this role so he could remain independent, an error Zimbardo also admits to having done.
She saw that anything she set her mind to could be possible. As human beings we adapt and overcome with the right will power. Thus, going from homeless to Harvard is possible no matter what the
Title: In Cold Blood Author: Truman Capote Genre (include original copyright date): True crime (1965) Setting (remember setting is not just time and place): 1959 Holcomb, Kansas- small, rural town where the people feel safe; the conservative, church-going members of the community all know each other and trust one another “Good neighbors, people who care about each other” (33) “Theretofore sufficiently unfearful of each other to seldom trouble to lock their doors” (5) The Corner- Kansas State Penitentiary; Dick and Perry are on death row; no escaping Characters and Brief Description: Perry Smith- Responsible for the murder of the Clutter family; injured in a motorcycle accident and his “chunky, dwarfish legs….
Discuss the methodological and ethical issues which are apparent in this study. How have the findings impacted the psychological field? One methodological issue with the Bain et al refrigerator study is that type of experiment used. Having used a laboratory experiment, all variables were under strict control and this does not reflect the true nature of the situation the children were placed in. Children trapped inside a refrigerator would not escape by pressing a panel on the floor, thus the experiment has features which do not reflect an accurate representation of a real life situation (Bain et al, 1958).
The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.
Chris McCandless, whose story is analyzed in Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, is a young adult who decides to leave his known habits and material belongings behind and live a completely self-sufficient life in the wilderness, a choice which ultimately leads to his death. In doing that, he also forfeits his family and friends. With that in mind, a question can be posed regarding the ethics of said behavior. As a childless, single and financially independent man, Chris McCandless has absolute ownership of his body and thus his decision to continue doing a sport that he knows can kill him is ethically defensible.
The blue eyed – brown eyed experiment in my opinion is indeed ethical. The issue at hand with this experiment is will it cause permeant future psychological damage. Jane Elliott conducted this experiment with her third-grade students which some would say it is too harsh of an exercise for a group that young; She wanted to teach her student that discrimination is wrong which have been a topic they discussed from the first day of school but felt the student would become confused with the fact she just honored Dr. king in the month of February and now she had to explain to them that he was assassinated because of discrimination. Jane Elliott agreed that this exercise can do Psychological damage if not conducted correctly but the benefits are remarkable.
In my evidence one of the primary ethical justifications for conducting research with human subjects. Human experimentation can be needed to help everyone survive. Without human subjects or human experimentation the world wouldn't have things we need like medicine, cures for diseases, and more. While human experimentation can be bad or non-effective in helping people sometimes; but other times it can work