Eleanor of Aquitaine was an extremely influential woman who changed the way people live. She was born in the year of 1122 and lived to be 82 years old, which was extremely old in the middle ages. She was the daughter of William X and was raised to rule Aquitaine by him. At the age of fifteen, William X, died, leaving Aquitaine for Eleanor. She was forced to marry Louis VII, who became king of France. After many boring years with Louis and her two daughters, she obtained a divorce and married King Henry II of England. The fifteen years following her marriage with Henry were the most exciting years of her life. She had eight other children, among them were Richard and John Lackland. She was independent and was capable of ruling by herself. She …show more content…
After marrying Henry, she travelled frequently around England. She got a good overview of people’s lifestyle, their life conditions, and what systems and what laws they used. When she travelled around, she noticed that laws would change wherever she went. Many were unfair laws were present, where thievery and trickery was always present. “Laws differed from village to village, many people didn’t know what land they owned, criminals went unpunished, innocent men were hanged.” (Brooks, pg. 76). Trial by ordeal was commonly used. People would be put to trials to see if they were guilty or not. For example, a woman had to carry a red hot iron for three steps. After three days, if the burn was larger than the size of a walnut, then she would be guilty. People believed that god’s judgement decided whether you were guilty or not. Trial by combat would also be used in the middle ages. This wasn’t very fair because someone could accuse a person with a disadvantage who would obviously lose. This would cause many thefts. “Henry offered a fairer, more logical type of trial: trial by jury.” (Brooks, pg. 77). When Henry and Eleanor went to tour England, they changed trial by combat and ordeal to trial by jury, which was a lot fairer and “closer to god’s judgement.” We still use trial by jury today. Also, in Eleanor’s late years, she made another tour of her lands. She found that values of money and the units of measurement were completely different in different places. She changed them and made a set of measurements that everyone used. She unified the money systems so that everyone used the same system of money. This got rid of a lot of confusion, and some of the measurements used back then are still used
In Act IV of The Crucible Elizabeth Proctor was accused and found guilty. In many cases its very difficult to tell if people are innocent or not. Even though the accused swear under oath, doesn’t mean that they will keep that promise. In some cases an innocent person is said to be guilty and are punished for a crime that they did not commit.
The jury system originated in England hundreds of years ago. The colonists brought the jury system from England to the United States. In 1733, John Zenger, a printer, printed a newspaper critical for the British Government. His attorney convinced the jury to be in favor for Zenger because his criticisms were true. After this trial, it gave ordinary citizens the freedom of speech and the power to go against the king.
During the Salem Witch Trials in 1692, they used to tie accused witches to chairs and throw them in a lake, if they sank they were innocent. The Salem Witchcraft Trials were crazy, irrational and disturbing times. Young girls accused their neighbors and strangers of practicing witchcraft. The town decided to hold trials to see whether or not the accused really were witches. While they awaited their trials, they were held in a filthy jail.
This was just the beginning of the trials. These trials alone resulted in two hundred people accused and placed before the
The trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts. The trials were largely driven
Nineteen people were hung due to false judgement by human nature and society. Taking place in a small village called Salem, inside of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, during a depressing seventeenth century, was a movement that would challenge the nation’s religious and psychological beliefs. Innocent people were being accused of witchcraft, when rather they were just ill or not taken care of properly by family and friends. Thought to be caused by stress, fear, and panic, the Salem Witch Trials was an event that changed the nation’s view on mental illness because of false assumptions and mischievous behavior. The Salem Witch Trials was a series of false accusations of witchcraft taking place in Salem, which during the seventeenth century, was apart of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
It was a series of hearings before local magistrates, which led to county court trials to persecute people accused of witchcraft. Trials took place against the theocratic, Puritan British colony where the church ruled in civil matters.
The accused are brought to trials, imprisoned, then and/or hanged. These trials are not fair and do not need proof. An accusation is enough to implicate an innocent person. Finally, by 1692, a suspension on the trials for witch craft was suspended by Governor William Philips of Massachusetts, some ministers, and clergy who believed that justice was not being followed.
Even thought the volatile relationship of Eleanor of Aquitaine with Henry II`s (1154-1189), she was a regent queen in the first decade of her husband`s reign and she issued the charters for England and Aquitaine, sat in justice at court, and helped prepare her children to
She gave him a male heir he wished and died shortly after. Dickens was sure that Jane would have been executed if she had not died of fever after giving birth. Then he married Anne of Cleves (1540), who was a protestant German princess. Thomas Cromwell arranged the marriage, and that was his downfall. Henry did not like her, and said that she was “a Flanders mare”.
She and her sister, Cassandra liked to work together on her work. Jane would do the writing while Cassandra put her artistic ability to good use and drew pictures to go along with the stories. The kids from oldest to youngest was James, George, Edward, Henry, Cassandra ( her mother was also named Cassandra), Francis, Jane, and Charles. Jane was born in December of 1775. She was educated pretty much by her
Juror are randomly chosen citizens brought in to watch and interpret the case, and break it down and decide whether the defendant is guilty or not. Reginald Rose´s 12 Angry Men was written after while watching real murder trial it inspired him to reveal the positives and negatives of Jury deliberations. While bench trial have strong merits, trial by Jury is more effective for many reasons including,the diversity and variety of backgrounds the jurors bring, the increase chance of discovering the truth, as well as, the fact that Jurors are usually more caring then a Judge who may be calloused from previous experiences is why trial by Jury is the fairest way to decide a criminal case. A significant advantage trial by jury offer is the diversity and variety in backgrounds the Jurors. While the Jurors were discussing the stab wound Juror Five presents the relevant the point with his jurors saying, ¨ You don 't hold this of knife that way.
When Arthur died Henry got a letter from the priest confirming that Henry had permission to marry his late brothers wife Catherine for political reasons (not for love). They were married for about 20 years and during their 20 years of marriage they had one child, a girl and her name was Mary Seymour. However, King Henry didn’t want a daughter, he wanted a son that would one
This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,
If they had a court system many would use it to appeal the decision to exile Gulliver or that of being placed in a caste, thus illustrating the flaw of not having such a