It is generally agreed upon that a contract plays an important role in our daily lives. Each day as we buy a drink, take a flight on an aeroplane, purchase furniture or even enrol in a college, we are entering into a contract. A contract is defined as an agreement that is made between two or more parties, giving rise to legal rights and obligations that is enforceable by the law. Contracts are normally written but it can be spoken or implied, and generally have to do with sale, employment, lease, or tenancy. A contractual relationship is confirmed by an offer, acceptance of the offer, and a valid (legal and valuable) consideration. Each one gathering to an agreement secures rights and obligations with respect to the right and obligations of …show more content…
According to Section 2(b) of the Contracts Act specifies that when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted: a proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise. Acceptance may be communicated, that is oral or in written form, and intimated from the conduct of the offeree. An acceptance should likewise conform to specific rules before it gets to be substantial and enforceable. Unless the proposer objects, failure to accept in detailed form refutes the acceptance. Section 7(a) also states that the acceptance must be absolute and inadequate which implies that the intention of the offeree to accept must be unmistakably understood with certainty, from his conduct. There are various circumstances in the certain situations where the behavior of specific parties gives off an impression of acceptance however the law does not perceive such conduct as acceptance. The case of Entorres V Miles Far East (1955) is a famous case regarding to this matter. The claimant sent a telex message from England offering to purchase 100 tons of Cathodes from the defendants in Holland. The defendant sent back a telex from Holland to the London office accepting that offer. The question for the court was at what point the contract came into existence. If the acceptance was effective from the time the telex was sent the contract was made in Holland and Dutch law would apply. If the acceptance took place when the …show more content…
Every term of an agreement must be certain or capable of being ascertained. Where the terms of an agreement are not certain, the contract is void according to Section 30 CA 1950. Even though a manifestation of intention is intended to be understood as an offer, it cannot be accepted so as to form a contract unless the terms of the contract are reasonably certain. The terms of a contract are reasonably certain if they provide a basis for determining the existence of a breach and for giving an appropriate remedy. The fact that one or more terms of a proposed bargain are left open or uncertain may show that a manifestation of intention is not intended to be understood as an offer or as an acceptance. In matters of obligation, a thing is certain when its essence, quality, and quantity are described and distinctly set forth. It is uncertain, when the description is not that of one individual object, but designates only the kind. Certainty is the mother of repose, and therefore the law aims at certainty. If a contract be so ambiguous in its terms that its meaning cannot be certainly collected and the statute of frauds preclude the admissibility of parol evidence to clear up the difficulty, or parol evidence cannot supply the defect, then neither at law nor in equity can effect be given to it. By certainty is understood a clear and distinct statement of the facts which constitute the cause of action, or ground of defense, so that they may be
The court back up their reasoning by explaining that in a written contract it “is presumed to be "the final memorial of the parties' agreement” and that the clause in the contract must be followed to complete Jennings’ side of the contract. The court agreed with
The Social Contract is the concept where we the people give up some of our rights to the government in exchange for protection and security from them. One important way the United States moves closer towards the Social
Under that rule, `an acceptance must be coextensive with the offer and may not introduce additional terms or conditions.” (McLaughlin v. Heikkila 2005) The offeree in this case McLaughlin did not sign, or write an acceptance letter to the counteroffer Hekkila
According to this, human beings live as individuals in a society, they must establish a contract whereby they agree
Like mention in source A, according to Socrates, agreements affect a group 's ability to do something. If a leader does not abide by the said agreement or contract, those ¨leaders” may be making some wrongful decisions. As a leader, say National Honor Society president you are required to follow the rules in order for others to do the same. Abiding by the agreement or contract of your group can help you become a more superior leader in the future.
However, it must be determined whether Das’s promise to come until Monday constitutes sufficient consideration. Since, no deposit was made that is there was not sufficient consideration. Das would have to prove that he gave some sort of consideration to Ali to keep the offer open and if Das has taken a bank loan, the court may consider it as a valid consideration. Otherwise, the agreement does not stand according to the law. Therefore, Das cannot have any legal action against
The social contract is a theoretical concept that describes the relationship between individuals and the state. In this relationship, individuals agree to give up some of their freedoms in exchange for protection
By saying this, the authors show they have tried to set agreed terms with
Terms which the communications of the parties concur or which are generally put forward in a writing expected by the parties as a last expression of their agreement regarding such terms as are incorporated in that may not be denied by confirmation of any former declaration or of a coexisting oral understanding yet may be clarified or supplemented. (https://www.law.cornell.edu) Additionally, necessities put forward in Section 2-201 must first be fulfilled if the agreement as adjusted is inside of its stipulations. Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code. A case of this segment can be Fairway Mach.
This illustrates a social contract clearly. These men who created this compact are agreeing to give up some of their freedom by following different laws, and acts among other things, and are promising that they will follow these new rules diligently. Previously to this statement, it is explained why these men are willing to give up some of their freedom,
Is past consideration regarded as adequate and sufficient when determining the validity of a contract? B. LAW Doctrine of promissory estoppel In contract law, it is a general rule that where a party to the contract makes a representation in form of a promise to another party relating to the contract, such party is restrained from reneging regardless of nonexistence of consideration (Jill, 2012, p. 148).
Issue What is a contract? A contract is a binding agreement that the courts enforce. Decision
Principal United Nations human rights conventions and covenants are treaties, and covenants are agreements, while parties are A group of voters organized for the purpose of influencing governmental policy. The human rights also required an agreement to the 30 rules which Canada agreed
After these contracts are established, however, then society becomes possible, and people can be expected to keep their promises, cooperate with one another, and so on. I believe that thanks to the social contract we created justice and established what is moral and immoral for the whole society and not only on what we think could be moral or immoral. This topic may be controversial for some people because they will probably think that even though the social contract was created to be equal for all people there are some things until today that does not apply for all. But for me that is not a strong reason to do not believe in the Social contract I strongly believe in this theory because this is what makes a civil society with justice and morality. A philosopher Stuart Rachels suggests that, “ morality is the set of rules governing behavior that rational people accept, on the condition that others accept them too”.