The question above calls for the detailed analysis of the Criminal Damage Act 1971, hereby as, CDA 1971, and how it is to be applied at situation which involve property damage and punishments for the required act. Further discussion would also include the situation where a threat is used to destroy property damage according to the CDA 1971. In order to apply the CDA 1971, we need to know, what criminal damage actually means. Criminal damage is any damage which has been caused by an individual to some form of property. When a case is concerned with damage to property which is criminal, the case is brought by the state against that individual in a criminal court and the most common examples of criminal damage would be arson.
A comparison between the Due process model and crime control model Within the criminal justice system, there are two competing models: the crime control model and the due process model. These two models were constructed by Robert Packer and each represents a particular school of thought. In managing crime, there is the individual i.e. the suspect and there is the society. The due process model is seen to focus on the suspect whereas the crime control model focuses on the society.
The dependent variable is planned and/or committed crimes. The independent variable is whether they are in a domestic terrorist group or not. To study the dependent variable a survey could be used in which local, state, or federal law enforcement organizations would be contacted to find out how many people were arrested over a certain amount of time, and how many of those arrested planned and/or committed crimes that were labeled as domestic terrorism. This study would have more general questions. How many arrests were made?
A theory is a set of statements or principles developed to explain a group of facts or phenomena. It has been repeatedly tested and used to make predictions. Theories in this category attempt to explain why an individual commits a crime or delinquent behaviors. The primary goal of criminological theory is to help one gain an understating of why and how certain things are related to criminal behavior (Bohm and Vogel, 2011). Theories dissect the making and the breaking of the law, criminal different behavior, as well as patterns of criminal activity.
This crime was one that was planned. The objective of criminological theories is to help one gain an understating of crime and criminal justice. Speculations cover the making and the infringing upon of the law, criminal and degenerate conduct, and additionally examples of criminal movement All of the listed theories play an important role regarding the reason why Aaron Hernandez committed the
Stress and subsequent aggression may also be induced due to perceptions of injustice in the workplace. As stated earlier, Robert Agnew’s General Strain Theory argues that strain is a cause of criminal behavior. He expands upon Robert Merton’s Anomie Theory to include several causes of strain. His categories of strain that produce deviance are, the failure to achieve positively valued goals, the loss of positive encouragement, and the introduction of negative stimuli. Simply put, when people are treated poorly, they may become upset and resort to criminal behavior.
Many of the chapters of the author focuses on racism and profiling which Palmiotto addresses as major concern. The author also takes focus on addressing the occurrence of both deadly and non-deadly use of force and how both are being used by the police. Psychological aspect is also explored by the author in concern with the use of force. It takes the side of restricting use of force by the police reform which relates to another source on taking the same
In examining the role of expert testimony in criminal law cases, there are several factors to be considered; the most significant is the question of what weight is given to the expert witnesses’ testimony and what affect this has on the outcome. In cases to determine whether an offender ought to be labeled as a dangerous offender, these questions have reaching implications. The medicalization of deviancy, and the role of expert witnesses in presenting their psychological and psychiatric findings to the court, deeply affects the outcomes for the offenders involved. By medicalizing risk and relying on diagnoses such as psychopathy, the medical experts’ testimony contributes to the pathologizing of criminal individuals and leads to higher rates of dangerous offender designations.
On the other hand, Criminal law includes prosecution of criminal offenses and the punishment of crimes. An individual convicted of a criminal crime stands face-to-face a court. The Jury is considered as fundamental part of the court in criminal offenses. The Jury system has a significant role in legal proceeding of defining facts and making final decisions. Moreover, “Twelve Angry Men”, “Gideon’s Trumpet”, “A few Good Men” movies are viewed as three wholly different stories, while there are some similarities between them.
The criminal justice system is comprised of a myriad of steps for the purpose of bringing those responsible for committing crimes to justice. There are three primary categories which make up the criminal justice system. The first category is the “Police”, who are responsible for determining the type and magnitude of the potential crime and if it did indeed occur. They will begin by investigating to determine who is involved in the crime. Once the investigation reveals the identity of the perpetrator(s) then they will seek out those responsible for the purpose of arresting them for the crimes they are accused of committing.