Dockterman's Argument In The Digital Parent Trap

There is a lot of evidence from both passages that gives good information. Passage 1 has more about how she helped start it and was pretty successful on what she did. The facts help me understand more about Elizabeth Stanton and what she did. Both of the passages give lots of great

The author utilizes inductive reasoning and provides sufficient and accurate mix of relevant evidence to support his claims. In addition, the tone of the paper allows her to properly connect with the audience and effectively communicate her assertions. Furthermore, the author possesses the necessary skills, knowledge, education, and expertise and refrains from letting her postmodernism world view cause biased or unwarranted assumptions. Therefore, I conclude that the author adequately supports her claims and attains her objective of fostering an understanding of the role of the brain in promoting superstitious phenomena to the

Klein takes advantage of this phenomenon and incorporates these companies into her essay. By doing this, she makes a stronger connection with her readers and allows her claim to more easily

Her passion towards the issue can be seen throughout the passage. Her emotions are clear and it strengthens her message. By utilizing pathos, the author successfully conveyed her message. Florence Kelley’s message was effective towards her audience. By using rhetorical strategies she was successful in conveying her message.

Being admirable is something you definitely want to be and after reading the Story “The Marble Champ” I can determine that Lupe Medrano is definitely an admirable character. Whether it's her Intelligence, good sportsmanship or, determination. I and so many others will always look up to

Also, the high-five is used to show appreciation. This argument is an appealing and interesting argument. The author’s opinion is clearly stated with no ambiguity, and a careful read of the article will show this. Additionally, this topic will appeal to a broad audience, it can be read and interpret by a young or old audience. The argument will provoke readers to think about the meanings of “awesome” and “suck”.

However; despite not having an opposition, Sandberg still makes herself a trustworthy author. What makes Sheryl Sandberg a trustworthy author is that she has a lot of logical points, due to experience and statistics. Using her experience with school and

What I particularly enjoyed the most out of the entire article was the author’s independent thought and strength of questions. You can tell right out of the gate that he knows the Summa Theologica and Treatise on Happiness like the back of his hand. Not only were the questions and commentary thought provoking and rational, but the article was extremely well organized and much easier to read than many other academic articles I’ve read in the past. The summary was clear, the arguments logical and sound, the proof undeniable and continually cited, and the thought process was easy to follow. In relation to today’s political life, I would say the most fundamental lesson from this review is to continually question the environment in front of and behind you, be it a philosophical heavyweight such as Aquinas, or your local or federal government.

The connotations of light are widely understood which allows Duffy’s poetry to be widely accessible. Sean O’Brien praises her on this claiming her poetry is ‘as open to the reader of Catherine Cookson [ the most widely read author of the United Kingdom] as to the educated student of the

One of the qualities that I really admired and Capt. Janeway was her positive attitude. Some of her sayings and ways of looking at scenarios were comforting and even applicable to my situations growing up. I felt that way about captains from other series but I derived more comfort from hearing what she had to say. Her character is also hyper-conscientious.