ipl-logo

Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Speech

447 Words2 Pages

If you had a chance to save people, and didn’t take it, are you as guilty as the person who put them into that position? Some people argue that if it doesn’t affect them it isn’t their problem, but isn’t it? The rights of people are ours to protect. So if you choose not to speak, you are helping the oppressor and end up letting people stomp all over you. Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor, believed that speaking out was the only way to end the problems in our world. When giving his nobel prize speech he said, “we must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented” (Wiesel). When people stay silent they are just prolonging people’s suffering and allowing their rights to be taking away. If you choose to stay silent you are unwittingly joining the side of the oppressor. He also talked about the importance of speaking even after the wrong was fixed. He said “I have tried to keep the memory alive - I have tried to fight those who would forget. Because if we forget, we are guilty. We are accomplices” …show more content…

Some do think that if they stay out of a problem no harm can come to them. They don’t stop and think that by allowing other people’s rights to be taken away, they are allowing their rights to be taken away. In To Kill a Mockingbird, the character Atticus said to his daughter, “if I didn’t [become Tom’s Lawyer] I couldn’t hold up my head in town, I couldn’t represent this country in the legislature, I couldn’t even tell you or Jem not to do something.... Because I could never ask you to mind me again” (Lee 75-76). If Atticus didn’t follow his morals and allowed Tom Robinson to be convicted it would go against everything he believed in. He couldn’t tell his children right from wrong because he’d but be a hypocrite if he did so. You are guilty the moment you don’t act against something you feel is

Show More
Related

  • Acceptance Speech Of 1986 By Elie Wiesel Summary

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Elie Wiesel’s acceptance speech of 1986 he stated that “when human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must –at that moment – become the center of the universe.” Considering the events that occurred in World War I, such as the Holocaust, I strongly agree with Wiesel’s statement about making those who are endangered our priority. It is the duty of those who inhabit this world to protect and set the imprisoned free regardless the circumstances. If no one has the courage to step up and do something to help, the oppressor will end up believing that treating people unjustly and forbid them from their freedom is indeed right.

    Read More

  • How Does Elie Wiesel Use Rhetorical Appeals In Keep Memory Alive

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “In Keep Memory Alive” he says”That I have tried to keep the memory alive,I have tried to fight those who would forget, Because if we forget we are guilty, we are accomplices”. He uses repetition in his speech so well. He delivered his speech in silence, he does

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference By Martin Niemöller

    1005 Words  | 5 Pages

    When Ellie Weisel says “Indifference, then, is not only a sin it is a punishment” he makes a powerful claim about human nature. An example of this is the Nazi invasion of Europe, where many countries did not stop the Nazis from murdering the Jewish people. They chose to remain silent because they were scared of the Nazis fighting back. When faced with opposition it is better to speak up than show indifference and stay silent.

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference And Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

    636 Words  | 3 Pages

    And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor—never his victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten.” showing that people who just were just overlooking what has happened made the people who were the victims of the cruel events that are and were happening feel forgotten due to no one trying to help at that

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On George Floyd

    1259 Words  | 6 Pages

    According to The Washington Post, an interview with Emily Boa, a protester in the George Floyd movement claims that “‘if we stopped protesting because we’re scared . . . they’ll win.’” Boa asserts that when one does not take action and protest, the opposing side will succeed. Philosopher and humanist Elie Wiesel expressed similar ideas, stating that “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”

    Read More

  • Bystanders In Night By Elie Wiesel

    691 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wiesel gives an example of this in his speech when he says “Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.” So many Germans had opportunities to stand up for what was just and right. For the lives of Jews, Gypsies, and fellow Germans but refrained front doing so aiding Hitler in his mass

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

    Read More

  • Resistance During The Holocaust Essay

    956 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Holocaust, a great number of brave individuals wondered whether they should have reacted to the Nazi forces through passive or violent acts of resistance. Any form of resistance was vital for even the slightest possibility of survival for the jews. In “Resistance During the Holocaust”, “The Diary of Anne Frank”, and “Violins of Hope,” it gave real examples of Jewish people who chose to arm themselves and fight the Nazis head on or Jews who opted for passivity in order to hide their loved ones. Nevertheless, the main goal of these methods for resistance was to defy the enemy at hand that was the Nazi party. Therefore, people can best respond to conflict by active resistance in order to avoid late shame and humiliation, escape the

    Read More

  • Bearing In Elie Wiesel's Night

    901 Words  | 4 Pages

    There is a set time frame between life and death. Once the line is crossed, there is no return. This is why Elie Wiesel feels it is so important to bear witness. Bearing witness is to be a constant observer, to consider all possibilities, and to act when it is time. Elie Wiesel wrote his memoir Night so people could learn to act when it is necessary.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel's Speech: The Perils Of Indifference

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    Elie Wiesel made a speech called, "The Perils of Indifference. " In which he believes that indifference is evil. Elie Wiesel is correct that indifference is corrupt because it makes people not care, and it makes other people suffer. Indifference makes people not care about something or someone. In Elie Wiesel's speech called, "The Perils of Indifference", he articulated, "Sixty years ago, its human cargo -- maybe 1,000 Jews -- was turned to Nazi Germany.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Martin Luther King Jr.'s Nobel Peace Prize Speech

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Martin Luther King Jr.’s Nobel Peace Prize speech, he continued to help the audience see the importance of a non-violent approach to fighting against segregation and for equality. Martin shows us this by using allusion and symbolism to further prove his points. When using allusion, King quotes, “And the lion and the lamb shall lie down together…” from the Bible. By using this quote, Luther can be inferencing many things. For example, the lamb is seen to coward down to the lion seeing as the lion at the top of the food chain, he can be comparing the oppressed to the lamb and the oppressor to the lion because it’s all the time that the person being oppressed stays quiet and takes it all in.

    Read More

  • Acceptance Speech For The Nobel Peace Prize By Elie Wiesel

    477 Words  | 2 Pages

    “And I tell him that I have tried. That I have tried to keep memory alive,that I have tried to fight those who would forget. Because if we forget,we are guilty,we are accomplices[Acceptance Speech for the Nobel peace Prize].”By using this quote by Elie Wiesel this can support that we as humans try to remember things so we can move on and learn from our mistakes. Which then explains that by hearing or reading stories from people can help inform us. Literature can help us remember and honor the victims of the Holocaust by telling us their experience,hardships,and feelings.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel Acceptance Speech Analysis

    476 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1986 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Elie Wiesel, makes two strong statements in his acceptance speech. Wiesel was 15 years old when he entered the camp in Auschuitz. His mom and little sister got killed as soon as they got to the gates. His father went into the gates with him the first time. He moved in January 1945 to Buchenwald in a cattle car.

    Read More

  • Franklin D Roosevelt Persuasive Speech

    590 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt was in office through one of the most challenging times in American history; the great depression. This was a time when jobs were lessening and the country was in need of a boost. Being our president, many people look up and rely on the actions of him. In this specific time, President Roosevelt needed to put himself in the position of a fellow American citizen as well as remain his leadership role as president. To give the country the little boost of positivity, President Roosevelt constructed his broadcast that aired on October 22, 1933.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King's Speech Summary

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Martin Luther King’s famous speech, King argued for freedom of African Americans by using metaphors to illustrate the serious effects and tolerance of discrimination in society. To motivate the public to take action, King created a scenario on how the Africans were treated amongst their white peers. “ the negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity” Moreover, King used a metaphor to highlight the ignorance of African Americans by representing their isolation as an “island of poverty”. In addition, he represented the white people’s capability of wealth in the perspective of an African American as being “in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity”. In other words, the effects of

    Read More

More about Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Speech

Open Document