Elitism Vs Rationalism Research Paper

The Importance of Rationality At often times one may believe that making decisions should be predominantly based upon what one may feel or desire, though in reality such process frequently results in negative consequences, thus why in the process of making decisions, love should not overtake rationality. When love is prioritized in decision making, it tends to cause thoughts that typically won’t better the situation for those who are involved, while rationality would instead provide the proper reasoning to create a suitable outcome. In the process of making decisions, love should not overtake rationality.

The advancements in technology range from multiple

By far, the largest advancement of the

Michael Oakeshott, an English Philosopher, was a conservative thinker who wrote on the topic of rationalism and its effects on political life. In his essay “Rationalism in Politics” Oakeshott is fast to characterize rationalists, stating that they are “...thought free from obligation to any authority...” and that they have “...no opinion, no habit, no belief, nothing so widely held that he hesitates to question it and to judge it by what he calls his ‘reason’.” (Oakeshott pg.6) Moreover, Oakeshott continues throughout his article to characterize rationalists by explaining two types of knowledge. The first type of knowledge he coins is technical while the second type of knowledge is practical.

One main technological advancement brought to space was the Hubble space telescope. This telescope is still used today and was brought up by the shuttle Discovery on April 24, 1990. This telescope brought lots of information for the USA to use. This information is still used today; just the other day, a picture of a black hole was taken a long way

“According to the text “rationalism” is based on deductive logic reasoning from the general to particular or applying theory to a particular case; however, “empiricism” is based on inductive logic reasoning from particular to general or moving from specific facts to theory” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 14). I believe people who commit crime consider the consequences of their actions; however, I think they base it on the punishment rendered, or they just don’t care. Crime is not the result of a criminal personality; nevertheless, it’s a poorly integrated psyche because in my opinion people are not born criminals. People are of freewill and responsible for the actions. The Enlightenment thinkers believe that human behaviors were considered to be motived

Rationalism is beliefs in the external world that give somethings like a power or transcendent being. Empiricism is belief in sensation experience that looks like a science. I think both concepts are conflict in some situation and compatible in some situation. For example, you can’t test or examination about the God’s existence but you can’t say it is true or false or meaningless because may be verified in the future. The paradigm of Positivism seems to be combined of Rationalism and Empiricism.

In Epistemology, there are sub categories as well. These are called Rationalism and Empiricism. Rationalism will be discussed in this paper, and there are two philosophers that follow this method. There names are Rene Descartes and Plato. Plato and Descartes are two Greek philosophers that believe in Rationalism, yet both have a different perspective of it.

1. The difference between Post-Empiricism and Critical Rationalism: Critical Rationalism has been discussed to, as the system of falsification. A point is a form of rationalism insofar as it embraces knowledge (or other psychological state and capabilities) about some specific subject matter, drives from the use of reason or more commonly from the rational nature (Kuhn, 1970:231). Rationalism is the view that rational instincts are the most essential way of obtaining knowledge (Dick, 1993:53).

As Homo sapiens, we pride ourselves on the fact that we can construct coherent thought and form sound analysis through piecing together clear identifiable building blocks in a process known as reason. It is an instinctual process and we define it as the key feature that separates us from other species. Reason is the method or rather tool used to think in a distinct and organized way in order to achieve knowledge and understanding. Its importance and significance is in its method and the end toward which it is used defines the validity of the method. Reason is the method that allows us to determine how to gather information and what kind of information we need.

Silva, Maria Georgina T. 1PHL1 15 September 2014 Insight Essay #1 Logical Reasoning Put to the Test In order to fully understand the act of philosophizing, one must develop certain traits. I can say that mine is logical reasoning. Can you just imagine living without knowing anything? You’ll just sit there and let everything around you happen because you don’t know what’s the reason why all these things are happening around you?

Overall, the rational is but an attempt to define the undefinable. To understand Otto’s rejection of the rational, the rational must be understood. “Rational,” in The Idea of the Holy, refers to the conceptualization of religion and the divine itself. Otto’s basic definition of the rational stems from the establishment and application of concepts evidenced in “they can be grasped by the intellect; they can be analyzed by thought; they even admit of definition. An object that can thus be thought conceptually may be termed rational” (Otto, 1).

So most of the people know what is a rational choice but still act irrationally and make poor financial decision. So now the real question is why human beings do this. The main reason is that most of us are lazy or do not have time to think thru the ups and downs of a decision. So why shouldn’t people make irrational decisions. It is because most of the time making irrational decision might make people worse of than

We can't think apart from the concept of civilization in science and technology. The improvement of the quality of a civilization is directly proportional to the development of Science and technology. It has a direct effect on the development of civilization, science and technology. As an example, in ancient times science and technology because they do not have a cure for many diseases could be found by killing the sick person and the illness they were doing. It was causing a loss of population, which is the basis of this civilization.

Lizeth Tinoco Professor Stephanie Arms English 101 22 February 2018 Benefits of Being Rational Although arrogance gets in the way of rationality, our understandings of different matters of the world shape us into believing what to be is true and what is not true. To be rational means that one is able to think logically or critically with reason. A critical thinker is not someone who expresses just the first thought that comes into mind, they have to think more than two times to be rational and express something that is important. Being rational is being able to weigh options to make the best decisions, like in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” when the prisoner returns to the cave, he learns that the reality is outside the cave and what he’s