J. Anderson Coats use of dual narratives definitely made this book more interesting I was able to better understand the characters, understand the history of the time. And the book itself. Although at bits it was confusing I think that overall the dual narrative was crucial to the story. The dual narrative helped me understand the difference between characters. It was easier to understand during Cecily's parts when Gwinny would call her a brat and she could say that because Gwinny wasn’t a rich entitled little girl who never had servants do everything for her.
The main reason literary devices are used is to connect with the reader. When we read, we want to truly enjoy what is written we need to become a part of the story. And literary devices help us to better see and feel the storyline. A good storyline captures all of our senses, these devices draw the reader in, paint a picture, heighten the senses, and pull at us emotionally. Throughout Nathaniel Hawthorne's short story The Birthmark, some of the key literary devices used were irony symbol and theme.
In “One of these days”, the foreshadowing of the social status of the dentist made the conflict between the two characters to be seen as a twist as the mayor was in much higher status. The conflict would not have seen such dramatic if there weren’t any explanation of dentist. Even if the rebellion was quite temporary, the settings provided at the first part of the plot helps the story to maintain the tension while reading. Likewise, the foreshadowing that implied the upcoming danger of Billy in “The Landlady”also provides the readers with the tension as they will feel anxiety until the actual incidence happens. The readers could have noticed the mood of the story because of numerous foreshadowing.
As some people believe, switching to omniscient would be the ideal POV because the view of others is needed to display Miss Strangeworth’s letter fell out of the mailbox; however, since the author only switches once, third-person single vision is still the better option as it is implemented more throughout the story. In the story,
Throughout the novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, Zora Neale Hurston uses a variety of styles of writing such as metaphors, sentence structure and length, and imagery. These, along with other effective literary devices used, help the reader can capture stronger grasp on the novel and what they just read. To add to that statement, the use of these devices are not limited through this part of Hurston's novel. In fact, many places in this expert from the novel, the reader can notice these devices used. Metaphors are a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
These trials give us an opportunity to grow and transform our lives. In the same way, as Faber said, we need texture when we read a book. We need to feel the paper within our hands, the scent a book holds, and skim our fingers over the words. We need texture in our lives, just like we need it in a book. Fahrenheit 451 reminds us why it is important to include literature in our lives.
Without one or the other, the novel would not have the same effect on the reader. The difference between the dialogue and the narrative is clear and important, but it also gives a message for the reader from McCarthy. What McCarthy is trying to tell all the readers with the contrasting dialogue and narration is that neither is a bad way to write. The dialogue which is simple and to the point is also very informative and the narration which is complex and elongated to extreme degrees is elegant and thought-provoking. McCarthy shows the reader that two writing styles that would be seen as bad at first can be made to work perfectly to fit the theme of a novel through The
Without these elements, there would not be a story to tell, for literary elements are crucial to the creation of a story. Having well developed characters, descriptive settings, and prominent symbols within the novel as well as other elements, gives a story meaning and is also the foundation of writing a story. McCarthy has provided an example of incorporating many literary elements in his story, showing how it has made his story well developed, keeping the story interesting and the reader interested. The most significant impact of the strong use of literary elements in this work of literature is showing how essential it is for a well developed
This help the author be more believable in the essay. Telling each section in different perspective help this essay from being bias. Also this allowed the readers to connect with character but not only the author. Ascher is very effective in using personal experience to prepare the reader for her conclusion. The three stories were very different from one another and this allow Ascher to effectively express a universal definition of compassion and empathy.
These people are crucial in starting epidemics because they know many things. The novel also says, “The fact that Mavens want to help, for no reason at all other than because they like to help, turns out to be an awfully good way of getting someone’s attention” (Gladwell, 67). Mavens and connectors are similar in many ways. Both have similar characteristics, but one could not function properly without one another. For instance, Connectors need the information and Mavens need people to spread the information.
The ideas presented in Anabelle 's paper reflected on her understanding of Zinn 's history and brought ideas that I, personally, never thought of, which showed her critical thinking skills. She grasped the core of Zinn 's writing thoughts and contributed her own ideas, which I agreed with, and the level of vocabulary and language Anabelle used also allowed for her essay to be easily read and persuasive. I really admired her interpretations because they were accurate and I was able to tell she spent time interpretating Zinn 's words and ideas. Her use of language and certain vocabulary emphasized the points she was getting across, also her quotes. The quotes helped Anabelle 's thoughts, but she didn 't source them, which would had made her essay
I don 't have an issue with social media as a method for communication, but there are many things that cannot be released to the public due to their sensitive nature. Over communication is great in my opinion and letting folks know about changes really increases the buy-in.” I completely agree with Chief about the “face-to-face” communication. It is of my observation that we as AFSPC/USSTRATCOM, rely too much on emails for making important decisions. Of course, we all may have a different definition of “important”. Regardless, I believe “face-to-face” communication will always be the best method of communication for important decision making and relationship building.
The big picture is that these three people are crucial to epidemics because of their abilities, but if Connectors are not as crucial as they used to be, there is now a whole different argument. Gladwell’s argument is that Mavens give news to Connectors who then share the news with everyone. Since Watts has disproved that connectors are crucial in creating epidemics, there is only the Mavens and the Salespeople. There is no need for Connectors because of new technology, but there is still need for Mavens because of their knowledge, and Salespeople because of their persuasion. There is still a need for Connectors when it comes to some things.