Embryonic Stem Cell Research is Vital
The embryo a very early life form, so early it’s not really even a child yet; inside of it embryonic stem cells have form. These cells carry great potential for medical advancement. With them many lives can be saved, that is why the research needs to continue. Embryonic research is worth the loss of some embryos; the embryonic stem cells gained through the process can and have reduced the suffering of many, can be used to create insulin which could one day lead to a cure for diabetes, and can also grow new human organs.
The embryonic stem cells gained through the process can and have reduced the suffering of many. As Professor Armin Curt said “To find something that can repair the spinal cord is a huge breakthrough. If we can show that something has changed for the better [as a result of stem cell therapy] that’s fundamental” (Adams Web). Shows how stem cells have and can help people in the future. “Derivation of
…show more content…
However, the concept has only been achieved in the mouse, whereas inefficient reprogramming and poor embryonic development characterizes the results obtained in primates” (Nature Web). These advances could save many lives. Could change the way we live forever.
Embryonic stem cells can be used to create beta cells that will produce insulin and could become the cure for diabetes. As shown by this, “Recent studies have demonstrated the ability to coax embryonic stem cells into insulin producing cells in lab” (Langwith
Dr. Khan seems to think that embryonic stem cell research is a good idea, since in the matter of the research it helps with diseases and injuries. While Bill Nye knows it is a helpful idea in science but not
Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.
For example, Alzheimer’s disease is a disease that is caused by brain cell death. Alzheimer’s does not have a cure, and the only treatment for it is medication that will slow the death of cells. However, if embryonic stem cells were used, they could replace and, theoretically, stop the death of brain cells, which would in turn, halt the disease. So overall, this treatment could dramatically benefit patients struggling through diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, cancer, and diabetes. Furthermore, the increase of quality of life for these living people is more than worth the possible destruction of a cluster of
For these reasons, embryonic stem cell research should be discouraged. According to the National Institutes of
Many people argue that the embryo dies from this, which is why I thought I was going to be against this. But, there ways that stem cell research can be done without killing embryos. Also, the research from this could potentially lead to the cure of cancer which would save millions of lives. One of the biggest
Embryonic stem cell research was established in the early 80’s and has since sparked into a highly controversial issue involving religious debates over the use of human embryos. Embryonic stem cells are considered to be unspecialized cells, which can be manipulated into specialized cells such as a skin cell or a heart cell. The specialized cells could potentially cure conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cystic fibrosis, and spinal cord injuries. Despite the large amount of ethical complications that come along with the utilization of stem cells, I advocate that stem cell research should be expanded and developed more widely in the medical field.
There are many questions about the morality of taking stem cell from one person or embryo and using it to heal another person. “The answer depends, in part, on whether we believe the embryo has a soul or is a person; in essence, whether it is a human being” (Stem Cell Now 127). In Brave New World, they genetically engineer children, which in some way relates to stem cells. Children are engineered to not get diseases, and if they do they are thrown into a lower caste or put into the Park Lane Hospital for the Dying.
Stem cell research has become one of the most controversial current topics of biology. This controversy comes from the idea that these stem cells are only embryonic stem cells, and the only way we get them is from the destruction of human embryos. By definition, a stem cells is an undifferentiated cell of a multicellular organism that is capable of giving rise to indefinitely more cells of the same type, and from which certain other kinds of cell arise by differentiation. Which simply means they are cells found in the human body that can create any other kind of human cell, so under further observation, stem cells could cure many diseases. Despite prior ideas, there are actually two types of stem cells, embryotic and somatic (adult) stem cells.
Stem Cell Research Stem cell research is one of the most innovative medical research with a bright future to help treat some of the debilitating diseases. However, advancement in stem cell research is still at early stage partly due to the ethical, legal and political controversies surrounding it. The ethical issues with stem cell research are multifaceted in their nature, starting with the sources of the stem cell that are used in the research to be conducted, the way the research are conducted, the trial phases, and the remedies for the consequences if anything goes wrong. One of the most debated and ethically challenged type of stem cell research is the human embryonic stem cell research.
These cells' super hero-like advances in treatments and successful procedures cannot be compared, although embryonic stem cell research and the use of human and animal embryos are becoming more legal for facilities across the United States. Constantly, many governments throughout the world are in disputes between using these embryos for research, and the controversy is: "Is it worth paying the price of a life with no opinion or defense in order to improve our generation's health and wellbeing?" While stem cells are also becoming the new controversial debate internationally, small households with loved ones suffering with rare diseases and disorders now have new conversations about how to continue living and sustaining their lives. With stem cells having the potential to solve and cure, how will citizens of the United States and other desperate countries respond in our generation and in the near future to these rapidly successful, amazing medical possibilities called stem
There are several reasons that there are not any approved treatments using embryonic stem cells. Most of the time the treatments are not successful when they are attempted, but some terrible consequences have occurred from injections of these stem cells. One report tells of a boy who had a neuromuscular disease. He had embryonic stem cells injected into his brain. Within four years he had terrible headaches which scientists now know were caused by tumors that developed from the stem cells that were injected.
Stem cell transplants can lead to improvement and potential cures for diseases. The process and long and strenuous, but if a success can lead to a new life for the patient with a disease. Works Cited 1. "Conducting Clinical Trials.
Stem Cells Stem cell research is a very controversial topic in this day in age. It has been frowned upon for the ethical, political, and moral issues. The research has many benefits that may lead to major breakthroughs in medicine. Many people are blinded by the negatives of the research and don’t try to develop an understanding of the positive effects the research may provide.
These cells are limited, they only growth into a specific type of cells, having the potential to cure just certain disease related to the part of the body where they belong, except for the one belonging to the bone marrow which can growth into a different blood cells. The Controversy The controversy about embryonic stem cells research is still active in medical and political field, this controversy is mostly based in moral and ethics principles the fact that the embryo has to be destroy to obtain embryonic stem cells is related with life termination. On other hand there are many religious and political concerns in the way life path is change by science while scientist justify these research with the opportunity to discover new medical treatments and life preservation.
What can this do for us? Cow embryonic stem cells may offer a better model for human stem cell therapies than using mice or rats. Isolating cow embryonic stem