Embryonic Research Benefits

How would you feel if you tried something new that was putting your life in danger? It’s also a fifty percent chance of you making it through the new procedure. Embryonic stem research have not a total success in this world today. First, the treatments may not even work on a person why get your hopes up high. Second, they’re doing this thing called human cloning.

People who want to protect the lives of infants say we should not practice embryonic stem research on embryos because they believe it is unethical and they care about the lives of children. Since their beliefs and values differ from those of the religious beliefs and philosophical thinkers, they tend to have different reasons, and they tend to cite different evidence in support of their claim. For example, in “embryonic stem cell debate brings politics ethics to bench” Charles Marwick argues a principal claim in stark contrast to the position held by Glick. Whereas Glick said, “embryonic stem cell is ethical,” Marwick replies, “that embryonic stem cell is unethical.” And Marwick further supports his her principal claim with reasons that reflect his values and beliefs.

For these reasons, embryonic stem cell research should be discouraged. According to the National Institutes of

"(Lee & Schmainda, 2015, para.3). This quote is misleading because it doesn't mention anything about the potency of these sources. The sources that the authors mention are all a lesser potency than fetal stem cells which would limit the number of tissues that could be created. The authors then move on to talk about "reprogrammed cells derived from adults and amniotic fluid stem cells" and that these stem cells "don't pose the risk of triggering tumor growth"(Lee & Schmainda, 2015, para.4). These induced pluripotent cells mentioned are an exciting innovation to stem cell research, but they are very expensive and time consuming to create.

Although some people may believe that embryonic stem cell research is immoral, scientists and doctors should be allowed to use them in research and medical treatments. Embryonic stem cells have garnered some controversy since the discovery of their use in medicine back in 1998. Researchers James Thomson and Jeffery Jones discovered a method to derive the first human embryonic stem cells. However, they were met with immediate backlash.

A blastocyst, which is what a five-day-old embryo is considered, is just a clump of cells that has the potential of becoming a human being but just because it has the potential does not mean that it makes it a human being or that it’s alive. If harvesting the ES cell from within a blastocyst can improve the quality of life for living human beings, and then I do not have a problem with that. The current argument is that destroying human embryos is akin to killing

Understanding how the adult stem cells are used in treatments and their successes is necessary to learning why adult stem cells are more effective than embryonic stem cells. Adult stem cells are used widely today. Bone marrow transplants are often used to treat Leukemia- a form of cancer that affects white blood cells- or to help replenish the cells of anyone who underwent chemotherapy treatment. Bone marrow transplants have been performed since the late 1960s and have a 100 day survival rate of 98 percent (Volumes and Measures). Adult stem cells can also be used to grow skin grafts for patients with life-threatening burns (What Diseases and Conditions can be Treated With Stem Cells?).

After nearly forty years Stem cell research continues to move ahead. First with mouse which started around 1981 and then human embryonic stem cells which started around 1998, and now cow stem cells. According to Kelly Servick on www.sciencemag.org it has taken decades for scientists to be able to take stem cells from calls and be able to actually keep them in a state to be used for research. We use stem cells for different studies. So not only can this discovery help researchers mimic human diseases in cows, they can also use it to try and make healthier and more productive livestock.

The Controversy of Stem Cell Research The research and harvesting of stem cells is often criticized due to the creation, usage and destruction of human embryos (Muchangi, 2014). In the 1960s, research from scientists Ernest A. McCulloch and James E. Till grew into the first findings of stem cells (Canada Science and Technology Museum, 2014). It was not until 1981 that Martin Evans officially discovered embryonic stem cells while experimenting with mice (Cardiff University, 2014).

Artificial tissues such as skin are formed using stem cells in the laboratory. As a case in point, in 1990, Gary Stakemiller, an electrician in Orlando received a skin transplant made of skin that was grown in a laboratory (Ricks). Stakemiller needed this graft because over a month earlier, he received burns on seventy five percent of his body (Ricks). The new skin was produced by using a “starter” medium which grows in a laboratory from cells into usable skin (Ricks). It takes about three weeks to grow each sheet of skin from cells, proteins, and nutrients (Ricks).

On the contrary, people do support the idea of Embryonic stem cells because they think that it will help science find new ways to make cures for different

Stem cells are expected to improve the ability of how drug companies screen side effects for new drugs. The article Accelerating Research Towards Cures describes that by using embryonic stem cells the cost to develop new medicine will decrease and it will also shorten the time that a medicine needs to be trialed. Currently, drugs go through extensive animal trials before they are given to humans. According to California’s Institute for Regenerative Medicine animal testing can take years of research and delay the drug that can possibly serve a purpose to many people. The research also isn’t foolproof because even if the drugs are safe for animals it doesn’t mean it will be the same for humans.

Destroying these embryos in research would not deprive them of a valuable future. It would be unethical, under whatever circumstances to practice wanted embryos for research. Human animal chimera, an experiment was conducted using the genetic material from human convey to an animal. In addition they argue stem cell research paid minor contemplation to the potential of the umbilical cord. The therapy point out that no medication have been yet produced.

“The main arguments against genetic modification of human embryos are that it would be unsafe and unfair, and that modification would quickly go beyond efforts to reduce the incidence of inherited maladies” (Caplan). During the altering genes in the mother 's womb cause a lot of dangerous situations and

Many people view this as destroying a potential for life to futher scientific research and knowledge. A lot of the opposition to stem cell research comes from the moral belief that human life begins at conception and some see it that destroying an embryo for medical research or even to treat another human is morally the same as killing a human child or adult for research. Many people with these views are strongly religious Roman Catholics or Orthodox