An examination of new and emerging theoretical frameworks serves to reorganize and reexamine prior experiences and thinking about teaching and learning. The emphasis from teacher-directed activities to a focus on learner-centered behaviors is creating a major transformation in the evolutionary cycle of new and emerging trends in teaching theories and practices. Learners are viewed as active constructors, rather than passive recipients of knowledge (Phillips, 1995; Prawatt & Floden, 1994; Cobb, 1995). In addition, there are other important forces that are driving these new trends in teaching and learning within today's educational profession. Some of the new and emerging educational theories and practices have their roots in research, conducted …show more content…
A constructivist view uses the learner's experiences and personal framework, such as memories, associations, feelings, sounds, experiences, rules acquired, and information collected, to help students learn how to actively apply knowledge, solve problems, and promote conceptual understanding. In the process, students can examine in more detail any incoherent or poorly formed concepts and beliefs and adjust them towards more refined and rigorously examined thinking. Teachers using constructivist approaches tend to challenge students with classroom projects and products that allow them to major (Brown, 1994) in areas of their own interests within a topic of study. Teachers also tend to present information across Gardner's multiple intelligence, so that the student's learning styles are consistently optimized. Closely related to a constructivist approach to teaching and learning is the importance of the social environment, peer interaction, and the learning from and with others. The constructivist philosophy to teaching and learning have literally paved the road for the popularity of social learning theories and the application of such practices in learning …show more content…
The zone of proximal development is the gap between what the learner has already mastered (the actual level of development) and what he or she can achieve when provided with educational support. This theory opposes the use of standardized tests as a means of to measure student intelligence. In a classroom setting, the teacher is responsible for structuring interactions and developing instruction in small steps based on tasks the learner is already capable of performing independently – an instructional strategy known as scaffolding. The instruction is also charged with providing support until the learner can move through all tasks independently. These tasks are built by the teachers to develop the learner’s zones of proximal development. (K-12 Teaching and Learning from the UNC School of Education)
Experiential Learning. Experiential learning theories situate experience at the core of the learning process. They aim to understand the manners in which experiences motivate learners and promote their learning. Experiential learning posits that learning is about meaningful experiences that lead to a change in an individual’s knowledge and behaviors. It is self-initiated learning as people have a natural inclination to learn and that they learn best when they are fully involved in the learning process. Carl Rogers, the proponent of these theories, mentioned that learning can only be facilitated and is most likely to occur and to last when it is self-initiated.
The social learning theory is “a social learning
Children are individual and unique this approach considers the individual child to allow them to enjoy their learning. Development Appropriate Practice creates effective
Piaget believed that children take an active role in their learning process and develop through making their own experiments, observations, and learning about the world. (https://www.verywell.com/piagets-stages-of-cognitive-development-2795457) Piaget's four stages of intellectual (or cognitive) development
It highlights the difference between a child’s level of performance, and their potential level of performance. Within the zone of proximal development are the upper and lower boundaries. The lower boundary is what a child can achieve in problem-solving tasks without any guidance, while the upper boundary is what a child can achieve in problem-solving tasks with assistance. Tasks higher than the upper boundary are things a child will not yet be able to complete, even with guidance, as it is simply too difficult for them.
Thesis Proposal Title: Rehabilitation of the Older Igbo Persons in the Evolving Nigerian Socio- Cultural Context: A constructivist Grounded Theory study. Provide an abstract which briefly states the following: the problem/gap in current knowledge rationale study aim study design participants study outcomes and impact
The Zone of proximal theory explains the teacher’s action during my observation. The teacher helped the child to complete the last stage of the puzzle after the child could not complete the last stage of the puzzle. Vygotsky argued that the zone is constantly changing while Piaget argued that learning is limited by the stage or maturation, but Vygotsky disagreed with this view, he argued that learning is not limited by the stage or maturation. What I have learned from this observation and using this theory to explain my observation is that children thrive in an environment that is predictable and nurturing; therefore, it is important for care givers to be trusting, dependable.
The Shaman approach to education allows educators to self-reflect to understand the deficiencies of the school curriculum and develop mechanisms for improving the outcomes of the learning process. Constructivism, on the other hand, is an educational and learning theory in which meaning making is a central result of education. It promotes personal understanding and knowledge creation. As such, a constructivist approach contends that objects and events have no absolute meaning; rather individuals interpret objects and events differently and create meaning based on personal cultural, social, and political contexts. Thus, the concept of learning as a social process and the constructivist approach would provide students with different points of view on a given topic that would make it easy for them to understand difficult topics.
Constructivism Constructivism as a prototype posits that learning is an active constructive process.
Social constructivists believe that students learn by connecting new information two what they already know and then learning takes place when what they already know is integrated with new information (McLaughlin,
Researcher position: Epistemology: Constructivist epistemology will underpin this study, Crotty (1998) states that meaning is constructed out of various phenomena resulting from interaction with life experiences. Since meaning has to be constructed, the proposed study will be premised on an interpretivist approach grounded by the symbolic interactionism perspective. Symbolic interactionism gives emphasis to the social interaction process as a means by which meaning and interpretation is made, For us to understand the behavior of people, symbolic interactionism becomes vital especially that it lays emphasis on the people interpret word and give meaning to symbols ( Denzin,1998;Patton,2002).Since human beings react towards things based on the
Methodology This study employed the mixed-method research approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative research designs. Results from this study can be used to generalize the population from which the sample is taken. The data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively for deeper interpretations such as understanding deviations in the gathered figures and evaluating the personal insights of the respondents. This research paper will investigate the reasons for teenagers’ conformity to peers and the positive and negative effects of peer pressure towards other teens.
Learning Theory and The Role It Plays in Education Introduction Learning theories are used every day in classrooms all over America, educational theorist Lev Vygotsky, Jean Piaget, Benjamin Bloom and Jerome Bruner introduced constructivism and social constructivism theories (cognitive development, social development, and developmental). The theories developed by Vygotsky, Piaget, Bloom, and Bruner share similarities and differences, and throughout the years have been compared for educational discoveries. Learning theories are extremely important for educators, because learning is an active process. Theorist/Theory #1 Lev Vygotsky and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZDP), is the belief that students learn from adults who are more advanced
Vygotsky mentioned that the “gap” between what learners can do easily and what learners can do with the help of a more knowledgeable other based on his concept of Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Thus, the most effective learning takes place when the task given to the learners is a level higher than the learners’ actual knowledge (i+1). Knowledge is best transferred when the teacher co-operates and discuss with the learners. The importance of scaffolding is its contribution to the teacher-learning relationship. It focuses on the role of teacher and learners which are distinct but complementary in the learning context (Gibbons, 2002).
Theme B: Review on the Impact of Social Constructivism for Pre-school Education. Early childhood education generally means an education before the child start of formal schooling or before the age they required to attend the school. It is crucial stage of life in development the physical, intellectual, emotional and social lifestyle of the children. For the basic education method the approach must base on their prior knowledge and practice is called “constructivism”. Social constructivism is the one of the theories of learning and pedagogy that had the utmost impact on tutoring and curriculum design because they seem to be the most conducive to integration into current educational approaches.
Following evaluation of my personal teaching techniques, coupled with structured colleague classroom critical observations, I was in a position to identify instructional and questioning practices in my initial teaching methodology, which had acted contrary to my stated curricular stance. As a direct response, when I critically addressed these practices, I was in a position to adjust and fine-tune some of my teaching techniques, and this led to an approach more closely aligned to a Constructivist and Process framed curricular rationale, and therefore led to an improvement in the effectiveness of student learning in my classes. While this paper has explored this journey of discovery, I am fully cognisant that there are many other areas where my teaching can improve in order to fully achieve the benefits of teaching in a Process framed Constructivist style. It is my firm intention to continually develop my pedagogical knowledge, especially as it relates and conforms to my preferred curricular stance, so as to further enhance my skills and technique