Comparing Durkheim's Functionalist Theory To The Conflict Theory

This, to Durkheim, is why mechanical solidarity is a defining characteristic of traditional. Mechanical solidarity takes a large basis in emotion, which can lead to an irrational response. For these reasons does Durkheim believe modern societies are properly characterized by organic solidarity being the basis of social

The first prevails to the extent that "ideas and tendencies common to all members of the society are greater in number and intensity than those which pertain personally to each member. This solidarity can grow only in inverse ration to personality." In other words, mechanical solidarity prevails where individual differences are minimized and the members of society are much alike in their devotion to the common weal. "Solidarity which comes from likeness is at its maximum when the collective conscience completely envelops our whole conscience and coincides in all points with it." Organic solidarity, in contrast, develops out of differences, rather than likenesses, between individuals.

Mechanical solidarity refers to a type of social consensus where individuals in a society share the same or similar beliefs and values. Mechanical solidarity is most common is traditional societies that lead a more simple way of life like living on farms for example. Contrary, the other form of social consensus that Emile Durkheim suggested is organic solidarity. Organic solidarity is a form of social consensus in societies, in which individuals are independent and different individuals in that society may hold different beliefs and values. Because of this, organic solidarity is most common in larger, modernised and industrialised societies.

Marxism Vs Functionalism Inroduction: This essay will discuss the Marxist and Functionalist approaches to education. The essay will likewise examine the two main concepts of sociology and the education system. The way in which Marxists and Functionalists compare education is important within society. The structure and processes of education systems are related to the general process of socialization (Markedbyteachers, 2014). Socialization is how an individual participates in society.

This essay will respectively explain about the religion and belief system which significally influenced by the sociologist ideas. The sociologist that invovle in this theory of religion consist of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber that was one of the famous sociologist with their power theory at that time. Other than that, I will also explain about their similarities and differences among their theories about religion and belief system. All of us know that these sociologist was greatly interested to make their own theory especially on religion and belief system. They each comes out their ideas about religion in many different ways of perspective, method, languange, and resulting theory.

Emile Durkheim, a French sociologist wrote on Suicide in 1897, a work appreciated and created in the field of sociology. His work during that time revealed what the sociological monograph must look like hence, making a unique publication in the field of this social science. Among Protestants and Catholics, Durkheim explored the different suicide rates arguing that a stronger social control results in a lower suicide rate. His further studies claim that suicide rates were higher among men than women, higher among the people who are single than being married, lower among people who have children than the ones who do not and much higher among soldiers than civilians. (soc) Emile Durkheim was a contemporary of Weber, and his lifetime overlapped

INTRODUCTION: Durkheim, Marx and Weber are the most important early Western sociologists to understand sociology as a discipline. Emile Durkheim was a functionalist as he believed that the existence of the individuals and the institutions of which the individuals are a part of, function to maintain social integration and social stability. So, society for Durkheim is “sui generis” as it is independent of the individuals who make it up. Marx and Weber on the other hand were conflict theorists as they considered the conflict between the individuals and among the groups was an important attribute of each and every society. Marx had his approach based on economic influence on society that leads to problems in the social institutions.

Durkheim believed that in modern societies, traditional norms became undermined without being replaced. This undermining created no clear guidelines to influence societal behaviour, and he referred to this as a state of Anomie. He developed this theory through his study of suicide (Giddens, 2009, p.941). Durkheim was interested in the way that societies function as a whole and how this contributed to the continued success of a society (Lausten, Larsen, Nielsen, Ravn and Sørenson, 2017 p. 36). Durkheim worked to record both moral and social requirements for societal consistency in modern and traditional societies in order to advance a theory about society as a combined reality.

INTRODUCTION Sociology as it is known today would not have been the same without the intervention of Emile Durkheim (1858–1917). Durkheim is widely recognised as one of the founding fathers of sociology and for good reason: he successfully brought drastic changes in the way social scientists considered the associations between individuals and society. Durkheim rejected biological and psychological explanations of the human behaviour and therefore focused his attention on how mankind’s social problems could be determined by social structure. Excelling in his discipline, Emile Durkheim had a visionary insight on various domains such as the sociology of knowledge, ethics, social stratification, theology, legislation, pedagogy, and deviance. Accomplishments in these domains can be found in previous theorists.

However, the cause of social cohesion is often debated, whether it be materialist, or idealist approach. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber each gave many contributions to the disciplines of anthropology and sociology, but their contributions each have weakness that our society can now analyse and understand.