Sruly Brach
Mr Semach P. 4
10/22/14
What is the third Estate? The Third Estate by Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès is a pamphlet written pre-French Revolutionary war about the importance, yet no appreciation of the Third Estate. In the first section of his essay I will discuss the three causes of the French Revolution: The financial crisis, the lack of nationalism, and the misrepresentation. In the second section of this essay I will discuss three topics about Sieyès: his background, his relationship to the third estate and his role in the mid and post revolution government. In the final section of this essay I will discuss the development of the French Revolution. These three sections will provide information to better understand the pamphlet written by Sieyès and the revolution in general.
…show more content…
France has just gotten out of both the 7 Year War and The American Revolution. On top of that no one was stopping the kings and the nobility to spend any amount of France’s resources for things that were not necessities, for example the palace Versailles was estimated to cost 10% of the national wealth. This led to a slowdown in population growth and less goods being imported to France. Furthermore there was little to no tax payed by most of the 1st and 2nd class because of privileges, so the main taxpayers where the poor and how much can the poor be taxed? With the cost of two wars, a corrupt government and a depletion of funds, it was obvious France was in a moajr Financial crisis and its also obviosus that that is one of the things that has led to the French
Question #5 The French Revolution was an influential part of history that was inspired by liberal and radical ideas. The Revolution was known to be the Revolution that upset the course of history. The result of the French Revolution was the decline of the theocracies and also absolute monarchies. Instead of having theocracies and absolute monarchies they had republics and democracies.
One of the causes of the French Revolution was a lack of guidance. Document three shows how people thought the king should be forced to reform the abuses and tyranny of letter de cachet. It also says how every tax should be granted for a limited time. The picture in document seven shows how the government wasn’t keeping people in order and the 1st and 2nd estates were
The three estates system was used to rule France in the eighteenth century. Each estate was composed of the clergy, nobles, and commoners respectively. However, this system of governance allowed the first and second estates, which comprised only 10% of the population, to outvote the third estate, which was made up of 90% of the people. By questioning the fairness of the system, the third estate was able to revolutionize and abolish the unfair system. Without the questioning of the decisions and ideas of the second and first estate, the third estate would’ve continued to be taken advantage of.
Like it can be seen in the cartoon in document 2, the people in the Third Estate were burdened by the privileges of the First and Second Estate. For example, members of the Third Estate had to pay many taxes and fees and had no privileges or exemptions unlike people in the other estates. As a result, it difficult for the Third Estate to have any power or voice in their society because they had to pay taxes that were controlled by people from a higher estate and they had the power to “..exempt, change, add, or diminish [the taxes] at pleasure.” (Document 1). As a result of the injustices many people in the Third Estate had to deal with they decided to rebel and demand their
I say this because over time the French started losing money because of the revolt and the european war. Which lead to their downfall and the loss of their
This document review describes and compares three documents written by the rulers of three European nations: Louis XIV, the king of France; Frederick William, the Great Elector of Brandenburg-Prussia; and Peter the Great, the emperor of Russia. Through these documents, we are able to see what was most important to these monarchs, and what they considered best for themselves and their countries. Although textbooks are useful for reading descriptions of historical people and events, through reading documents such as these, we are able to see not only what these rulers did, but also their motives and their rationalizations of their decisions. In “Louis XIV Revokes the Edict of Nantes”, written in 1685, Louis XIV explains that the Huguenots,
P1)One major cause of the revoultion was poor leadership from King Louis XVI. He burdened the lower class with unreasonably high taxes, in which they could not pay. Additionly, Him and his ife spent large sums of money on luxeries which caused France have a large amount of debt. Even though the King saw this problem, he put in very minimal efforts to mend it.
The French aristocracy was very well known for being extremely corrupted. The King could do whatever he wanted—he had all the say, essentially. Aristocrats and nobles could spend money the government didn’t have on lavish clothing, jewelry, parties, etc. Marie Antoinette, the last queen of France and the wife of King Louis XV, was called Madame Déficit for this very reason. France plummeted into debt
In your unit study, you explored the causes and effects, characteristics, as well as the consequences, of each of these revolutions. What did they have in common? How did they differ? For this portfolio, you will complete this document as you explore the similarities and differences between the French and American Revolutions.
In this paper I discuss the four phases of the French revolution and how they influenced one and other, these phases consist of The National assembly/ The Constitutional Monarchy, The Reign of Terror, The Directory, and the Age of Napoleon. The First phase of the French revolution is the National assembly or Constitutional Monarchy. " Constitutional monarchy, system of government in which a monarch shares power with a constitutionally organized government.
The French government system wasn’t the best for the French citizens, the economic and political issues made the country more divided. The French government did absolutely nothing to help their people, they didn’t realize that the whole country would be affected by their actions. The crisis France had faced could have been prevented, only if the government gave the necessary help and the rights
“Qu 'est-ce que le tiers état”/ “What Is the Third Estate” by Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes was one of the French Revolution’s most momentous and prominent political texts, shaping the course of events in 1789. It is a pamphlet structured around three hypothetical questions and Sieyes responses. These questions are: What is the third estate? Everything.
This essay will examine the historical accuracy of the film Les Miserables in terms of the social, economic and political conditions in French society post French Revolution. The film Les Miserables depicts an extremely interesting time in French history (from about 1815-1832.) Even though the story line does not depict every detail and event that occurred during the time period as well as the fact that some aspects are dramatized for entertainment purposes, the film effectively spans thirty years of economic, political and social aspects of French Society. However it also manages to bring in references to the past, the French Revolution (1789-1799) and the impact it had on the society portrayed in the film.
Question: In what sense was the French Revolution not all that revolutionary? Give at least one example of how its events did not bring about lasting change in France. In what way (or ways) was it truly revolutionary? Give at least one example of how it had long-lasting effects.
The philosophies of the French Revolution changed quickly, going through various enlightenment philosophers, each with slightly different ideals. The Revolution started with the idea that France’s government should be more like England’s after the Magna Carta, giving more power to the nobles and less