Most employees experience stress as a usual or normal part of their jobs. However, some individuals experience stress more strongly than others, to a point where they may need time off from work. The area of occupational stress has rapidly grown over the last two decades, to the extent that there are now two international journals devoted entirely to its study (Spector & Goh, 2001). The incidence of occupational stress in India has steadily increased over the past decade with ComCare reporting psychological injury as a key contributor to the increase in premiums in 2003/04.
Although EI has become a popular tool in organizations, there still remains a need for increased empirical research on the construct (Salovey, Woolery, & Mayer, 2002). This
…show more content…
Emotional Intelligence
There are various different arguments about the definition of Emotional Intelligence. One attempt toward a definition was made by Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer (1990) who defined EI (Emotional Intelligence) as “the ability to monitor one's own and others' feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide one's thinking and actions.”
Despite this early definition, there has been uncertainty regarding the exact meaning of this construct. The definitions are so varied, and the field is growing so rapidly, that researchers are constantly revising even their own definitions of the construct. Main models of EI:
The ability-based model of emotional intelligence describes four separate but interrelated abilities. These are the ability to perceive emotions, use emotions, understand emotions, and manage emotions.
The trait model proposes that people have a number of emotional self-perceptions and emotional traits that form their
…show more content…
An "engaged employee" is one who is fully absorbed by and enthusiastic about their work and so takes positive action to further the organization's reputation and interests. An organization with 'high' employee engagement might therefore be expected to outperform those with 'low' employee engagement, all else being equal. There are, however, a range of definitions that have emerged around concepts relating to employee engagement. William Kahn provided the first formal definition of personal engagement as "the harnessing of organization members' selves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally during role performances." In 1993, Schmidt et al. proposed a bridge between the pre-existing concept of 'job satisfaction' and employee engagement with the definition: "an employee's involvement with, commitment to, and satisfaction with work. Employee engagement is a part of employee retention." This definition integrates the classic constructs of job satisfaction (Smith et al., 1969), and organizational commitment (Meyer & Allen,
According to Caruso et al. ’s “Special Issue on Emotional Intelligence,” EI is the capability to distinguish another’s emotions and react to them effectively (2016). When Testikov abruptly throws Elaine’s electronic organizer out of the limousine window, she is calm under pressure, showing that she possesses high emotional intelligence (EI). Therefore, instead of reacting to the aggressive action with more aggression, she develops a plan to repay the innocent victim for her incidental medical expenses.
Purpose-driven Employee Engagement: A KPMG Case Study According to a Calling Brands survey, working with an organization having a well-defined purpose is more important to employees than its work culture, the scope of promotion, and job responsibilities. In other words, this factor is the second most important factor following pay and benefits. Another study by Net Impact shows that about half of the modern workforce would prefer 15% pay cut for working with an organization driven by an inspiring purpose.
Aside from an increase on health care expenditures used up by employees because of stress, disengagement is costly because disengaged workers had 37% higher absenteeism, 49% more accidents, and 60% more errors and defects. In organizations with low employee engagement scores, they experienced 18% lower productivity, 16% lower profitability, 37% lower job growth, and 65% lower share price over time. Importantly, businesses with highly engaged employees enjoyed 100% more job applications. Happy people are more satisfied with their jobs and report having greater autonomy in their duties (Boehm & Lyubomirsky,
Abstract Employee engagement is a huge umbrella covering every aspect of human resource management facets. It is vital to address every facet of HR, failing to which may result in mismanagement employee dissatisfaction & employee disengagement. Employee engagement is all about retaining the employees in the organization by adopting certain strategies resulting in job satisfaction, employee commitment and Organizational citizenship behavior. Employee engagement have broader scope, it defines a two way relationship between employer & employee. Better the employee engagement activities & strategies adopted by the organization more emotionally attached are the employees to their organization, resulting into high involvement in the job with greater
This might be a sign of lacking awareness of problem. Emotional intelligence refers to a person’s abilities to perceive, identify, understand, and successfully manage emotions in self and others. Being emotionally intelligent means being able to effectively manage ourself and our relationships. A leader need a high degree of emotional intelligence to regulate their emotions and motivate others.
I have a better understanding of it and I feel that my results were on pair with what I thought. “Emotional intelligence (EQ) refers to the array of personal-management and social skills that allows one to succeed in the workplace an in life in general” (Sterrett, E. A. (2000). Manager's Pocket Guide to Emotional Intelligence: From Management to Leadership). I think that the definition of EQ is how I see
Ability models view emotional intelligence as absolute type of mental ability and therefore as a pure intelligence. On the other hand, mixed models of emotional intelligence merge mental ability along with personality traits. The ability model is proposed by John Mayer and Peter Salovey which emphasizes that emotional intelligence is a cognitive skill. Bar-On model on emotional intelligence emphasize as mixed ability model of both cognitive skills and personality traits.
Appraisal and expression of emotions. The first factor of EI is the ability to properly determine and express one’s own emotions as well as to be sympathetic, appraise and express emotions of others. Every individual’s ability varies in precisely identifying, appraising and expressing his own emotions as well as the emotions experienced by others. Some people are attentive of their feelings they experience and can express their emotions whereas, some people cannot express their feelings and emotions or they are unaware of their emotions (Zhou, George, 2003).
In extreme cases, long-term stress or traumatic events at work may lead to psychological problems and be conducive to psychiatric disorders resulting in absence from work and preventing the worker from being able to work again Some people who experience stress may engage in unhealthy practices such as; smoking, excessive drinking, poor diet and little exercise. They may become distressed, irritable, enjoy their work less, and feel less committed to work, have difficulty thinking logically or making decisions. Generally we view stress as having either psychological and/or physiological reactions that affect health. (Doddy & lyons,
Employee engagement is a role the employees play in creating a resilient environment for the organization. Employee engagement means that workers are committed to their jobs and switched on at work. This role consists of Career contentment- employees are content with what they are doing, Feasible management- workers display leadership qualities and become more innovative. This encourages resilience as employees are problem solvers and more innovative. " Tesla encourages employee engagement by creating a dashboard that conveys results from a valuable anonymous internal survey that let workers share reviews and concerns to better understand employees.
Employee engagement is a workplace approach resulting in the right conditions for all members of an organisation to give of their best each day, committed to their organisation’s goals and values, motivated to contribute to organisational success, with an enhanced sense of their own well-being. Employee engagement is based on trust, integrity, two way commitment and communication between an organisation and its members. It is an approach that increases the chances of business success, contributing to organisational and individual performance, productivity and well-being. It can be measured. It varies from poor to great.
Moreover, both job satisfaction and employee engagement are playing a significant role through accomplishing the organizational goals and objectives effectively and efficiency. Job satisfaction is important in the organizational settings, because according to Robbins and judge in 2013, first of all, job satisfaction affects productivity because several studies have stated that, the more employees are satisfied and happy, they more likely to have more products. Secondly, job satisfaction influences absenteeism, there is a negative relationship among job satisfaction absenteeism because satisfied employees are less likely to miss work. In the third place, job satisfaction again plays an essential role through the decisions of staying or leaving of the workers within the organization which is called turnover .in the fourth stage, job satisfaction is the main consideration of an employee 's organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), also the employees who are more satisfied are more likely to involve in OCBs, and talk more positively about the firm.
Besides, it has been defined in ways that overlap with other organizational behavior constructs such as organizational commitment, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (Saks 2006). Engagement involves the use of cognitive, emotional and behavioral energies at workplace while working in coherence with the organization’s objectives and strategies (Andrew & Sofian, 2011). Kahn was the first to define engagement in light of employees’ psychological presence while performing an organizational role. Researches show that there is a connection between engaged employees and business performance (Harter et al., 2002).Engaged employees display greater organizational commitment and low tendency to leave the organization (Schaufeli and Bakker
Therefore, a person that is capable of properly regulating his/her own emotions has the possibility of developing emotional competence through self-discipline. Similarly, a person who can correctly identify his/her own emotions has the possibility of developing an emotional competence in empathy or conflict management. In both cases, it is clear that the factors of emotional intelligence offer the foundations for developing emotional competence. Wakeman (2006) claims that the level of a person’s emotional intelligence can be evaluated in a certain degree by assessing the emotional competences developed in that person, which is quite an interesting approach to this matter. In this view, emotional competences are regarded as a result of several factors, including emotional