Social Injustice Rhetorical Analysis

814 Words4 Pages
Staying silent about global injustice issues does not benefit anyone. One cannot expect to make a difference in the world by simply stating their opinion and continuing their day-to-day schedule. Although it is crucial to exhibit one’s feelings, one cannot change the world by making statements or posing threats against the tormentors. Humanity needs to feel the agonizing pain of every person’s death, no matter which ethnicity, social, or religious group they belong to. A Christian must stand up for a Muslim. A rich person must stand up for a poor person. A white person must stand up for a black person; that is how humanity can make a difference in social justice issues. People need to form opinions and plans to change the issues surrounding…show more content…
For instance, Donne states, “Any man 's death diminishes [him], because [he is] involved in mankind” (4-5). By putting oneself in the shoes of the victim, one can realize their needs and try to bring positivity into their lives. In addition, feelings of empathy can lead to picking the most appropriate side in regards to social injustice. Likewise, Wiesel demonstrates his method for resolving these issues by believing, “[one] must take sides [and that] neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim” (Wiesel 1). Wiesel utilizes logos to highlight the value of taking the most suitable stance without being diplomatic. By picking the most valid side, one can inspire others to be as courageous and create a safe society. Furthermore, choosing a side can lead to one taking action against inequality. However, the most valid act of justice can take more than one human being to accomplish. Similarly, Rusesabagina expresses an alternate way to handle social injustice: letting powerful beings help. Rusesabagina says, “Many of you know influential people abroad, you must call these people” (Hotel Rwanda). Rusesabagina uses logos to focus on the cruciality of resources and alliances with…show more content…
The concerned citizens avoid bringing these issues to the attention of the general public, due to the inappropriate feedback they might receive. Although Wiesel suggests to “pick sides” (Wiesel, 1), everyone has a different preconception of who the victim is. For example, many ethnocentric people create stereotypes about First Nations, but that does not guarantee the validity of their statements. Everyone has diverse opinions about life, religion, and inequality issues. By posing negative opinions, one is increasing the probability of hate and threats against a certain group, such as the First Nations. Before one commits to a “process of reconciliation” (pg 6), one must be certain that their actions will create a valuable change in the world. An act that seems beneficial to one, might be damaging to another. Therefore, mankind needs to have opinions about social inequality which create a healthy and prosperous society. Hence, not only does mankind need to consider making a difference but they also need to make sure that they are making a favourable

More about Social Injustice Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document