The state government's approach on Australia’s energy policy has provoked much debate in recent media. The Australian opinion piece, titled ‘Energy policy has become a racket and the madness must stop’ (November 7, 2016) was written by an Australian economist, Judith Sloan, in response to this debate. Sloan presents a mocking and skeptical tone where she argues that ‘it’s time for the federal government to intervene to stop this madness’. She attacks the Australian state governments by portraying its management techniques which are contrary to her ideals as foolish, uncaring and deceitful. This creates distrust of this section of the government in the audience and further supports her view by using evidence and appeals to hip pocket nerve to gain approval of ‘the Australian taxpayer’. Additionally she uses humour and colloquial language to invite Australians to feel like they are on the same …show more content…
Sloan sets her readers up to agree in the first place by attacking the government which implies its incompetence then appeals to common sense by stating anyone who disagrees lacks intelligence. She firstly attacks the government to help her persuade the Australian taxpayer that she is right. The opposing view is the government thinking that the energy policy is good so if she makes them seem discreditable by saying, for example ‘the French government, has hoovered up more than $500 million in Australian government funding and free carbon permits’, then Sloan is telling her audience that the government is wasteful with their money and is handing it over to other countries. The idiomatic use of ‘hoovered up’ has connotations to taking things avidly or being greedy, this appeals to an Australian's sense of patriotism because they don’t want money going to France because then it won’t benefit the nation. ‘more than $5.5 billion was budgeted to be paid as “compensation and concessional loans to the coal-fired generation sector.”’ Sloan is mocking the government
The article “The Liberals’ taxing policies: What they will mean to you and when” by Jamie Golombek, basically summarizes some aspects of the taxing policies campaigned by the liberals in the 2015 election. This article talks about how the liberal party, if elected, plan to cut the tax rate for the middle income tax bracket best known as the middle class. The party plans to cut the tax rate from the current 22% to 20.5% for Canadians with taxable annual income between $44 700- $89 400.To make of for this middle class tax cut, the party also plans to increse the tax rate from 29% to 33% for the wealthiest one percent of Canada who have an anual income of over $200 00. The liberal party also intends to cancel income splitting due to how it does
In Fahrenheit 451, a vast percentage of the populace are under a misguided feeling of bliss, in light of the fact that they are oblivious to events outside of their groups, homes, and parlor walls. For example, Mildred was so unengaged while tuning into her seashells that she, “took all the pills in [her] bottle last night” (Bradbury 23). This brought about her overdosing on sleeping pills, and helps further the point that citizens are extremely disconnected while engaged in their “parlors” or while listening to their “seashells”. Furthermore, Beatty discloses to Montag that, “If the government is top heavy, and tax-mad, better it be all those than that people worry over” (Bradbury 64). Beatty is explaining to Montag that if the government
CHEATING AT CRICKET- RESPONSE Following the ball-tampering debacle with the Australian men’s cricket team in South Africa; The Age Newspaper’s economics editor, Ross Gittins explores the issue in his opinion article, “Cheating at cricket just one of the unthinkable things Aussies do now” (27 march 2018). Gittins contends that Australia’s ball tampering incident is only one of the issues facing the nation and there are more pressing issues. The author addresses his audience of the Australian public in a concerned, critical and ashamed tone.
In Robert Bryce’s article “The Dangerous Delusions of Energy Independence” he explains the depths of America’s delusional perception of energy independence and asserts his evident disapproval of the subject. He begins by mentioning past presidents and their verbal concerns of an upcoming energy crisis leading into the similar views held by America’s majority. The fact that energy independence will make America self-sufficient, create new jobs, keep U.S. soldiers out of the Persian Gulf, and result in a thriving economy has become a generally accepted attitude. Bryce claims that this attitude has escalated since the attacks of September 11th due to the numerous news stories proposing that “buying oil from the countries of the Persian Gulf
Hi, Anna I’m really happy that you had a once of a life time chance to go on tour with Rihanna as her makeup artist. But, since you had to drop out of English 1302 I remembered you made me promise to keep you up to date with what we are learning. With never wanting to break a promise, I’m deciding to write to you today to teach you about a new subject we are learning. This subject is about how to analyze an argument and, I going to be using Charles Schwertner editorial called “Tuition Deregulation is Falling Texas Students”. Schwertner published this article in December 7, 2014 on TribTalk.org in order to reach out to students, business man, and the general people of Texas.
Speeches made within the past are still relevant to today’s society as the issues they have faced are significant to the values of the present. The statement: "Any significant and valued speech is able to transcend its immediate context", is exemplified within Paul Keating 's Redfern Address (1992) and Noel Pearson 's An Australian History for Us All (1996). Within these speeches, the themes of taking responsibility for actions and the importance of reconciliation resonate as they have influenced change in present-day Australia through new laws and forming the basis of Australian society. Conducted in a predominantly Aboriginal community, the former Prime Minister of Australia, Paul Keating addresses a controversial topic in celebration of
RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS CAT THE BRINGING THEM HOME REPORT WAS A SIGNIFICANT EVENT FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PEOPLES. The ‘Bringing Them Home Report’ was a significant event for the civil rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, as what they experienced between 1910 to 1970 was something no human being should have to go through, The Stolen Generations suffered a great deal of traumatic experiences. On 11 of May 1995 change, had to take place as this wasn’t a lifestyle a human being should live, the inquiry period began for The Bringing Them Home Report.
A New York Times article examines the changing of EPA regulations regarding toxic chemicals. Despite scientists warning that certain chemicals cause birth defects, cancer, and other health issues, the EPA has made it harder to evaluate the effects of these chemicals and thus regulate them. The deregulation has been spearheaded by a representative of the chemical industry, who now holds a high position in the EPA. The decision to deregulate chemicals that pose a danger to the public is a prime example of the trend that government increasingly caters to powerful interests.
An expository text written by Mike Steketee, a former columnist well known for his affairs and articles concerning the political aspects and happening in Australian society. One of many opinionative texts by Mike, this one aimed at the large majority who “don’t know” as Mike states, which political candidate to vote for. A number of techniques can be found in the beginnings of the text, especially the title. The title that author Mike Steketee chose to publish, headlined “Trust me, we find it very hard to believe our leaders”; Obviously common knowledge that might derive from the article if one were to read, is that this text is more-or-less subjected to the majority of Australians who are permitted to vote, or are deemed old enough due to
On the day of August 10, 1874, Herbert Hoover was born in West Branch, Iowa. As Hoover was advancing in age, he worked excessively hard to become involved in the political world. As an American politician, Hoover contributed to the negative impact in the background of America. Herbert Hoover was primarily recognized for serving one term during 1929 until 1933 of the thirty-first president for the United States. This president is considered significant in American history, as citizens of the U.S concluded that Hoover triggered the commencement of The Great Depression.
Described as “Australia’s Martin Luther King moment” Stan Grant as part of the IQ2 debate series attempted to confirm the legitimacy of that “Racism is destroying the Australian Dream”. Grant pronounced that racism was not only eroding the Australian dream, but lay at its very foundation. Beginning his speech, Grant references the recent controversy involving former AFL player Adam Goodes and the racist butchery which lead to his eventual retirement. Grant talks inclusively about the incident inciting that "When we heard those boos, we heard a sound that was very familiar to us ...
The issue of not changing Australia day can be very sensitive to indigenous people The date suggestion of moving Australia day to another date is 1st of January, 25th of April (Anzac day) or the 1st of September (wattle day). The solution that Smith proposed was January 26th is a date that’s orientated towards when we gained our independence from British rule or perhaps a date bases on when Mathew Flinders when he first used the word ‘Australia’. The intended audience of this article is everyday Australian multi-cultural Australians. Smith focuses most of his attention trying to persuade people to change 26th of January (Australia day) to change it to First Fleet Day instead.
Democratic Perspectives What do you think about democracy? Authors Sara Holbrook and Reginald Rose of “Democracy” and 12 Angry Men, both share their own opinion on this topic. This essay will be comparing and contrasting their two opinions based on evidence from their texts. Rose and Holbrook both express their opinion on democracy and how it affects their lives in different ways.
The push for aboriginal rights in the 50s and 60s was an ongoing problem. This caused major riots and other boycotts. The start of the riots was Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat in order for a white person to sit down. Aboriginals were always second class and didn’t have the same rights as white people. This included not being able to drink from the same public water taps, swim in the same public pools and go to the same schools as well as other significant rules that isolated the aboriginals from the white people.
English Essay – Australia – Caitlin Tompkins A.D. Hope was one of the most influential and recognised Australian poets of the twentieth century and his poem, ‘Australia’, is considered one of his greatest works. In this poem, Hope compares society’s view of the barren land of Australia to his and describes how the opinions differ immensely. In ‘Australia’, it appears that Hope represents Australia and Australians very negatively although it is quite the opposite as he explains that despite the flaws, he still calls Australia home. Hope creates this representation by using many poetic devices to present the comparison of the two opinions.