Enforcing lifestyle clauses has been one of the most controversial issues in The US for a long time. Some people claim that American contract law is built on freedom of contract which means these lifestyle clauses must be enforceable as long as these clauses were voluntarily made by the couples and these clauses were consistent with the laws. However, others allege that compelling people to carry out what these prenuptial clauses state could lead these people to lose their freedoms especially when we know that some clauses may preclude them from having a normal life such as asking him or her to stay home all the time. I strongly believe that although American contract law gives people the freedom of contract, only the reasonable lifestyle clauses should be enforceable.
The freedom of contract granted by the American contract law is the argument many people use to support the idea of making prenuptial agreements enforceable even if these prenuptial agreements contain bizarre lifestyle clauses. For instance, asking a party to pay a huge amount of money or losing his or her
…show more content…
Sensible lifestyle clauses include all lifestyle clauses that do not make couples change some aspects of their own lives beyond their abilities such as losing more than 20 pounds or gaining more than 10 pounds. In addition to these lifestyle clauses, unreasonable lifestyle clauses should be invalidated such as how much sex couples will have during their marriage or how much time they should sleep. It is really complicated to decide the standard which should be used to determine whether a lifestyle clause should be considered as a reasonable clause or not. However, I believe that our common sense would work well as a standard for our
“You want the messey agreement, you do know what that means”. The movie Intolerable Cruelty brings to light the messay agreement which is a prenuptial agreement which cannot be broken, it is said to be “ironclad”. In this prenuptial agreement whatever possessions that the couple bring into the marriage, will be return to them if the marriage is dissolved. Also, any earnings made during the marriage will be given to the person who earned it. No one can profit from the marriage.
Instead, the court found that the couple enter into to an implied agreement, based on Hargrave’s testimony. On cross eximination, Hargrave testified that there was never an agreement between her and Duval to be married. Her testimony showed that no specific time existed when the couple mutually agreed, or decleared their intent to be married. The courl ruled that for a Common Law marriage to be valid a couple must show more than an implicit agreement to be married. Hargrave v. Duval-Couetil, 777 N.W.2d 380 (South Dakota 2010).
If we all could live by these obligations in our country, crime rates would be little to none, and there would be a system of unified respect between all of the citizens of the
60 percent of drug cartel revenue comes from the illegal U.S. marijuana market. As a result of the prohibition of marijuana, vicious drug cartels have been created across the border. The number of deaths caused by cartels have significantly increased so much that they surpass the amount of U.S troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. The Californian government is facing historic deficits that lead to factors which could destroy the economy. By controlling marijuana, Proposition 19 will help cut off funding to the cartels and decrease the amount of deaths caused by them as well as providing a new source of money for the government.
If liberty is not clearly defined, then it serves as a concept that gathers meaning from the changing economic and social facts that remain in society. The court has held that the “freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Personal liberties extend to a women’s choice to have a family and if she decided to not have a family then it reasons
Matthew Feeler Political Science 101 M/W Byron 11/17/16 Midterm: Question 1 The 14th Amendment was created after the civil war in 1868 and the underlying premise of the amendment gives equal protection and rights to slaves. This main idea was obviously the cause of the civil war and gaining freedom from slaves. Although, another part of the Amendment was what is known as the “due process” in which citizens are granted rights to life, liberty, and property. A huge topic of controversy for years has been the idea of same-sex couples being able to marry, and recently in 2015 the supreme court ruled that same sex marriage is legal which to some was very surprising, although some believe that with the 14th amendment, this is a right that should
There were two sides of this legislation. The first side made marriage and the bearing of children a duty to the state. To ensure better results, the state offered incentives, such as tax breaks, to citizens who observed the laws and imposed several impairments on citizens who refused (Wiki). These laws enforced marriage *upon young men and women within similar age ranges, and remarriage on the divorced and widowed person within certain time limits***. The other side of this legislation placed family morality in higher
This paper describes and analyzes a life review interview with an older adult. The purpose of this paper is to discuss, record and reflect on an older adult’s life in order to evaluate them on the last stage of Erik Erickson’s theory of psychosocial development; integrity versus despair. This paper will also focus on the elements of a life review as well as the reflections of the interview on the part of the author. JC is a seventy-seven year old white male who lives by himself in New York City. He was born in London, England, and was an only child.
Those who go by the living constitution approach agree that marriage cannot be denied to gay people because the
Accommodations and Modifications Accommodations Accommodations mean the services which we present to the learners to help them to access the education curriculum Modifications They mean the changes in the curriculum. Modifications are very important for the learners with disabilities who do not have the ability to understand all the content. This means that both the accommodations and modifications are methods or ways the teacher can use to serve the needs of disabilities students, so they are very im-portant and useful to reach to our goals.
Lifestyle intervention have proved to reduce incidence of diabetes, whether or not exist an impaired glucose tolerance (1, 2). Moreover, changes in diet and exercise have shown a positive impact on HbA1c in patients with Diabetes Type 2, as was found in a meta analysis of Chen et al where a significant standardize difference in means of HbA1c (-0.37 P=0.0001)was evident(3).Furthermore, lifestyle interventions have a well known effect over lipid profile, markers of inflammation and a positive impact on body composition, that is, an increase in lean mass and a reduction of fat mass(1). All of the above makes a lifestyle behavioural intervention a successful management strategy for patient with Diabetes, not only because of the impact on glycaemic control but for the potential improvement on quality of life(4).However, emphasis on lifestyle intervention in clinical practice is not the expected, only 42% of primary care providers discuss lifestyle intervention with patients during clinical visits(5), which is as a lost opportunity to promote self-care behaviours that could make an impact on outcomes at a minimal
Are we obligated to obey unjust laws? Laws are important because they are guidelines for a state. Without laws citizens would not know how to act and cause harm to others. Laws are aimed at common good and keep a society together and functioning.
The two important values that I have learnt are the independence and the respect. I learnt these two values since my childhood. One of the values is the independence. Independence means that you can support yourself without owning or depending on yourself concerned with livelihood or studying. You can make decision of your life without being controlled by the others.
In Canada, many people understand marriage to be a legal union between a couple that formally recognizes their true love for each other. In other parts of the world, different cultures practice arranged marriages planned by the family or guardians of the bride and groom. Without a doubt, there are successful long-lasting love stories derived from arranged marriages. However, the whole process of an arranged marriage can have negative social implications. In my opinion, I believe that arranged marriages are wrong and should no longer be acceptable across the globe.
In a perfect world we would all be eating the right food, exercising, sleeping well and just generally enjoying life. In the real world most of us manage a percentage of the healthy lifestyle and muddle through as best we can with the rest of it. Part of the problem is we are encouraged to think, mostly by the media, that we should be doing everything possible towards a healthy lifestyle, all of the time. For most of us this is just not possible.