Many teachers fail to differentiate what is important and what is not. To be easy to grade, tests cannot measure higher order thinking. Critical thinking often gets left behind and memorization has taken over. Many students just simply don’t perform well on tests, but with these standards schools are held to it puts alot of stress on teachers who then push it onto their students. According to a psychology teacher, Melissa Hurst states that standardized test scores are greatly influenced by non academic factors, such as fatigue and attention span.
In “Math Anxiety: A Comparison of Social Work and Non-Social Work Students,” David Royse researches how social work students’ bad experiences with math bode poorly for the preparation for their field, which often involves taking statistics courses. He does some interesting background research into the history of mathematics anxiety, making the claim that “math anxiety is thought to be acquired rather than inherited” (Royse 271). Royse argues that social work students need a certain level of quantitative analysis skills, but many are incapable of overcoming their math anxiety in order to reach the minimum mathematics requirement for social work. Statistics for social workers is important so that they “can use research as a tool to improve their practice and to build knowledge for the profession” (Royse 271), but it is increasingly difficult to develop these skills when “most social work majors had not completed a college algebra class” (Royse 271). Since math anxiety is not an inherent trait, any acquired math anxiety can be reversed with better teaching, in particular for social work students that need to use mathematics in their studies.
Recently, a Duke University professor, named Harris Cooper conducted a study about homework. His results showed that students who did homework did worse in school. The work caused low energy physically and mentally, and a negative perspective towards school itself. (Time) If homework is making children have an overload, they are not going to do good on the tests that matter. In addition, if kids do not like school, they will not try.
“Sometimes, the most brilliant and intelligent minds do not shine in standardized tests because they do not have standardized minds” Diane Ravitch. Standardized test are a collection of information about one or more students. This means that different students will take the same test and then the test will be evaluated by professors to see how students did. Standardized test also provide teacher evaluation, which is if the professor is teaching the students in the right way, meaning if students are understanding what the professor is teaching. Like many issues in education, standardized testing brings a lot of controversial opinions among teachers, voters and parents.
Math is tested more frequently than any other subject in the U.S. (Boaler 21), which can be exhausting and debilitating. That is where the negative message of math needs to start changing. Stop testing children and grading them as if they are an object and teach them to understand and apply real math. What is taught in school is not what a mathematician would recognize as math. Through this, children lose their interest of math hitting elementary
Past studies have also demonstrated this basic trend” (Huffingtonpost.com, 2012). Teachers often believe that homework can help with improvement in the classroom as well as with test scores, but studies have proven this belief to be wrong and that it actually does the opposite. Therefore, all of these studies have proven that too much homework causes test scores to drop and that students will have better chance at succeeding in life with a helpful homework
Many comments of students were made that they use previous works as an inspiration. This is also supported by one of the responses the study had when a question, “Is it acceptable for you to plagiarize when you have the opportunity?”. These “inspiration” is often mistaken as plagiarism whether such an approach is considered plagiarism is questionable. Students blame teachers in this regards due to many reason. When students look out for other sources they believe that programme code looked upon on the same manner as solution to math problem as in having only one correct
We know talk about Englishes rather than English and multiliteracies rather than literacy Language cannot be defined so that it relates to just one particular element of human evolution. Language can be looked at as a cognitive development in which educators teach their students to speak using grammatically correct language. However, it can also be looked at as something which is physically present and can be manipulated to suit the requirements of the speaker. This can be done through elements of communication including speech, audio recordings, and written text, thus making it similar in properties to material objects (Gee & Hayes, 2011, p.6). Furthermore, there is the requirement of developing the context of written and oral language, due
Many believe mathematics can only be taught in a sequential and linear matter through the means of rote memorization. This means an educator delivers content matter, such as, formulas and equations directly while students passively listen. Gary Tsuruda, a former middle school math teacher, writes about how this might not be the best approach in the article Paradigm shift. While teaching math in a rote matter worked for some of his students, he found that he wasn’t reaching out to all of his student’s needs. Tsuruda decided to shift away from this traditional style of teaching mathematics, and take on a more constructivism approach.