Enron Scandal Analysis

In Rockefeller’s mind, however, he was not being unfair he; was rather just using effective business techniques. After a woman named Ida Tarbell accused Rockefeller of such things by saying: “He has manipulated railroad rates to allow him into the market, but then raised them to keep his competitors out. His company also lowered his prices to run the competition out of business and raised them when his company had no competition in order to create a monopoly. I am by no means against your success, Mr Rockefeller; but I am against your greed and unfair methods”(“Interview”). Rockefeller then responded to these accusations by saying: “I see nothing wrong with what I’ve done, these are just highly effective tactics, not unfair tactics; she is just a misguided woman”(“Interview”).

The United States economy, at the time, was prosperous but unstable due to its relatively new industrial presence. There was a lack of laws monitoring the competitive market places and Rockefeller and Flagler took advantage of that in order to grow their company into a dominant force in the oil refining businesses (Gordon, 2008). Prior to the establishment of Standard Oil, the oil refining business was a free market with many competitors and little opportunity to control prices. The industry itself was fragmented into several parts; those parts include drilling, transporting, containing, and distributing. Not wanting to venture onto other projects, Rockefeller emphasized his company’s focus on only the oil industry and its products and “by the turn of the twentieth century, he had consolidated large segments of the oil industry into a single vertically integrated company with overwhelming market power” (Pratt, 2012).

The wealthy aren’t affected by this outsourcing, which is why it mattered little to them when the assembly jobs started to dissipate. McClelland was trying to demonstrate the power of capitalism through the statement that 24% of people in the United States define the American Dream as not being indebted. His boldest assertion is, “that in a system that picks winners and losers, it’s not fine to have the middle class labeled as a loser”. Therefore, this assertion stands high above the rest as it is the assertion of his thesis idea within the last few words. Without a doubt McClelland is all about the middle class and has intent on watching it rise back to power.

A foolish person usually spends his money carelessly. ii. Materialism worsens and petrifies everything, making everything hard and every truth false. Preview: Today, I will tell to audience about materialism, why people are obsessed about it the positive and negative side of being materialism in the society. Body 1.

Corporate Governance Issues Which Were Missed 2.1 Conflict of Interest CEO tried to maximize its bonuses and wealth by showing Toshiba’s profitability as much higher than it actually was to the public. Instead of the interest of shareholders of the company, all he cared about was his gain. 2.2 Sustainability The incredible losses experienced by the firm supports that Toshiba executives were not running the company in a sustainable manner. Senior management focused on explaining high profits only in their own terms, however they did not think about a stable and sustainable future for the company. 2.3 Government Requirements Unrecognized accounting statements are not supported by any state authority.

A study by Nodon (2015) has demonstrated that the fraud triangle consists of three factors: motivation, opportunity, rationalizations. The first element is motivation or pressure, Buchholz (2012) clarified the main reason that pressure people to commit an act is due to financial complication. The incentive for Bernard Madoff was to keep a trend for a successful lifestyle Buchholz (2012). Hurt (2009) elaborated that Madoff was feeling pressurized due to the sum of money he has to repay to existing investors. The second factor of fraud triangle is opportunity, there are high chance fraudsters would not be exposed because of their powers and position and there is a direct relationship between fraud opportunity and weak internal control (Dorminey et al., 2010).

The recent attempts to align executive interests with that of the shareholders have been important stepping stones in the ultimate goal of assuring ethical behaviour. A survey by KPMG in 2005 found that bonus payments to executives had risen faster, but were hardly ever linked to long term strategy of the company and shareholder value. There should be a formal and transparent procedure for developing policy on executive remuneration and for fixing the remuneration packages of individual directors. No director should be involved in deciding his or her own remuneration, albeit remuneration committee as formed by Megatron directors. Businesses today need to be ethical in the way they operate.

When Harrison was chosen for the precidency he choosed to have the taxes over imported goods increased. By doing this he won support because this helped not only the business men but the country in general. Since people stopped importing and started buying what the united states produced the state won more money. The spoil system was a big issue of corruption in the guilded age. It often hold a battle between the two political parties.

Well known economist Milton Friedman said that “there is no social responsibility for businesses other than to make profits.” According to that thesis, either corporate philanthropy is making profits for the firm or the firm should not be participating in such an activity. He also states that any social responsibility other than making profits and abiding the law is a social wrong. I beg to differ. Because I believe any variety of ethical behavior in business can fall into the realm of social responsibility, the term social responsibility is very extensive in itself. But businesses have a number of other duties, whether they're little or large in surroundings that are competitive.

Morgan was often praised for leading Wall Street out of financial crisis, but was scrutinized by journalists, politicians, and other because they thought he had too much power (History.com Staff, 2009). Morgan believed he didn’t have too much power. In fact, he believed he didn’t really have any power at all. He said in his testimony before the Bank and Currency Committee of the House of Representatives, “I never sold short in my life that I know of, but I do not see how you will get along without it. It is a principle of life, I think.