Growth of Environmental Activism in India
India is a land of rich biodiversity. The ancient literature and the Vedas have considered the earth as a mother. The noble prize winner Rabindranath Tagore in one of his essays Tapovan writes: “Indian civilisation has been distinctive in locating its source of regeneration, material and intellectual, in the forest, not the city. India’s best ideas have come where man was in communion with trees and rivers and lakes, away from the crowds. The peace of the forest has helped the intellectual evolution of man. The culture of the forest has fuelled culture of Indian society. The culture that has arisen from the forest has been influenced by the diverse processes of renewal of life, which are always at
…show more content…
Even today significant amount of our population depends on natural resources like forests, rivers, land etc. for their livelihood and sustainability. Thus people have always come together to protect these resources. The Bishnois community in Rajasthan that dates back to the 15th century can be considered as the first environmentalist of India. Their guru Jambheshwar made it compulsory for them to ‘not cut green trees’ and ‘be compassionate to all living beings’. He preached that environment is the vital source of human survival. Centuries later it was only after the Chipko movement (1973) in Garhwal region in the state of Uttaranchal that environmental protests and activism gained momentum and the larger issues of forests, building dams, mining, pollution was being taken up by the activists and also the state became more conscious regarding these …show more content…
P. (1994): ‘Environmental Movements in India’, American Geographical Society, Vol. 84, No. 1, p. 33]
The need for such movements grew after 1864 when the British took over India's forest covers and established their own forest department. They forced indigo plantations in eastern India and cotton plantations in western and southern India. This was followed by the Deccan movement for land and forest rights, however, they were regarded as part of the anti-colonial movement and the environmental message was subsumed.
This was one of the serious concern for the environmental activists. Pre-independence, the environment movements were submerged into the larger anti-colonial movements and after independence these movements were overshadowed by larger political and economic good of the country. Such movements were often termed as anti- development or anti-state. The core environmental issue often seemed to get dissolved in these
In this article, " Feminist Consumerism and Fat Activists: A Comparative Study of Grassroots Activism and the Dove Real Beauty Campaign." (Johnson and Taylor, 2008) reveal the degree and technique that are made effective to create social change among the standard of beauty based off of appearance. Several aspects are studied to reflect the comparison and contrast of the findings among the two activism groups. Dove and Pretty, Porky, and Pissed Off (P.P.P.O.) target the idea of beauty and the meaning of cultural values. These two groups advocate and influence people, but the range of who is aware of their motto is differently reached.
Protecting the nature and preserving the forests was a vital part of countless environmentalists in the past. From the godfather of environmentalism, to the woman who pioneered the study of chimpanzees in the wild, many scientists and environmentalists have shown significant importance towards the nature and the beautiful world around them. To name a few, John Muir, Jane Goodall, Ansel Adams, and Rachel Carson are examples of inspiring people who gave importance to forests and natural landscapes for America. One of the vital people in the world who helped develop a movement towards the nature was John Muir. From the article in Source #2, “Is Conservationist Muir Still Important?”, the author states that, “He's a larger-than-life figure
Nature can unlock someone’s purpose because it lets others see what the world has become an what they want to make it. It can also bring people together as Montag recalls, “And on either side of the river was there a tree of life which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded fruit every month; And the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations” (158). The leaves are the bonds between people that let countries heal and reconcile.
The inhabitants right to an “environment that is not harmful to their health and well-being” and the right to “ecologically sustainable development” is violated. Environmental ethics, on the other hand, is the area of applied ethics that discusses, reflects and reasons on normative measures (values, rules, norms, criteria) for dealing with non-human natural entities in a responsible way (Karafyllis 2013, p.292). In particular, it refers to the value that mankind places on protecting, conserving, and efficiently using resources that the earth provides. Simply put, environmental ethics poses the question - what, if any, moral obligation does man have to the preservation and care of the non-human
Since the beginning of mankind, there have been many examples of humans developing both positive and negative relationships with the environment. From early Native Americans preciously cultivating and restoring their natural surroundings, to large manufacturing conglomerates of the modern age polluting air and water without regard, the interaction between humans and their environment has been both productive and destructive in various ways. By evaluating that it is much more important for a developing civilization/nation to conserve and protect its resources rather than fully develop them, we can completely understand the unique impacts that the human race has had on the environment, and how significant the negative gaffes and consequently,
In the early 1960’s, the original state of the American environmental justice movement can be traced back to the emergence of the American Civil Rights movement. Prior to the concerned environmentalism with humanity’s adverse impact upon the environment, but there are arguments that are primarily concerned with the impact of an unhealthy environment that forcefully pushes upon a collective body of life, entailing both human and non-human existence, including in some instances plant life. I found the Environmental Racism and Environmental Justice more interestingly and I chose to write about that.
Dr.Lalvani claims that under British rule, India was modernized, giving the foundation for a government that therefore gave law and order. While this system and others were built, they were built almost entirely for British benefit and even profit. In this new government, Indians had no say in the laws being decided by the British, that were impacting them. The laws were meant to further control Indians, while the British extracted India’s wealth and flood India’s markets with textiles with the help of railroads. Wanting more and more wealth, the British logged forests to create land to grow cash crops which in the end degraded the soil making it more difficult for them to grow.
In the mid-1900s, scientists developed new varieties of plants such as wheat and other grains that had higher yields and greater resistance to pests, diseases and drought. This was considered a long-range response to the hunger, environmental damage and global epidemics that many countries worldwide were faced with as part of World War 2. This is what was known as the Green Revolution. The Green Revolution, though it helped with a greater grain production, it also resulted in changes concerning role women within the workforce, a negative effect of the environment and traditional values specifically In Punjab India and a defined difference between the rich and the poor.
In the progressive nations directions, those places could yield tropical produce. They also develop the territory by building roads, canals, railways, and telegraphs. (Doc 2) This made it so the British practically robbed foreign lands of raw materials and took it for themselves. At the time, India's economy was centered around agriculture, which would then be exported to England.
Mohandas Gandhi was a “key figure in the Indian struggle for independence.” He worked to use nonviolent ways to fight for equality and change in India. Gandhi was able to unite many groups and “inspired the common people of India to work for change.” In addition, Gandhi advocated using a more traditional approach (Wadley 202). Although Mohandas Gandhi 's satyagraha campaign caused violence, his advocacy for those who were discriminated against in Indian society led to the initial unification of India to gain independence from Great Britain.
The British worked to help preserve the environment and animals (#17).The British destroyed forests and the soil that they farmed on. After a few years the soil was degraded and the quality went down (Doc 7). This shows how even though they worked to preserve the environment, the British were really just tearing up India’s land to farm for their own crops and then ship them back to Britain. The British built 10,000 tracks and 136,000 bridges (#14). They built railways to secure their own British rule in India (#13).Even though they built lots of bridges and railroads for transportation most of it was mainly built to benefit themselves and make sure they kept their rule in
The Mughal rule, which roughly extended from 1526 to 1707, was a period when the political and natural environments of much of the Indian subcontinent underwent drastic change. The Mughals had a deep fascination towards nature but also acknowledged their superiority, both as humans and as royals, over it as well as the tribal societies that lived amidst nature. Their constant involvement in warfare led them to look at the forest and animals such as elephants and horses as precious resources; consequently, the military demands of an empire the size of the Mughals’ took a toll on these resources. Extensively engaging with nature for political and social purposes, the Mughals played an important role in transforming the pluralistic landscapes that fell under their empire. But more importantly, they paved the way for the colonial period to extract resources from nature in an intensive way; the impact of their engagement with nature was felt strongly only during the later colonial period.
Imagine you live in a world where there are no plants, forest, animals, or oceans all there is in where these things us to be is concrete, landfills of garbage, and buildings. This is what will transpire if we do not protect or wildlife, wildlife conservation is a very important situation as it helps keeps plants and animals off the endangered list. According to the World Wild Life organization there are twenty-six endangered animals and twenty-one critically endangered animals this is very overwhelming as animals are an important part of our environment and ecosystem. With human population increasing at an alarming rate, with the growing rate of humans there is going to be less land for animals and plants, more man-made pollution and plastic debris will go into the oceans, lakes, and streams.
Therefore, we need to think about tomorrow with respect to every action that we take in the environment and in this case we can say that sustainable development requires slower population growth. With this in mind, we need to be educated through our cultures about the impact we caused to the environment as we continue to reproduce. The challenge of environmental ethics has led to the attempt to apply traditional ethical theories, including consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, to support contemporary environmental concerns; the preservation of biodiversity as an ethical goal; the broader concerns of some thinkers with wilderness, the built environment and the politics of poverty; the ethics of sustainability and climate change, and some directions for possible future developments of the discipline [ CITATION And15 \l 1033 ]. With this multi-dimensional approach one can see that it is more of a cultural issue to think of it from its origin.
Introduction: Our earth is the most precious gift of the universe. It is the sustenance of ‘nature’ that is the key to the development of the future of mankind. It is the duty and responsibility of each one of us to protect nature. It is here that the understanding of the ‘environment’ comes into the picture. The degradation of our environment is linked with the development process and the ignorance of people about retaining the ecological balance.