Causes of Delinquency There are two different views as regards the causes of delinquency one view is held by hereditarianism, who hold the belief that delinquents are born and inheritance is responsible –for antisocial behavior in youth. The other view is quite contradictory to the first view; it lays emphasis on the environmental factors as the sole cause of delinquency.
1) Heredity
Psychologists have been making surveys of family trees to locate the causes of delinquency and crimes in the inheritance of the individual. Studies of family trees of Kalikaks, Jukes and Edward families prove that intelligence and crimes are inherited from generation to generation.
Modern science of psychiatric genetics has little definite contribution to make
…show more content…
Current emphasis on the body type and its relationship to crime and delinquency appears in the studies of William Sheldon and the Gluecks.
According to Sheldon, the mesomorph (the muscular type) is more vulnerable to delinquency than ectomorph or the endomorph. Gluecks in their book “Physique and delinquency” have reported physical factors that differentiate delinquents from non-delinquents.
Clinical approach. Some psychologists tried to show relationship between intelligence and delinquency. Healy and Brunner in their study of delinquents reported that 37 of delinquents were in subnormal range of intelligence. They concluded that delinquency was five to ten times more likely to occur among the mentally handicapped than among the normal group.
John Slawson conducted a study of 1543 delinquent boys and a similar number of non-delinquent boys of same nationality, age and socio-economic status. His major findings concerning the relation between intelligence and delinquency are:
1) 8 out of 10 delinquents did not gain scores comparable to those of non-delinquents in abstract
…show more content…
H.H. Goddard conducted study on levels of intelligence and their relation to delinquency. He concluded from the analysis of data of his studies. “Every investigation of the mentality of criminals, delinquents and other antisocial group has proved beyond the possibility of contradiction… that all are of low mentality.” Healy in his book, “This Individual Delinquent” has reported that the most recurring factor in delinquents was mental abnormalities and peculiarities.
C. Burt studied the syndromes of many factors in individual case studies. He concluded that: Defective discipline in home, parental indifferences and vacillation, disagreement the importance of family environment and mother’s affection in process of social adjustment in later life of the child, 23.5 per cent delinquent boys had been deprived of mother’s affection in comparison with 1.5 per cent of non-delinquents. 36.5 per cent delinquent girls had been deprived of mother’s affection against 5 per cent of non-delinquent.
2) Environmental Factors
Environmental factors which are responsible for delinquent acts will be studied under the sub-heads: (1) Ecological factor, (2) Home, (3) School and (4)
Theories such as, Inherited Criminality, Appearance, and even theories regarding the poor development of key areas of the Central Nervous System (CNS), could all be factors. But what really stands out, is how these biological factors may have interacted within the environment in which these children grew up (Bernard, 2016). Most of the children featured in the documentary were abused, delinquent, and often used drugs and alcohol. Any undetermined biological or physical factor as identified by the biological theories of crime, could very well have played a role when factored into the environmental conditions that the child was growing up
The chapter notes that two of the most studied factors effecting delinquency are school bonding and school engagement. The Saints tended to be well involved in school and well liked. One of the Saints was the vice president of the class and all were well liked by other students. The Roughnecks on the other hand were not well respected by peers and their academic performance was much lower than those of the Saints. These differences likely contributed to the increase of perceived delinquency of the Rednecks.
Initially, peer and family influences can greatly contribute to children committing juvenile acts. Mandel states “there are parents who
In this sense, influence of peers is easily a tell-tale sign of future criminal behavior. If a child is less involved with their peers and outcasted the likelihood of the child becoming criminal rises. Aditionally, if a child were brought up in either socioeconomic standpoints, child abuse/neglect plays a significant role in future criminality. A study shows that a child who experienced abuse/neglect were at a 50% higher risk to involve themselves in criminal acts. This goes to show that nature vs. nurture are significant factors in criminal behavior.
My paper aims to discuss the three different factors of criminal behaviour, what causes it and why. My essay will examine and focus mainly on the genetic makeup of a person, the environment in which they are raised in and gender differences.
This theory clearly rules out the effect of inherited or innate factors, and the last is the cognitive theory, which is based on how the perception of an individual is manifested into affecting his or her potential and capability to commit a crime. (Psychological theories of crime) Relating these theories to the case under study, it’s clear that the behaviour can be traced most times to faulty relationships in the family during the first years of
Today, there are proven facts that people who have parents that are criminals have a high chance of becoming criminals themselves. Not only can people become criminals because of their family but they can also become criminals because of the environment that they surround themselves in. This is where nature versus nurture comes into play. A person’s nature is their genetic makeup, basically meaning that a person’s nature is the genes they get from their parents. Also, a person’s genotype, one’s genetic makeup based on the sequencing of the nucleotides we term, provides them with physical traits that set the stage for certain behaviors (56).
Understanding the risk and protective factors of child delinquency is imperative in order to create and implement treatment and intervention programs. Because children’s behavior develops during the first five years, it is important to know what risk and protective factors could increase the likelihood of a child becoming a child offender (Wasserman et al., 2003). Moreover, overcoming the risk factors would help prevent the child offender from becoming a juvenile, and later, adult offender. As Wasserman et al (2003) stated, “risk factors for child delinquency operate in several domains: the individual child, the child’s family, the child’s peer group, the child’s school, the child’s neighborhood, and the media” (pg.1). As one can see, children are exposed to risk in partially every aspect of their lives.
This paper draws on existing sociological research in identifying a number of theories used in explaining the formation of gangs. The theories discussed are social structure theories, social conflict theory, and social process theories all of which highlight elements of strain in different forms as they relates to gang formation. According to Merton, (as cited in Schneider & Tilly, 2004) structural theories significantly emphasize the role of social and economic structures as the causes of delinquent behavior and tend to treat criminal behavior as the result of the undesirable and dysfunctional structures (P. 3.).
We were told that this theory is too broad because it explains everything and yet explains nothing. The question of which came first the chicken, or the egg conception is the same of learning is too simplistic. Do we truly learn from those who are closest to us who else can we learn from? We should ask the all-time question, “Why don’t we commit crime?” not why do we.
Furthermore, the psychology of criminal behavior, psychology, and criminology all have a primary objective of achieving an understanding of the variation in the criminal behavior of individuals (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). Empirically, the study of variation in criminal behavior is done by the studying of covariates (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). The primary covariates that PCC studies are biological, social, and psychological (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). Although, criminology tends to assess criminality at an aggregate level, in comparison to the psychology of criminal conduct’s focus on an individual level. Additionally, a psychology of criminal conduct involves applying what is learned by the studying of psychological information and methods to the predicting and influencing the propensity of criminal behavior on an individual
According to Siegel (2015), trait theory is the view that criminality is a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits which can be subdivided into two major categories: those that stress biological makeup and those that stress psychological functioning (p. 109). Biological trait theories includes four different conditions: biochemical, neurophysiological, genetic, and evolutionary. Biochemical factors will include diet, hypoglycemia, hormonal influences, premenstrual syndrome, lead exposure, and environmental contaminants. Neurophysiological factors will include brain structure, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, brain chemistry, and arousal theory. Genetic causes could stem from parental deviance, adoption studies, and
The set of the structural-functional theories are among the most widespread perspectives on the juvenile delinquency. The group of the theories regards that the behavior of the underage delinquent is caused by the breakdown of the social process that consequently results in the increase of conformity (Thompson & Bynum, 2016). The group of theories presumably blame institutions that are responsible for the socialization of the young delinquents for the way the socialize the individuals by causing them to conform to the values of the society. One of the central theories of the juvenile delinquency is the anomie theory that is rooted in the early studies by the sociologist Emile Durkheim.
A significant part of theory focuses on delinquency and the domino like effect of deviant behavior that results for children into adulthood. According to the United States government, 25-33% percent of school aged children are subject to the victimization
Retrieved May 31, 2015, from Abandunadong Kahoy Website: https://imaginaryblogger.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/juvenile-delinquency-its-effects-and-how-to-solve-it/ (2014, May). Retrieved May 31, 2015, from Wikipedia Website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syndicate Bridges, K. B. (1926-1927). Factors Contributing Juvenile Delinquency. 17, 531. Farrington, D. P. (n.d.).