Platonism played an influential role in the Saint Augustine’s understanding of and conversion to Christianity. By bringing concepts from Platonism into Christianity, Augustine not only helped shape his conception of Christianity, but through doing so he also contributed important ideas to theology and philosophy—more specifically, epistemology and metaphysics. In this essay, I will demonstrate how Augustine brought Platonism into Christianity and argue he was mostly successful in combining the two. Before displaying how Augustine applied Platonism to Christianity, I will briefly explain Platonism and some of its main claims. Next, I will focus on the three main ways Augustine applies the metaphysics and epistemology of Platonism to Christianity, …show more content…
The metaphysical view he applies to Christianity mirrors the theory of forms, as he assigns several of the attributes and roles of the forms to God. For instance, Augustine describes the nature of God as timeless, immutable, and infinite, and asserts that He belongs to the intelligible or spiritual realm of reality. (Confessions 133-134). In addition, God’s role in the existence of all physical things in the world mimics that of the Forms. For instance, just as all beautiful things exist only to the extent to which they partake in the form of Beauty, similarly, all physical things exist as part of and because of God. Augustine also employ the relationship between forms and physical things to argue the relationship between God and the physical world is a unified hierarchy in which all physical things are tied to God, who is the ideal form and the ultimate source of existence.(Stanford encyclopedia). By attributing the nature and roles of the forms to God, Augustine provides a philosophical explanation for God’s omnipotence and the existence of and nonphysical entities. Furthermore, the application of the metaphysics of Platonism is significant because it allows Augustine to dismiss empiricist objections to Christianity, such as one objecting to Jesus’s resurrection because he or she has never seen someone rise from the dead, or claiming God does …show more content…
According to Platonism, to possess real knowledge of a thing one must know its form; however, this knowledge is solely intelligible. Augustine applies a similar rationale to defend Christian faith and the existence of a spiritual reality. For instance, he posits God and spirituality, like the forms, cannot be known through the senses. An important aspect of Augustine’s argument for faith is his theory of illumination, which posits faith is a necessary condition for understanding God and the Christian doctrines(Rist p.32). To illustrate this, he explains that while he could read the words of the scripture he could not truly understand them until he was graced by God with religious faith. According to Augustine, in acquiring real knowledge, faith plays a more significant role than reason, as it informs and enhances one’s ability to reason (Rist 27) Furthermore, faith is important because one cannot have true knowledge and understanding of God and the intelligible, spiritual world without having faith
All in all, both Plato and Frederick Douglass express the idea that education is a crucial aspect in life and allows one to enrich in their knowledge. With the help of the mistress, Frederick Douglass learned how to read and write which assisted him in escaping from the dreadfulness. On the other hand, Plato conveys the importance of gaining knowledge by presenting symbols such as the power of the light leading to success, education and the symbol of darkness in the cave defining ignorance and lack of apprehension. Even though, one may experience a difficult period in their life it is the very bases as to what can get one out of problems. When every individual studies through schools of elementary, high school and college it will most likely
As a guitarist, I have desire my guitar to produce music that is accurate, professional, and beautifully sounding. When first beginning to play the guitar, my guitar did not produce these sounds, but I worked tirelessly to reach that musical perfection for which I hungered and admired about more mature players. Drawing from this example, two men in history shared this attitude in pursuit of perfection: Frederick Douglass and Plato. Respectively, one desired a racially equal nation not plagued by slavery and the latter yearned for the complete nourishment of the soul. Although living in different time periods, these two men are visionaries, seeing beyond what is temporal.
The human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.
To Plato, this affirms that the idea of immaterial soul, which must
Augustine faces many decisions in his life which lead to him feeling grief or sorrow about the decisions he makes. This allows the reader to relate to Augustine because many people have felt the same way before about their own life. The emotions that Augustine feels and the struggle he has with his belief in God and the Christian belief are very relatable to many people. I mean in today society many people struggle with their own standing with the Christian
Misunderstandings and faulty ideas are direct results of human reasoning digesting and misinterpreting ideas. Knowledge, in short, fuels reasoning. External concepts are taken in, where human reasoning then extrapolates and comprehends the knowledge. But what we take in from our senses can be misleading. Petrarch expresses in a faithful, crystalline, and unclouded Christian manner that he may not be able to trust ideas from the outside, but “it is He in whom I can trust” (101).
When Antonio first accepted the Catholic god in the form of the Eucharist, he “received him gladly” and waited for the “thousand questions” that “ pushed through” his “mind” to be answered. Even though Antonio waited for the answers “the Voice . . did not answer” (Anaya, 221). Anaya’s use of diction in this excerpt, developed the mood that, Antonio was disappointed in the Catholic god. Moreover, the quote depicted how Antonio did not get any answers to questions which haunted him for so long.
This is knowledge which grants eternal happiness and meaning cannot be philosophized by the castaway; it must arrive in the form of news, which is the Absolute Paradox. By faith, this news must be heard and heeded. The Christian faith is neither knowledge nor science nor a “miraculous favor which allows one to… believe the impossible” (146). Faith is a form of communication from God, which is delivered by an apostle whose message, while transcendental and paradoxical, is believable and necessary. Jesus, who comes to bring news across the seas does so with authority and steadfastness to the point of martyrdom.
Christianity has always been subjective and ambiguous, which allows for theories and speculation to develop regarding the religion’s values and characteristics. A key matter in theology seeks to understand those values and to identify a model of living that guides people away from corruption to remain in God’s image. Athanasius of Alexandria’s On the Incarnation and Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Anti-Christ address this issue with viewpoints that directly contradict each other. Athanasius examines the Incarnation to defend his position that natural human desires corrupt mankind and suggests there is nothing to prevent evil and sin other than God’s salvation while Nietzsche asserts that corruption occurs from a loss of instinctive nature and proposes
Omnipotent means one can do anything. Omniscient means one knows everything. Omnipresent means one is everywhere. Edwards’ also emphasizes the miracle of the “Virgin” birth, sacrifice/crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and God. He mentions a lot about how there is the existence of an afterlife.
Plato discussed a two layer view of what he perceived as reality; the world of becoming and the world of being. The world of becoming is the physical world we perceive through our senses. In the physical world there is always change. The world of being is the world of forms, or ideas. It is absolute, independent, and transcendent.
He argues that the body and soul are two elements that have the same underlying substance. He maintains that a person’s soul is the same as his nature of body; however, he argues that the mind differed from other parts of the body as it lacked a physical feature. In this case, he maintains that the intellect lacks a physical form, and this allows it to receive every form. It allows a person to think about anything, including the material object. In this case, he argues that if the intellect were in a material form, it could be sensitive to only some physical objects.
In Christian tradition, the existence of God is central to the religion and the practices and beliefs associated with it. In this tradition, God can be conceived of as an all powerful, immortal and transcendent being who governs and creates the world as it is known. During the Medieval Era Christianity dominated Europe, leading to an extensive amount of philosophical and scholarly works related to God and how to properly conceive of him. As a result, many philosophical topics and theories were brought under examination in an attempt to combine them with Christian ideologies and conceptions of God and the world. One of the many topics brought under consideration was free will.
Thus, he understood that his sins were being perceived. Augustine started out the seventh book by showing how he evolved from his previous shameful sins. “I did not think of you, my God, in the shape of a human body, for I had rejected this idea ever since I had first begun to study philosophy, and I was glad to find that our spiritual mother, your Catholic Church, also rejected such beliefs.” (Book VII, Section 1, Page 133) This shows that Augustine is beginning to think more about God and how his sins have been watched throughout his whole life.
Baruch Spinoza’s geometric structured view on the universe, and everything in general, is beautifully broken down for present and future thinkers to ponder in his work, Ethics. Although complex at times, his method of demonstrating each discoveries of proved proposition aids readers to conceptual God-Nature. At the base of these propositions are definitions and axioms (truths) Spinoza accounts as certain truths and are critical to understanding God-Nature (substance). I will here provide an account of Spinoza’s substance monism and attribute pluralism, along with strengths and weaknesses in his arguments for this picture of reality.