Ethical dilemmas happen day to day inside of corporations and their workforce endorsing the company and its employees to react quickly. In some cases the choice an employee makes can influence more than company. A perfect case of a workplace dilemma involving ethical employees would be the situation concerning Folole Muliaga and Mercury Energy association. Along these lines, after some reflection on the outcomes and result of Mercury Energy case, the circumstance encompassing this case show some astonishing results in the result and results. The greater inquiry in the wake of exploring the instance of Folole Muliaga, was did Mercury Energy accomplished something unlawful or not?
Under integrity it states that members must be straightforward and honest in professional and business and also fair dealing and truthfulness (Langfield Smith, 2015). If Priscilla choose to support Richard and provide false information to the director than Priscilla is failing to comply with integrity with the company and herself. She is failing to be honest with the company and failing to have strong moral principles, which can lead to a negative consequences in the future that can cause her job to be lost and her accountant title to be taken away from her. I strongly suggest that Priscilla provides the company`s director John Lawrence the report analysis Jackie Chen has prepared, the analysis that is prepared will show an clear and accurate result for the company so that the company can make the most accurate decision which will benefit the company. I understand that Priscilla is under pressure to make decision which will benefit her partner and his department but as an accountant she owns to the company to act in the best interest with honesty therefore she should strongly follow the right pathway and provide the company with the accurate report of analysis while complying with the code of
They are simply if people see or acting a wrong or inappropriate way reported to a higher authority. this includes cheating stealing or harassment in any form. IR codes can only work if the people in the society are all following it but if not the code cannot work or cause negative impact in the problem it intended to help. The broken Honor Code can lead to people feel like they have to cheat to stay ahead with the others that are cheating. although honor codes of the possibility to help a positive impact on society they are bad because without full cooperation of them members of the society the honor code will feel or have a negative impact on that Society.
Media interviews, social media, and investigations can also end up having an affect the whistle-blower's career in the present and the future. The outside world and we all may agree that whistle-blowers are heroes and should be looked up to and thanked for revealing corrupt behavior in the workplace, but for some insiders from the workplace and hiring companies may see them as disloyal people for not keeping the company or the organization’s secrets and practices hidden to the outside world and putting negative attention on the setting or organisation. Although whistle-blowers are trying to do the right thing for their workplace and the people in it making sure they keep people safe and abiding by the policy and procedures of the setting, they can also experience personal issues from their actions from the media in search of a story, as they will search deeper into the whistle-blowers' personal life and their background and this can end up bringing that person down as well revealing certain personal information for all to
The Importance of Individuality “You don’t have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.” Ray Bradbury’s famous quote shows that while differences are disliked by many people, persuading people to be the same is like destroying a culture, eliminating the possibility of future developments. Can being different possibly save a life? While many people see individuality and differences as embarrassing, it is an important part of human life. In The Book Thief by Markus Zusak and A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle, the characters discover that it is harmful to hide from their differences.
A lower standard of evidence, such as the ones presented in Hopkin’s case, can be used as valid proof. This is a step forward to combat discrimination in the workplace because this recognizes that implicit forms of biases, such as stereotyping, have huge impacts in how people are treated in the workplace. Unaddressed biases can affect many workplace decisions, from promotions to daily interactions with coworkers. Not only did this case address this issue, it also established that firms are responsible for making sure that its employees are aware of biases and stereotypes and for proactively looking into incidents where stereotypes might have influenced a workplace
“It is easy to argue that people should be stopped from putting themselves in danger”.Some people may say that people in life or death situations deserve to pay the consequences since they were the one’s that put themselves that that position .These people should not be held for their actions or situations that they are in for the following reason from the story “The Cost of Survival”, “Usually, when people need to be rescued , it is because something unexpected happened.” First of all , these people who are in these type of situations may not have even known that this would occur or that they were putting themselves in danger. According to the story “The Most Dangerous Game”, “ he realized he had reached too far and had lost his balance. The cry was pinched off short as the blood-warm waters of the Caribbean Sea closed over his head”. Rainsford had no idea that he was going to fall over and be left by himself on the island with nobody by his side.The story also states that “ The menacing look in the eyes did not change.The revolver pointed as rigidly as if
He would have deliberately thought about killing another person and proceeded to act out on his thoughts even though it is known widely that harming an innocent person is wrong. Punishment serves as a method to deter people from wrongdoings, and to let people know what actions are wrong. If there were no negative repercussions to wrongful acts, people would simply attribute their wrongdoings to determinism and claim they are not morally responsible for their actions, since their actions stem from prior causes that they have no control
In other words, emotions can either be good or bad. I feel that this is something that should be avoid because, when we refer to certain emotions as good or bad, we develop this concept that it is right or wrong to feel a certain way. This may result in some individuals feeling ashamed to feel “bad.” We have created a society where you force positivity upon people and shame those that are not positive. In doing this, we create a strict environment that fails to consider the diversity in emotion. In addition, if a person feels ashamed of their unhappiness, then they may be afraid to share their feelings.
There is a need to make advertising more effective and less intrusive in our day to day lives. Some ads are just a bother. They want to pop up everywhere and create a negative impression about the product being advertised. Advertisers need to know when to advertise and when to let their consumers relax from all these bombarding ads everywhere. Sadly, advertisers are being duped by data mining companies which provide data that kind of represents consumers in a false light.