Equality 7-2521

The First chapter of the book, Anthem states,“It is a sin to write this. It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon a paper no others are to see. It is base and evil.” In the collectivist society Equality 7-2521 lives in, there are many rules put into place. In this society all must live as one and one must function as all.

“For everything he did he served the Greater Community… worked in a factory and never got fired,” (line 7) the author states this to emphasize that the Unknown Citizen dedicated his life to following the rules and regulations of his job in order to help the society in which he lives. Parsons works in the Ministry of Truth correcting “errors” made in past publications and “was employed in some subordinate post for which intelligence was not required” (Orwell 22). Parsons unquestionably and willingly contributes to destroying the past and hiding the evil of the Party. The Unknown Citizen and Parsons are alike by assisting their leaders’ incessant desire to regulate and control the world in which they

And to earn my love,my brothers must do more than to have been born. ”(96)As you can see towards the end Equality totally becomes independent from the society and starts to have his own opinions. I think this is a big part of information for Aye Rans message on how you should just care about yourself. In the end of the book,Equality and The Golden One realize how they don 't need society anymore and go to live up in a house in the woods where they can become independent.

We knew that men not follow us, for they never entered the uncharted forest. We had nothing to fear from them. Only we wished to be away, away from the city”(Rand 76) This quote is effective since Equality did not care about the society's rules, he wanted to get away and live freely. Therefore this shows defiance due to Equality not obeying the rules in this society, so he escaped for a better life.

In the book Anthem, by Ayn Rand, it tells about a flawless society where everything is gathered and distributed. Eventually the main character escapes the society and lives on his own with everything he can do himself. Ayn Rand went too far when she made the character completely autonomous. Three reasons that support this claim is how they couldn’t make decisions on their own, the way their life was mapped, and how people interact with each other.

You’ll never know yourself until you be yourself. In Anthem by Ayn Rand Equality says “To be free, a man must be free of his brothers.” This quote means a lot, if you follow your brothers all of your life you won’t get anywhere. If you decide to make your own decisions your life will be so much better.

The society also eliminated choices such as what job an individual will possess and to who one could marry. The society pushed for perfection by rejecting individuals who were born sick or broke their societal rules. Because the society lived in a world of “contentment,” Jonas had no idea of the horrible doings within the world he lived. However, Jonas was given the job as the receiver of memory, which granted him the memory of the previous receiver, known as “the giver.” Those memories were filled with color, sex, music, hatred, and all the other forbidden items of his society.

He kept all of those participation awards because he could never get a not-nearly-as-important first place medal. Participation medals give people so much to look forward to in life. It opens them up to a whole new world of participation. It makes them think ‘Hmm, what can I participate in

Individuality makes a person unique and different from anyone else. Their personality frees them from any ties they have with society. Both of the short stories, ¨The Pedestrian”by Ray Bradbury” and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut are about the future, and how technology conforms people to be equal. In the article, “The Sociology of Leopard Man" by Logan Feys is about a tattooed man who doesn’t live anywhere near society. As Fey states “Living in society, we are under constant pressure to surrender our individuality, to the will of the majority, the school, the workplace, the family, etc.”

No freedom, no purpose, no opinion, no choice. All of these thoughts accompany the terrifying concepts of totalitarianism and dictatorship. Every day, we believe that we are safe from falling victim to these forms of reign, but what if we have been placed within one all along without truly knowing the difference? We are aware of power and who may possess it, yet this may not be sufficient for those that seek it. In 1984, George Orwell creates a dystopia where the common people live in conditions set forth by their totalitarian government, known as Big Brother.

He envisioned a world of peace and equality for all. He wanted to change the way India was run. In his ideal state, there would be no representative government, no army, no police force, no industrialization, no religious violence, and a future Indian nation would be modeled after the India in the past. There would be self-sustaining villages, an absence of civil law and it would show an agrarian economy. Gandhi wanted a place where there was no violence, riots, or any civil disobedience.

In the book anthem by Ayn Rand starts off by saying that “Its is a sin to write this.” Why does he start the character by saying these words? in the book the main character is named equality 7-2521 and in his society they have taught him differently than ours. in mentioned in pg 19 “we are one in all and all in one there are no men but only the great we , one, indivisible forever.” The people in equalities society were taught by using the word “we” not

Irrelevance. This word hopefully comes to mind when discussing the involvement of Ayn Rand’s Anthem in the infamous “lightbulb controversy.” The book may include some aspects of the attempt to pass the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, because trying to take away the right of choice for a company will naturally spark up thoughts about individualism, thus bringing up Ayn Rand and her ideas. However, her unique political views bring up multiple controversial topics, connect very little to the main subject, and are only made to appear worse when used incorrectly by people like Paul Rand. Any mention of Ayn Rand or any of her objectivist ideas will not go unnoticed.