When Nora was forced to reveal the truth to Torvald it showed just how much Torvald really cared about what others thought. He was so worried about her ruining his reputation that he could have cared less what happened to her. Krogstad unintentionally showed Nora just how little she really meant to Torvald. He gave Nora the independence she needed to leave Torvald
Nora’s choice to deceive her husband is irresponsible and childish. Nora makes the decision at the end of the play to leave Torvald after their altercation upon Torvald finding out about Nora’s forged documents. This sudden change of heart could have been avoided had Nora only spoken to her husband and been honest with him.
She had his best interest in mind and only wanted to care for him and make him joyful again. The only way to get this money was through one of Torvalds workers in which she had asked to borrow from. This workers name was Krogstad and he lent Nora this money but only on the terms that she had paid him back. Krogstad gave Nora a contract to sign stating that she would so this very act to pay him back every penny. During this time Nora, being a woman, needing a man’s signature to go along with the agreement so she forged her deceased father’s signature, this was
This acknowledgment is delivered as a result of all that she has experienced and has watched. When Torvald knows about Nora 's activities he ends up noticeably rankled. He stresses over the impact this will have on his notoriety and not on the results his better half may have to confront. Through the disentangling of this mystery is that Nora is at long last ready to get it her identity. Nora understands that Torvald never cherished her for her identity however for the things she did.
“Torvald is so absurdly fond of me that he wants me absolutely to himself, as he says.” This quote is said from Nora to a close friend of hers in the play The Dolls House by Henrik Ibson, and it is a perfect encapsulation of how perspective changes the reading of a story. While a neutral reader would see this line as bad but understandable, A female young adult reader growing up in a time and setting where she has taught to be comfortable about her sexuality would have a very different impression of this line. This female reader would judge TorvaldTovald much more harshly and more lasting than the average reader It is an irrefutable fact that Torvald treat Nora like a child, and this reader would be offended by this. For an example close to
Norah who is meant to be the one who acts like a child in the play because she wasn’t very well educated apart from anything that is happening outside her house, she also doesn’t really have authority in her house. Whereas Torvald is meant to be the antagonist while he was just trying to live up to the society’s expectations. He doesn’t treat Norah as person who is from the same position and treats her as if she is his doll who he can fool around with whenever he gets his free time from being a banker. Krogstad is also considered to be an antagonist but this does not certainly mean he is the villain in the book. Krogstad blackmails Norah in order for him to have a higher position in the bank so that he could provide his family with basic needs.
As Nora does not satisfy any of these roles, we can conclude that she is rebelling against these expectations of society, because she is not taking care of her three children as she ought to. Moreover, Nora treats her children as dolls, by only using them to show off with visitors. This is one case of situational irony, where Nora treats her children the same way Torvald treats her, even when she explicitly criticizes that
Nora is a married woman and has children to take care of. She really has little freedom because of the way Torvald treats her. She is not even I feel as if deep down she knows she is not free and wants something more in her life then to be a entertaining puppet for Torvald. She realizes at the end of the story that Torvald is not good to her because of the way he acted when she told him about forging the signature. When Torvald called her a criminal and other harsh words she realized that she had no true love from Torvald and wanted to be free from him.
Nora is portrayed as a middle-class house-wife, who is dependent on Torvald for financial support. Nora’s reliance on Torvald makes her a ‘doll like figure’ to him. Ibsen shows this through Torvald’s mocking tone, whenever he calls Nora: “My little skylark”, “My little spendthrift”. The animal imagery, ‘skylark’ is a metaphor for Nora, signifying that just like the ‘skylark’ which is trapped in cage, Nora is trapped and admired but not respected. Torvald expresses his emotional and intellectual superiority and dominance over Nora, by calling her ‘little’ always.
A wife who sacrifices everything that she likes, wants, aspire and dislikes in order of maintain the image of the perfect family. One of the crucial moments of the plot is when Torvald found the letter that Krogstad left on the letterbox. After reading the content of the letter, Torvald refers to Nora as “she who was my pride and my joy- a hypocrite, a liar-worse- a criminal. Oh, the unfathomable hideousness of it all! Ugh!