What is equity?
In layman’s terms equity is the term used to describe fairness and justice. The legal term is more strictly defined in that they must obey the rules of precedent and its development appears to be more inflexible and rigid. However there is an element of discretion on the part of the judges in that they have some flexibility. It has well established principles which govern the exercise of the discretion but these principles are flexible and adaptable. The aim of equity is to ‘do more perfect and complete justice’ than would be the result of leaving the parties to their remedies at common law.
Equity developed as a result of the inflexibility of the common law. To deal with this a writ system was introduced in the 12th century.To
…show more content…
The King, through his Chancellor, set up the Court of Chancery to deal with these petitions. Writs bearing the royal seal were issued out of Chancery to deal with any matters of law and justice falling within the King’s concern or prerogative. These issues included murder, treason, and governance of the forests. The King’s prerogative included the power to deal with ‘unjust judgment’ and ‘default of justice’. The Chancellor adjudicated the individual’s petitions, not according to the common law but to the principles of fairness and …show more content…
Until the late 19th century it operated in a separate set of courts which meant that there was much delay and expense for the individual. They are working in different ways towards the same ends. Law and equity are administered by the one court and have borrowed from each other to further the harmonious development of the law . The problems surrounding this was resolved by the Judicature Acts 1873 and 1875 in England and in 1877 in Ireland.
Under the English Judicature Acts 1873-5 the Supreme Court of Judicature was established with concurrent jurisdiction to administer the rules of equity and law within a uniform procedural code. This was followed in Ireland by the Judicature (Ireland) Act 1877.Today the same judges administer both law and equity.
Changes produced by the Interaction of Equity and Common law Equity was not a complete alternative to the common law. Instead it provided a gloss on the law. It added to and improved the common law. These acts established a system of courts in which both the rule of equity and common law could be
Have you ever thought about laws created more than 3,500 years ago by a man known as Hammurabi? Hammurabi was a king of a kingdom known as Babylonia. He ruled nearly 4000 years ago, and ruled 42 years. During his time, Hammurabi carved 282 laws on a stele, which became Hammurabi’s Code. Now we are faced with a question: Was Hammurabi’s Code fair to everyone?
From the 13th to 15th century, liberty, justice, and equality were not very common. During this time the feudal system was already very well established. Kings ruled by divine right which meant they were appointed by God, but in 1215 the barons began to question these rights. The barons rebelled against King John and the Magna Carta soon served as a peace treaty. Many major documents in history have have used the Magna Carta’s ideology and developed them into new sets of laws pertaining to all people.
Moreover, this hierarchical arrangement ensures that cases are heard and decisions made at various levels of the judiciary, allowing for appeals and upholding the principle of checks and balances, guaranteeing impartiality and fairness.
As the rule of law, it focuses on the equal treatment and absence
Equality insures that individuals have the same opportunities and not discriminating them for their: race, sexuality, culture or beliefs. Example: if a care worker declines one of the service user the right to join in group activities because of their race or disability. This would be known as failed to apply equality in their work.
The court structure in the United States is comprised of a dual court system. The dual court system consists of “one system of state and local courts and another system of federal courts” (Bohm & Haley, 2011, p. 274). Although the system has a separate court system for state and federal court, they do connect in the United States Supreme Court. Each court has various levels of jurisdiction to hear and make decisions over cases (Bohm & Haley, 2011).
Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.
Lastly, courts lack the resource to implement policies in line with their decisions. Thus, even when cases are won, “court decisions are often rendered useless” as litigants are left to the task of implementation (Rosenburg 21). Despite the Constrained Courts view that courts are insufficient in producing social change, “it does not deny the possibility” (Rosenburg 21). When the right factors are in place and certain conditions in favor of the case’s outcome, courts can be a powerful institution in promoting justice (Hall 2).
Fairness is defined as “impartial and just treatment or behavior without favoritism or discrimination” by the Webster’s Dictionary (Webster 1). To be fair is to allow everyone the same opportunity to achieve what they
In today's diverse and multicultural societies, an understanding of what social justice is might be considered pivotal and essential for the numerous encounters and relationships that every day take place in the world. However, one's vision of social justice might differ from the concept of it held by another individual, as it can be argued that the fundamental notion of an equal and socially fair justice could be influenced by several factors, such as an individual’s own moral principles and ethics, alongside with their acknowledgement of the society and of the world they live in. In spite of this, a broad, general idea of what social justice is might nonetheless be offered, and throughout this paper, I intend to explore on this socially constructed idea of justice, which, as explained by Adams and Bell (2016), should be equal, democratic, inclusive and respectful of all people, and accommodate, therefore, for their needs. Furthermore, I will also be looking at the understanding of the concept of social justice within the educational context.
The law is meant to provide justice to people. So the main advantages of the common law system is that it is consistent, adaptive, equal and independent. Consistency is achieved through the precedent as the base for the decisions, not the personal attitudes of the judges. The parties, involved in the process, are expecting that their case would be decided as the similar one, it creates certainty in getting equal justice and stability. Precedents are usually developed in the higher courts by the senior
It is important for teachers to create an environment that promotes fairness in order for students to succeed. Equality and equity are both needed to do this. Equality in a class means every student has the same opportunity to succeed. Making accommodations for students is called equity. This is needed in a class to ensure an equal opportunity to succeed is possible for every student.
Malaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice.