Erikson And Maslow's Theory

859 Words4 Pages
Erikson and Maslow's theories are comparable in that they both focus on social and personality improvement. They likewise both estimate that a person encounters distinctive stages or levels of improvement for the throughout their life (Boles, Danner, Briggs, & Johnson, 2011, p. 110).Although these sound like similar ideas, I have observed they do have their differences. Erikson concentrates on stages where an "individual confronts a major challenge or crisis" (Boles et al., 2011, p.107). He proposed that a person encounters every stage at an inexact age and should resolve every stage keeping in mind the end goal to grow legitimately has appeared in figure 2 (pg.9) above. Erikson conjectured that "“If crises are not resolved positively at particular points in the life span that later problems will ensue”…show more content…
The safety needs are met in the second stage in Maslow's pyramid and in the first stage of Erikson's stage of development. S Autonomy versus Shame and Doubt and Initiative versus Guilt is the place they figure out how to be independent and gain self-confidence (Boles et al., 2011). They are in various stages of improvement for every theorist. Erikson trusts that one can't advance progressively to the following stage until individuals have completely created in the stage some time recently. Maslow trusts that one can't consider the following stage of advancement if a person needs have not been met in the past stage. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is straightforward, while Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development are more point by point. Erikson has more stages of improvement, yet the necessities in every stage are satisfied by Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs pyramid. Maslow describes his unmet needs as deficiencies while Erikson classifies them as difficulties of development. (Maslow's compared to Erikson's,
Open Document