First, the 250-mL graduated cylinder, 100-mL graduated cylinder, and the 10-mL graduated cylinder were observed to see the volume of the liquid in each one. Then, one digit further was estimated, and the results were recorded. After that, the 25-mL graduated cylinder and the 50-mL beaker were cleaned and dried. Next, their masses were measured on the scale, and the results were rounded to the nearest thousands decimal place. Subsequently, the Erlenmeyer flask was filled with 100 mL of distilled water. Using the thermometer, the temperature was measured and recorded. Then, the 25-mL graduated cylinder was filled with 25 mL of distilled water, and its mass was measured and recorded. The density of the water was found using the temperature and the Density of water index. Moreover, the calculated volume of water was calculated using the formula of density, and the difference between observed volume and calculated volume was found. This process was then repeated using the 50-mL beaker and the results were recorded. o Part B: …show more content…
Then, the pipet was rinsed with distilled water. The bulbs were then attached to the pipette; filling and dispensing water were practiced using both bulbs. Furthermore, the 250-mL beaker was weighed, and its mass was recorded. After that, the Erlenmeyer flask was filled with 100 mL of distilled water. The temperature was recorded. Using the pipette, 25 mL of the distilled water from the Erlenmeyer flask was filled and dispensed in the beaker. The mass of the beaker containing the water was measured and recorded. In addition, the volume of the water transferred was calculated using the mass and density from the Density of Water table. Finally, the difference between the observed and calculated volumes of water was
Click here to unlock this and over one million essays
Show MoreImmediately 10 μL of double distilled water was added with a micropipette; this way our concentration of the treatment was the intended concentration.
This experiment was created to contrast the effects of osmosis between three gummy bears in tap, sugar, and salt water. To compare the gummy bears, three cups were gathered and filled with twenty-five milliliters of the particular water solution. Then the mass and volume of each gummy bear was recorded into a chart. To find the mass, zero a balance once a strip of wax paper is placed over, and then place your gummy bear and record the mass. To find the volume of the bear, multiply the length, width, and height of the bear in centimeters with the help of a ruler.
Determine the mass of the beaker and NaOH together. 6. Rinse a 250 ml volumetric flask with deionized water. 7. Label the volumetric flask so you know which solution is in it.
The serial 2-fold dilution were done with a volumetric pipette, its pump, and 10 mL volumetric flasks. Eight different solutions were produced, half of which came from Red 40 and the other half, from Blue 1. These different concentrated solutions were placed in a 10 mL volumetric flask, each labelled with either R for Red 40
After the water temperature began to stabilize, the highest constant temperature was recorded. This data was used to calculate the calorimeter constant. This enter procedure was repeated to calculate another calorimeter constant in order to find the average of both answers. After that value was calculated, a 600 mL beaker was filled with 300 mL of water and heated till it started boiling. An unknown metal located on the instructor's bench was obtained and the mass was calculated.
Characteristic Property- Test 2- Density Materials: Triple Beam balance, distilled water, graduated cylinder, unknown 6 Procedure: first we found the mass of the empty graduated cylinder and then its mass with the now distilled unknown. After subtracting the mass of the graduated cylinder, we were able to find the volume. For every 1mL=1cm³ so there we had the volume found with the graduated cylinder. We divided the mass by the volume in order to get the density Data: We found that the density of our unknown was 0.76 g/cm3.
Chemistry 1051 Portfolio Over my time in chemistry 1051, I have learned many valuable lessons, and skills. Accurate recording of data was one of those skills, as was creating a well-organized lab write up that correctly laid out the process we completed. During the very first lab we were also given the task of creating our own method to test the density of a peace of glass. We decided to both measure and weigh the glass, effectively testing the density, and afterwards critiquing both methods and choosing the most effective one.
These small errors may be arised as a result of temperature. Because the accurate mesuring process took much time and during this time the temperature of water was decreasing. Among two methods the density bottle gives more accurate measurement of the volume, resulting in more accurate determination of density. One of disadvantages of hydrometer is that hydrometer has Operator dependent readings, therefore has limited accuracy. Morever, for measuring the density using hydrometer large sample volume is required.
The mass of an 11 dram vial was taken before and after it was filled with 15 mL of distilled water, resulting in a mass of 29.9667 grams without the distilled water and 44.7771 grams with the distilled water. The looped wire was inserted into the 11 dram vial, to be used for stirring. The 11 dram vial was then submerged into the ice bath, and the Vernier temperature probe was immersed into the 11 dram vial. Once the temperature of the distilled water reached 10°C, the temperature was recorded every 10 seconds. After the data was collected, the 11 dram vial was brought back to room temperature.
Next, a 100 mL graduated cylinder was used to measure 60 mL of distilled water. The water was added to the compound and stirred with a glass-stirring rod until dissolved. Next, The flame test required the solution made during the solubility test. The experiment needed a metal wire that was dipped into the solution
Volume Lab In this four parted lab the purpose is to use measurement and water displacement and calculations to find the volume of various objects. Part A questions were how much drops of water were needed to make 1mL the original hypothesis made was ten drops however this was proven wrong once the data in which twenty drops of water rose 10 mL of water to 11 mL of water, nineteen to rise from 11 mL to 12 ml, and finally eleven drops of water to rise from twelve mL to thirteen mL. Once the average was calculated which was 16.6 drops, which meant on average that's how much it needed to make one mL. By subtracting from the average with the hypothesis the hypothesis was revealed to be 6.6 drops off. Part B questions were based on water displacement. In which the question was how much was the difference between 20 mL of water and 3 marbles.
5. 150 ml of the solution in beaker A was added to the separating funnel with 10ml of chloroform. The funnel was gently shaken and vented to release the pressure. This was done five times. 6.
Next, I removed the water and the quarter from the graduated cylinder and poured 50 mL of water again. I repeated this until I got results for all three coins. To find the volume of each coin, the formula I used was volume of water and coin - initial volume of water ( 50 mL ). To find the density, I divided the mass and the volume of each
Abstract — This experiment was conducted to familiarize the students with the procedures regarding distillation—to be more precise, the separation of ethanol from an alcoholic beverage—using a distillation set-up consisting of boiling chips, a Bunsen burner, a condenser, a thermometer and several other materials. In the end, it was discovered that one may actually separate a homogeneous mixture, given that the components of said mixture differ in volatility and that they utilize a complete distillation set-up and follow laboratory safety rules and regulations. Keywords — Matter, homogeneous and hetereogeneous mixtures, distillation, volatility, boiling point I. INTRODUCTION There are typically two categories of matter, these are pure substances
It was impossible to accurately measure the volume of liquid at any given moment, as the meniscus was moving side to side. Secondly, the distillation was ended while there was still liquid in to round bottom flask. The composition and volume of this liquid were unaccounted for in the calculated